Sarah Coakley
Born
in London, The United Kingdom
September 10, 1951
Genre
|
God, Sexuality, and the Self: An Essay 'On the Trinity'
—
published
2013
—
12 editions
|
|
|
The New Asceticism
|
|
|
Powers and Submissions: Spirituality, Philosophy and Gender
—
published
2002
—
5 editions
|
|
|
Religion and the Body
—
published
1997
—
8 editions
|
|
|
Re-thinking Gregory of Nyssa
—
published
2003
—
4 editions
|
|
|
Sacrifice Regained: Reconsidering the Rationality of Religious Belief
—
published
2011
|
|
|
Pain and Its Transformations: The Interface of Biology and Culture
by
—
published
2008
—
4 editions
|
|
|
Faith, Rationality and the Passions
—
published
2012
—
9 editions
|
|
|
The Cross and the Transformation of Desire: The Drama of Love and Betrayal
|
|
|
Re-thinking Dionysius the Areopagite
by
—
published
2009
—
5 editions
|
|
“God’, by definition, cannot be an extra item in the universe (a very big one) to be known, and so controlled, by human intellect, will, or imagination. God is, rather, that without which there would be nothing at all; God is the source and sustainer of all being, and, as such, the dizzying mystery encountered in the act of contemplation as precisely the ‘blanking’ of the human ambition to knowledge, control, and mastery. To know God is unlike any other knowledge; indeed, it is more truly to be known, and so transformed.”
― God, Sexuality, and the Self: An Essay 'On the Trinity'
― God, Sexuality, and the Self: An Essay 'On the Trinity'
“First, Freud must be – as it were – turned on his head. It is not that physical ‘sex’ is basic and ‘God’ ephemeral; rather, it is God who is basic, and ‘desire’ the precious clue that ever tugs at the heart, reminding the human soul – however dimly – of its created source. Hence...DESIRE IS MORE FUNDAMENTAL THAN 'SEX'. It is more fundamental, ultimately, because desire is an ontological category belonging primarily to God, and only secondarily to humans as a token of their createdness ‘in the image’. But in God, ‘desire’ of course signifies no LACK – as it manifestly does in humans. Rather, it connotes that plenitude of longing love that God has for God’s own creation and for its full and ecstatic participation in the divine, trinitarian, life.”
― God, Sexuality, and the Self: An Essay 'On the Trinity'
― God, Sexuality, and the Self: An Essay 'On the Trinity'
“gender theory has rightly drawn attention to the centrality of questions of desire, but it becomes narcissistic and inward-looking if it fails to confront the wider and continuing problems of universal ‘justice’ and ‘rights’ for women, worldwide. A classic form of liberal feminism or feminist theology, in contrast, correctly keeps up the ongoing battle on behalf of oppressed and subjugated women, but has difficulties in resisting the dangers of a flat or idolatrous imposition of its own Western agendas, or – more personally – the traps of unresolved personal resentment and hatred. In both cases, as we now see, there are profound spiritual problems to be confronted: the necessary theological repair involves nothing less than an expansion of spiritual consciousness. Such a way invites us beyond the false binary choices we have here discussed.”
― God, Sexuality, and the Self: An Essay 'On the Trinity'
― God, Sexuality, and the Self: An Essay 'On the Trinity'
Is this you? Let us know. If not, help out and invite Sarah to Goodreads.




























