Anne McClintock
Born
in Harare, Zimbabwe
August 27, 1954
Website
|
Imperial Leather: Race, Gender, and Sexuality in the Colonial Contest
—
published
1995
—
14 editions
|
|
|
Theories of Race and Racism: A Reader
by
—
published
1999
—
17 editions
|
|
|
Dangerous Liaisons: Gender, Nation, and Postcolonial Perspectives (Volume 11) (Studies in Classical Philology)
by
—
published
1997
—
5 editions
|
|
|
Postkolonial feminism, vol. 1
by
—
published
2011
|
|
|
Double Crossings: Madness, Sexuality and Imperialism
—
published
2001
—
3 editions
|
|
|
سیمون دوبووار
|
|
|
Feministiska konstteorier (Skriftserien Kairos, #6)
by
—
published
2000
|
|
|
Social Text 37
—
published
1994
—
3 editions
|
|
|
Screwing the System
|
|
|
Untitled Book on Sex Workers
|
|
“From the outset, people's experiences of desire and rage, memory and power, community and revolt are inflected and mediated by the institutions through which they find their meaning - and which they, in turn, transform.”
― Imperial Leather: Race, Gender, and Sexuality in the Colonial Contest
― Imperial Leather: Race, Gender, and Sexuality in the Colonial Contest
“At this point, another trope makes its appearance. It can be called the invention of anachronistic space, and it reached full authority as an administrative and regulatory technology in the late Victorian era. Within this trope, the agency of women, the colonized and the industrial working class are disavowed and projected onto anachronistic space: prehistoric, atavistic and irrational, inherently out of place in the historical time of modernity.
According to the colonial version of this trope, imperial progress across the space of empire is figured as a journey backward in time to an anachronistic moment of prehistory. By extension, the return journey to Europe is seen as rehearsing the evolutionary logic of historical progress, forward and upward to the apogee of the Enlightenment in the European metropolis. Geographical difference across space is figured as a historical difference across time. The ideologue J.-M. Degerando captured this notion concisely: “The philosophical traveller, sailing to the ends of the earth, is in fact travelling in time; he is exploring the past.” 46 The stubborn and threatening heterogeneity of the colonies was contained and disciplined not as socially or geographically different from Europe and thus equally valid, but as temporally different and thus as irrevocably superannuated by history. Hegel, for example, perhaps the most influential philosophical proponent of this notion, figured Africa as inhabiting not simply a different geographical space but a different temporal zone, surviving anachronistically within the time of history. Africa, announces Hegel, “is no Historical part of the world … it has no movement or development to exhibit.” Africa came to be seen as the colonial paradigm of anachronistic space, a land perpetually out of time in modernity, marooned and historically abandoned. Africa was a fetish-land, inhabited by cannibals, dervishes and witch doctors, abandoned in prehistory at the precise moment before the Weltgeist (as the cunning agent of Reason) manifested itself in history.”
― Imperial Leather: Race, Gender, and Sexuality in the Colonial Contest
According to the colonial version of this trope, imperial progress across the space of empire is figured as a journey backward in time to an anachronistic moment of prehistory. By extension, the return journey to Europe is seen as rehearsing the evolutionary logic of historical progress, forward and upward to the apogee of the Enlightenment in the European metropolis. Geographical difference across space is figured as a historical difference across time. The ideologue J.-M. Degerando captured this notion concisely: “The philosophical traveller, sailing to the ends of the earth, is in fact travelling in time; he is exploring the past.” 46 The stubborn and threatening heterogeneity of the colonies was contained and disciplined not as socially or geographically different from Europe and thus equally valid, but as temporally different and thus as irrevocably superannuated by history. Hegel, for example, perhaps the most influential philosophical proponent of this notion, figured Africa as inhabiting not simply a different geographical space but a different temporal zone, surviving anachronistically within the time of history. Africa, announces Hegel, “is no Historical part of the world … it has no movement or development to exhibit.” Africa came to be seen as the colonial paradigm of anachronistic space, a land perpetually out of time in modernity, marooned and historically abandoned. Africa was a fetish-land, inhabited by cannibals, dervishes and witch doctors, abandoned in prehistory at the precise moment before the Weltgeist (as the cunning agent of Reason) manifested itself in history.”
― Imperial Leather: Race, Gender, and Sexuality in the Colonial Contest
“Pushing upstream, the colonials are figured as traveling backward into anachronistic space: “Going up that river was like travelling back to the earliest beginnings of the world…. We were wanderers on prehistoric earth…. We were travelling in the night of first ages, of those ages that are gone.” Within the trope of anachronistic space, the boilerman’s mimetic failure is less a discursive dilemma than a familiar element of the colonial progress narrative. Inhabiting the cusp of prehistory and imperial modernity, the “improved specimen” is seen as the living measure of how far Africans must still travel to attain modernity. In other words, the slippage between difference and identity is rendered non-contradictory by being projected onto the axis of time as a natural function of imperial progress.”
― Imperial Leather: Race, Gender, and Sexuality in the Colonial Contest
― Imperial Leather: Race, Gender, and Sexuality in the Colonial Contest
Is this you? Let us know. If not, help out and invite Anne to Goodreads.




























