Régine Pernoud

Régine Pernoud’s Followers (121)

member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo

Régine Pernoud


Born
in Château-Chinon, Nièvre, France
June 17, 1909

Died
April 22, 1998

Genre


Régine Pernoud (17 June 1909 in Château-Chinon, Nièvre - 22 April 1998 in Paris) was a historian and medievalist. She received an award from the Académie française. She is known for writing extensively about Joan of Arc.

Average rating: 3.98 · 3,079 ratings · 378 reviews · 146 distinct worksSimilar authors
Joan of Arc: Her Story

by
4.03 avg rating — 670 ratings — published 1946 — 26 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
Those Terrible Middle Ages!...

by
3.98 avg rating — 543 ratings — published 1977 — 25 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
Aliénor d'Aquitaine

4.08 avg rating — 410 ratings — published 1965 — 42 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
Joan of Arc: By Herself and...

4.21 avg rating — 296 ratings — published 1962 — 26 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
Women in the Days of the Ca...

3.92 avg rating — 303 ratings — published 1980 — 18 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
Templars: Knights of Christ

3.68 avg rating — 202 ratings — published 1974 — 31 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
Héloïse et Abélard

3.76 avg rating — 100 ratings — published 1967 — 19 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
Hildegarde de Bingen

by
3.64 avg rating — 103 ratings — published 1994 — 21 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
The Retrial of Joan of Arc:...

4.32 avg rating — 62 ratings — published 1953 — 8 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
La femme au temps des Crois...

4.15 avg rating — 60 ratings — published 1990 — 14 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
More books by Régine Pernoud…
Quotes by Régine Pernoud  (?)
Quotes are added by the Goodreads community and are not verified by Goodreads. (Learn more)

“People's imaginations have continued to work, right up to our own day; hence the incredible crop of fanciful allegations attributing to the Templars every kind of esoteric rite and belief, from the most ancient to the most vulgar, every variety of alchemical or magical knowledge, all kinds of initiation and affiliation rituals, those already in existence at the time and those yet to be conceived—in a word, all the "secrets" devised the slake the thirst for mystery inherent in human nature. This thirst, by a kind of instinctual reaction, seems never to be stronger than in those eras when people appear to reject all mysteries: let us recall that it was in Descartes' own day that trials for witchcraft were most numerous; that it was at the beginning of the rationalistic eighteenth century that Freemasonry was born; that our own scientific twentieth century is equally the century in which sects have proliferated, occultism has undergone a renaissance, and so on.”
Régine Pernoud, Templars: Knights of Christ

“She raised (all) spirits towards the hope of better times”
Régine Pernoud, Joan of Arc: By Herself and Her Witnesses

“Marx’s Manifesto, pub­lished in 1847, reflects the state of historical science of the period. It fixes the thirteenth century as the beginning of the “battle against feudal absolutism” and attributes to the bourgeoisie “an essentially revolutionary role” in history. Did the bourgeoisie not uproot the countryside from a “state of torpor and latent barbarism”? These are all propositions that are today [1977] unacceptable for the historian; those who continue to perpetuate such errors of vocabulary, which are intellectually necessary if one wants to maintain at any price the feudalism-bourgeoisie-proletariat, prolong an am­biguity just as erroneous as the continued use of the term "Gothic ” during the era of Marx. In other words, the Marxist historians, who speak of feudalism destroyed by the French revolution, make one think of those ecclesiastics who see in the Second Vatican Council the "end of the Constantinian period” — as if nothing had happened, in more than sixteen hundred years, between Constantine and Vatican II.”
Régine Pernoud, Those Terrible Middle Ages!: Debunking the Myths

Topics Mentioning This Author