Arthur R. Jensen
Born
in San Diego, The United States
August 24, 1923
Died
October 22, 2012
Genre
Influences
![]() |
The g Factor: The Science of Mental Ability (Human Evolution, Behavior, and Intelligence)
3 editions
—
published
1998
—
|
|
![]() |
Bias in Mental Testing
4 editions
—
published
1980
—
|
|
![]() |
Straight Talk About Mental Tests
5 editions
—
published
1981
—
|
|
![]() |
Clocking the Mind: Mental Chronometry and Individual Differences
4 editions
—
published
2006
—
|
|
![]() |
Educability and group differences
12 editions
—
published
1973
—
|
|
![]() |
Genetics and education
5 editions
—
published
1972
—
|
|
![]() |
Shockley on Eugenics and Race: The Application of Science to the Solution of Human Problems
by
—
published
1992
|
|
![]() |
Educational Differences
—
published
1973
|
|
![]() |
Environment Heredity and Intelligence
2 editions
—
published
1969
—
|
|
![]() |
Harvard Educational Review Volume Thirty-Nine No. 1 Winter 1969
|
|
“Should the discovery of fire have been avoided because arsonists can misuse it? Any kind of information can be misused by those who are determined to do so. The place to stop the misuse of knowledge is not at the point of inquiry, but at the point of misuse.”
― Straight Talk About Mental Tests
― Straight Talk About Mental Tests
“Page 50:
It is a common misconception that psychological measurements of human abilities are generally more prone to error or inaccuracy than are physical measurements. In most psychological research, and especially in psychometrics, this kind of measurement error is practically negligible. If need be, and with proper care, the error variance can usually be made vanishingly small. In my laboratory, for example, we have been able to measure such variables as memory span, flicker-fusion frequency (a sensory threshold), and reaction time (RT) with reliability coefficients greater than .99 (that is, less than 1 percent of the variance in RT is due to errors of measurement). The reliability coefficients for multi-item tests of more complex mental processes, such as measured by typical IQ tests, are generally about .90 to .95. This is higher than the reliability of people's height and weight measured in a doctor's office! The reliability coefficients of blood pressure measurements, blood cholesterol level, and diagnosis based on chest X-rays are typically around .”
― The g Factor: The Science of Mental Ability
It is a common misconception that psychological measurements of human abilities are generally more prone to error or inaccuracy than are physical measurements. In most psychological research, and especially in psychometrics, this kind of measurement error is practically negligible. If need be, and with proper care, the error variance can usually be made vanishingly small. In my laboratory, for example, we have been able to measure such variables as memory span, flicker-fusion frequency (a sensory threshold), and reaction time (RT) with reliability coefficients greater than .99 (that is, less than 1 percent of the variance in RT is due to errors of measurement). The reliability coefficients for multi-item tests of more complex mental processes, such as measured by typical IQ tests, are generally about .90 to .95. This is higher than the reliability of people's height and weight measured in a doctor's office! The reliability coefficients of blood pressure measurements, blood cholesterol level, and diagnosis based on chest X-rays are typically around .”
― The g Factor: The Science of Mental Ability
“As the number of studies increases (...) the investigator is then prompted to examine the anomalous study to find out in what crucial conditions it differs from other studies yielding contrary results. Scientific investigation is the analysis of variables, not just a box score tallying how may studies are pro or con some conclusion.”
― Bias in Mental Testing
― Bias in Mental Testing