Carolyn J. Dean

Carolyn J. Dean’s Followers (2)

member photo
member photo

Carolyn J. Dean



Average rating: 3.58 · 60 ratings · 8 reviews · 9 distinct works
The Self and Its Pleasures:...

3.58 avg rating — 26 ratings — published 1992 — 5 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
The Fragility of Empathy af...

3.64 avg rating — 11 ratings — published 2004 — 3 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
The Frail Social Body: Porn...

3.56 avg rating — 9 ratings — published 2000 — 5 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
The Moral Witness: Trials a...

3.50 avg rating — 6 ratings4 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
Aversion and Erasure: The F...

liked it 3.00 avg rating — 4 ratings — published 2010 — 4 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
The Modernist Imagination: ...

by
it was amazing 5.00 avg rating — 2 ratings — published 2008 — 8 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
Sexuality and Modern Wester...

3.50 avg rating — 2 ratings — published 1996 — 2 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
Title

0.00 avg rating — 0 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
Sexuality and Modern Wester...

by
0.00 avg rating — 0 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
More books by Carolyn J. Dean…
Quotes by Carolyn J. Dean  (?)
Quotes are added by the Goodreads community and are not verified by Goodreads. (Learn more)

“At the same time, because the phallus is a signifier, that is, because it is part of a relational linguistic (i.e., Saussurian) system, it is not the “truth” about sexual difference. Instead, it represents a truth about the constructedness of sexual difference that is always, in Lacan’s word, “veiled.”111 For Lacan, patriarchy no longer functioned as the foundation of truth but became instead an anchor of cultural fictions.112 That is, the father is both authentic and a charlatan, a man who doesn’t know he is also always other.”
Carolyn J. Dean, The Self and Its Pleasures: Bataille, Lacan, and the History of the Decentered Subject

“What does it mean that we find victims who suffer with dignity more attractive than victims who don’t? What does it mean that we don’t mind it when perpetrators, torn apart by their own experiences, weep openly—but we are rendered uncomfortable when victims do the same? I don’t mean that each and every person has this experience: many of us feel like weeping when we see the carnage created by a suicide bombing and the grieving and shocked faces of the survivors. I mean instead that in all I have read, I detect a strong cultural bias toward aversion when confronted with victims who act as if they have suffered.
[…]
“Fragile, powerless, and helpless victims make us uncomfortable, evoke complicated responses in us, and make it hard for us to empathize with the humiliation they underwent.
[…]
one claim I make in different ways in the book—and very explicitly in chapter 3—is that to be really credible, a victim has to appear to have mastered his or her suffering.”
Carolyn J. Dean

“Lacan braught up Aimée’s case again in order to develop his earlier argument that madness was not evidence of an impoverished mind, of a falling away fram reality, but of an irreparable self: “Madness, far fram being an accident befalling an organism because of its frailties, is the permanent virtuality of a rift opened in its very essence”).92 Paranoids are mad not because their selves are irreparable but because they seek to mend the inevitable rift between the real, irreparable and the ideal or imaginary self.”
Carolyn J. Dean, The Self and Its Pleasures: Bataille, Lacan, and the History of the Decentered Subject



Is this you? Let us know. If not, help out and invite Carolyn to Goodreads.