National Security Council

National Security Council’s Followers

None yet.

National Security Council



Average rating: 2.92 · 12 ratings · 1 review · 13 distinct works
National Security Strategy ...

liked it 3.00 avg rating — 3 ratings — published 2010
Rate this book
Clear rating
Cyberspace Policy Review

liked it 3.00 avg rating — 1 rating — published 2011
Rate this book
Clear rating
NSSM 200 The Kissinger Repo...

liked it 3.00 avg rating — 1 rating
Rate this book
Clear rating
US Strategy for Addressing ...

it was ok 2.00 avg rating — 1 rating
Rate this book
Clear rating
National Strategy for Victo...

0.00 avg rating — 0 ratings — published 2012
Rate this book
Clear rating
National Strategy for Count...

0.00 avg rating — 0 ratings — published 2012
Rate this book
Clear rating
NSSM 200 The Kissinger Repo...

0.00 avg rating — 0 ratings2 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
Playbook For Early Response...

0.00 avg rating — 0 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
National Strategy for Count...

0.00 avg rating — 0 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
National Strategy for Comba...

0.00 avg rating — 0 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
More books by National Security Council…
Quotes by National Security Council  (?)
Quotes are added by the Goodreads community and are not verified by Goodreads. (Learn more)

“The U.S. economy will require large and increasing amounts of minerals from abroad, especially from less developed countries. That fact gives the U.S. enhanced interest in the political, economic, and social stability of the supplying countries. Wherever a lessening of population pressures through reduced birth rates can increase the prospects for such stability, population policy becomes relevant to resource supplies and to the economic interests of the United States.
...
Assistance for population moderation should give primary emphasis to the largest and fastest growing developing countries where there is special U.S. political and strategic interest. Those countries are: India, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Nigeria, Mexico, Indonesia, Brazil, the Philippines, Thailand, Egypt, Turkey, Ethiopia and Columbia
...
At the same time, the U.S. will look to the multilateral agencies, especially the U.N. Fund for Population Activities which already has projects in over 80 countries to increase population assistance on a broader basis with increased U.S. contributions. This is desirable in terms of U.S. interests and necessary in political terms in the United Nations.
...
young people can more readily be persuaded to attack the legal institutions of the government or real property of the ‘establishment,’ ‘imperialists,’ multinational corporations, or other — often foreign — influences blamed for their troubles.
...
Without diminishing in any way the effort to reach these adults, the obvious increased focus of attention should be to change the attitudes of the next generation, those who are now in elementary school or younger.
...
There is also the danger that some LDC [less developed countries] leaders will see developed country pressures for family planning as a form of economic or racial imperialism; this could well create a serious backlash.… The U.S. can help to minimize charges of an imperialist motivation behind its support of population activities by repeatedly asserting that such support derives from a concern with:

(a) The right of the individual couple to determine freely and responsibly the number and spacing of children and to have information, education, and means to do so; and

(b) The fundamental social and economic development of poor countries in which rapid population growth is both a contributing cause and a consequence of widespread poverty.”
National Security Council, The Kissinger Report: NSSM-200 Implications of Worldwide Population Growth for U.S. Security Interests



Is this you? Let us know. If not, help out and invite National to Goodreads.