David Gerard

David Gerard’s Followers (5)

member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo

David Gerard



Average rating: 3.98 · 461 ratings · 35 reviews · 37 distinct worksSimilar authors
The Catcher in the Rye: A S...

3.95 avg rating — 183 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
Postmortem: A Summary of Pa...

4.06 avg rating — 31 ratings — published 2011
Rate this book
Clear rating
Sing You Home: A Summary of...

2.75 avg rating — 16 ratings — published 2011
Rate this book
Clear rating
Tales from the Laughing Dra...

by
4.30 avg rating — 10 ratings — published 2014 — 2 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
Kay Scarpetta: A Summary of...

liked it 3.00 avg rating — 8 ratings — published 2011
Rate this book
Clear rating
LOST IN PLAIN SIGHT

by
4.40 avg rating — 5 ratings — published 2010
Rate this book
Clear rating
Summary: The Story of Edgar...

really liked it 4.00 avg rating — 4 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
Lost In Plain Sight

it was amazing 5.00 avg rating — 1 rating — published 2010
Rate this book
Clear rating
Art on Wings: Celebrating t...

really liked it 4.00 avg rating — 1 rating
Rate this book
Clear rating
A Million Little Pieces: A ...

liked it 3.00 avg rating — 1 rating
Rate this book
Clear rating
More books by David Gerard…
Quotes by David Gerard  (?)
Quotes are added by the Goodreads community and are not verified by Goodreads. (Learn more)

“Gold standard” is a common phrase meaning that something is good and trustworthy — but the actual gold standard, which started in the 1790s, didn’t work well at all. Gold standard economies went through manic boom-and-bust cycles and financial crises. Countries came out of the Great Depression of the 1930s as they moved off a rigid gold standard, and the last traces of the gold standard were abandoned in 1971. Real economies need credit and monetary policy for any sort of stability. Bitcoiners think that this is incorrect and immoral, and that bad ideas that didn’t work before will surely work again if they’re programmed well enough.”
David Gerard, Libra Shrugged: How Facebook Tried to Take Over the Money

“What Bitcoin does is run a computerised lottery, in a process called “mining.” Bitcoin miners guess a number. They take their guess, they combine it with a block of transactions that are waiting to be processed, and they do a simple calculation on them. If the calculation gives a small enough number, the miner wins six-and-a-quarter fresh new bitcoins! And their block of transactions is added to the public blockchain. The more guesses you make, the better your chances. In June 2020, Bitcoin miners were making 100 quintillion guesses every second. This used as much electricity as all of Austria.45 This is called “proof-of-work” — though it might better be termed “proof-of-waste.” Blocks come out approximately every ten minutes. If miners win coins too often, the difficulty goes up, to slow the system down — so the miners have to add more computers to compete. This results in spiraling electricity use — Bitcoin is, literally, anti-efficient. The point of all this waste is to secure the blockchain — the threat model is that nobody can change the blockchain without wasting at least as much electricity. The Bitcoin mining system is incredibly slow, and very hard to scale up. Bitcoin now consumes between 0.1% and 0.5% of all the electricity in the world — for the same seven transactions per second, worldwide, that it could do in 2009, when it was just running on Nakamoto’s desktop PC. Bitcoin is the most inefficient payment network in human history.”
David Gerard, Libra Shrugged: How Facebook Tried to Take Over the Money

“Blockchains don’t solve settlement and compliance issues — they’re only more efficient if they can bypass regulation. Libra could only be more efficient than existing systems as long as it could dodge regulation, and none of its competitors could.”
David Gerard, Libra Shrugged: How Facebook Tried to Take Over the Money



Is this you? Let us know. If not, help out and invite David to Goodreads.