Peter K. Unger

Peter K. Unger’s Followers (23)

member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo

Peter K. Unger


Genre


Peter Unger is Professor of Philosophy at New York University. He has written extensively in epistemology, ethics, metaphysics and the philosophy of mind. He has had fellowships from the National Endowment for the Humanities and the Guggenheim Foundation.

Average rating: 3.65 · 364 ratings · 36 reviews · 21 distinct worksSimilar authors
Living High and Letting Die...

3.88 avg rating — 164 ratings — published 1996 — 6 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
Ignorance: A Case for Scept...

really liked it 4.00 avg rating — 22 ratings — published 1975 — 9 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
Empty Ideas: A Critique of ...

3.50 avg rating — 22 ratings — published 2014 — 7 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
Philosophical Relativity

3.64 avg rating — 11 ratings — published 1984 — 8 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
All the Power in the World

3.86 avg rating — 7 ratings — published 2005 — 9 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
Philosophical Papers

it was amazing 5.00 avg rating — 4 ratings — published 2006 — 4 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
Identity, Consciousness and...

3.40 avg rating — 5 ratings — published 1990 — 6 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
Philosophical Papers

4.50 avg rating — 2 ratings — published 2006 — 8 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
Elmer's Ethics:a Pennsylvan...

liked it 3.00 avg rating — 1 rating — published 2010 — 2 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
A Defense of Skepticism

it was ok 2.00 avg rating — 1 rating — published 1971
Rate this book
Clear rating
More books by Peter K. Unger…
Quotes by Peter K. Unger  (?)
Quotes are added by the Goodreads community and are not verified by Goodreads. (Learn more)

“scepticism by means of classical arguments, the most effective means initially to promote arousal. And,”
Peter Unger, Ignorance: A Case for Scepticism

“Each year millions of children die from easy to beat disease, from malnutrition, and from bad drinking water. Among these children, about 3 million die from dehydrating diarrhea. As UNICEF has made clear to millions of us well-off American adults at one time or another, with a packet of oral rehydration salts that costs about 15 cents, a child can be saved from dying soon.

By sending checks earmarked for Oral Rehydration Therapy, or ORT, to the U.S. Committee for UNICEF, we Americans can help save many of these children. Here's the full mailing address:

U.S. Fund for UNICEF
125 Maiden Lane
New York, NY 10038

Now, you can write that address on an envelope well prepared for mailing. And, in it, you can place a $100 check made out to the U.S. Fund for UNICEF along with a note that's easy to write:

WHERE IT WILL HELP THE MOST, USE THE ENCLOSED FUNDS FOR ORT.

So, as is reasonable to believe, you can easily make a big difference for vulnerable children.

[...] With our $3 figure in mind, we do well to entertain this proposition: If you'd contributed $100 to one of UNICEF's most efficient lifesaving programs a couple of months ago, this month there'd be over thirty fewer children who, instead of painfully dying soon, would live reasonably long lives. Nothing here's special to the months just mentioned; similar thoughts hold for most of what's been your adult life, and most of mine, too. And, more important, unless we change our behavior, similar thoughts will hold for our future. That nonmoral fact moved me to do the work in moral philosophy filling this volume.”
Peter Unger, Living High and Letting Die: Our Illusion of Innocence



Is this you? Let us know. If not, help out and invite Peter to Goodreads.