Arthur R. Jensen

Arthur R. Jensen’s Followers (22)

member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo

Arthur R. Jensen


Born
in San Diego, The United States
August 24, 1923

Died
October 22, 2012

Genre

Influences


Arthur Robert Jensen was born August 24, 1923, in San Diego, California, the son of Linda Mary (née Schachtmayer) and Arthur Alfred Jensen, who operated and owned a lumber and building materials company. His paternal grandparents were Danish immigrants and his mother was of half Polish Jewish and half German descent. He studied at University of California, Berkeley (B.A. 1945), San Diego State College (M.A., 1952) and Columbia University (Ph.D., 1956), and did his doctoral thesis with Percival Symonds on the Thematic Apperception Test. From 1956 through 1958, he did his postdoctoral research at the University of London, Institute of Psychiatry with Hans Eysenck.

Upon returning to the United States he became a researcher and professor at the
...more

Average rating: 4.34 · 221 ratings · 16 reviews · 14 distinct worksSimilar authors
The g Factor: The Science o...

4.50 avg rating — 117 ratings — published 1998 — 3 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
Bias in Mental Testing

4.44 avg rating — 25 ratings — published 1980 — 4 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
Straight Talk About Mental ...

4.25 avg rating — 20 ratings — published 1981 — 5 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
Clocking the Mind: Mental C...

4.06 avg rating — 16 ratings — published 2006 — 4 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
Educability and group diffe...

4.54 avg rating — 13 ratings — published 1973 — 12 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
Genetics and education

3.92 avg rating — 13 ratings — published 1972 — 5 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
Shockley on Eugenics and Ra...

by
3.30 avg rating — 10 ratings — published 1992
Rate this book
Clear rating
Educational Differences

really liked it 4.00 avg rating — 4 ratings — published 1973
Rate this book
Clear rating
Environment Heredity and In...

really liked it 4.00 avg rating — 2 ratings — published 1969 — 2 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
Harvard Educational Review ...

really liked it 4.00 avg rating — 1 rating
Rate this book
Clear rating
More books by Arthur R. Jensen…
Quotes by Arthur R. Jensen  (?)
Quotes are added by the Goodreads community and are not verified by Goodreads. (Learn more)

“Should the discovery of fire have been avoided because arsonists can misuse it? Any kind of information can be misused by those who are determined to do so. The place to stop the misuse of knowledge is not at the point of inquiry, but at the point of misuse.”
Arthur R. Jensen, Straight Talk About Mental Tests

“Page 50:
It is a common misconception that psychological measurements of human abilities are generally more prone to error or inaccuracy than are physical measurements. In most psychological research, and especially in psychometrics, this kind of measurement error is practically negligible. If need be, and with proper care, the error variance can usually be made vanishingly small. In my laboratory, for example, we have been able to measure such variables as memory span, flicker-fusion frequency (a sensory threshold), and reaction time (RT) with reliability coefficients greater than .99 (that is, less than 1 percent of the variance in RT is due to errors of measurement). The reliability coefficients for multi-item tests of more complex mental processes, such as measured by typical IQ tests, are generally about .90 to .95. This is higher than the reliability of people's height and weight measured in a doctor's office! The reliability coefficients of blood pressure measurements, blood cholesterol level, and diagnosis based on chest X-rays are typically around .”
Arthur R. Jensen, The g Factor: The Science of Mental Ability

“As the number of studies increases (...) the investigator is then prompted to examine the anomalous study to find out in what crucial conditions it differs from other studies yielding contrary results. Scientific investigation is the analysis of variables, not just a box score tallying how may studies are pro or con some conclusion.”
Arthur R. Jensen, Bias in Mental Testing