George A. Reisch

George A. Reisch’s Followers (6)

member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo

George A. Reisch



Average rating: 3.79 · 1,379 ratings · 110 reviews · 14 distinct worksSimilar authors
Monty Python and Philosophy...

by
3.80 avg rating — 514 ratings — published 2006 — 10 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
Pink Floyd and Philosophy: ...

3.81 avg rating — 272 ratings — published 2010 — 7 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
Radiohead and Philosophy: F...

by
3.74 avg rating — 252 ratings — published 2009 — 8 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
Dexter and Philosophy: Mind...

by
3.83 avg rating — 218 ratings — published 2011 — 5 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
Bullshit and Philosophy

by
3.65 avg rating — 83 ratings — published 2006 — 4 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
How the Cold War Transforme...

4.76 avg rating — 21 ratings — published 2005 — 10 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
The Rolling Stones and Phil...

by
3.21 avg rating — 19 ratings — published 2011 — 5 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
The Politics of Paradigms: ...

really liked it 4.00 avg rating — 2 ratings3 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
Human Knowledge: A Classic ...

by
0.00 avg rating — 0 ratings — published 2014 — 3 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
The Humanistic Background o...

by
0.00 avg rating — 0 ratings2 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
More books by George A. Reisch…
Quotes by George A. Reisch  (?)
Quotes are added by the Goodreads community and are not verified by Goodreads. (Learn more)

“[Roger] Waters has suggested that empathy is the central theme of all the band[Pink Floyd]'s classic, mature works beginning with [the album] Meddle. Waters singles out the following lines from "Echoes": Strangers passing in the street / By chance two seperate glances meet / And I am you and what I see is me.”
George A. Reisch, Pink Floyd and Philosophy: Careful with that Axiom, Eugene!

“This raises the question, was Brian Cohen divine? Let’s take a look at his miracles. In Monty Python’s Life of Brian, each “miracle” Brian performs leads to greater conviction on the part of his followers that his every utterance is Divinely sanctioned. His first miracle is to be “taken up” into heaven, only to be spotted in full sprint moments later. For his next miracle, he causes a juniper bush to bring forth juniper berries. Later he miraculously restores the power of speech to Simon, a hermit of eighteen years (by landing on his foot, that is). As evidence of Brian’s divinity mounts, his words are received by the devoted throng as Divine revelation. His exasperated plea for the crowd to “fuck off ” is treated as an invitation to ritual: “How shall we fuck off, O Lord?”
George A. Reisch, Monty Python and Philosophy: Nudge Nudge, Think Think!

“Is God really real?”This is a perennial question for the philosophy of religion. Fortunately, the Pythons have answers to it. Perhaps too many answers. If we asked Arthur, King of the Britons, he would certainly testify that God exists, speaks English, and can’t stand people groveling, averting their eyes, ceaselessly apologizing, and deeming themselves unworthy. Yet when we begin inquiring into Monty Python’s The Meaning of Life, “there is some doubt” about whether God is really real, or, to put it more philosophically, there is doubt over whether God’s existence can be established through a valid argument. There is a long philosophical tradition of constructing rational arguments for the existence and attributes of God, and an equally long skeptical tradition of deconstructing those same arguments. The Pythons have been exemplary participants in the latter tradition, either through parody, or by echoing in a funnier and more succinct way the skeptical arguments of such philosophical predecessors as Scottish philosopher David Hume (1711-1776).”
George A. Reisch, Monty Python and Philosophy: Nudge Nudge, Think Think!



Is this you? Let us know. If not, help out and invite George to Goodreads.