,
Discover new books on Goodreads
See if your friends have read any of Donald O. Hebb's books
Donald O. Hebb

Donald O. Hebb’s Followers (8)

member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo

Donald O. Hebb



Average rating: 4.13 · 23 ratings · 2 reviews · 7 distinct works
El problema mente-cerebro. ...

by
really liked it 4.00 avg rating — 21 ratings — published 1980 — 10 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
Essay on Mind

4.20 avg rating — 10 ratings — published 1980 — 9 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
Textbook of Psychology, Tex...

by
3.67 avg rating — 3 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
The Neuropsychology of Lash...

by
4.50 avg rating — 2 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
The Organization of Behavior

it was amazing 5.00 avg rating — 1 rating2 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
Psicologia. Segunda edición

0.00 avg rating — 0 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
States of Consciousness

by
0.00 avg rating — 0 ratings — published 1981
Rate this book
Clear rating
More books by Donald O. Hebb…
Quotes by Donald O. Hebb  (?)
Quotes are added by the Goodreads community and are not verified by Goodreads. (Learn more)

“Psychology and philosophy were divorced some time ago, but like other divorced couples they still have problems in common.”
Donald O. Hebb, Essay on Mind

“Why do we not accept ESP as a psychological fact? Rhine has offered enough evidence to have convinced us on almost any other issue... Personally, I do not accept ESP for a moment, because it does not make sense. My external criteria, both of physics and of physiology, say that ESP is not a fact despite the behavioral evidence that has been reported. I cannot see what other basis my colleagues have for rejecting it... Rhine may still turn out to be right, improbable as I think that is, and my own rejection of his view is - in the literal sense - prejudice.”
Donald Hebb

“Thus also, T. S. Kuhn (1962): “I am, for example, acutely aware of the difficulties created by saying that when Aristotle and Galileo looked at swinging stones, the one saw constrained fall, the second a pendulum” (p.220). But the difficulties are verbal. The sensations were in principle the same, the perceptions differed. As the ambiguous figure shows, the same sensations may give rise to different perceptions. Perception is a cortical process, a first stage of thought, and consequently interpretive; both Aristotle and Galileo saw the same thing—swinging stones—but in effect thought about it differently, which should surprise no one.”
Donald O. Hebb, Essay on Mind



Is this you? Let us know. If not, help out and invite Donald to Goodreads.