,
Paul Cohen

Paul Cohen’s Followers (6)

member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo

Paul Cohen


Born
Long Branch, New Jersey, The United States
Website

Genre


Paul Joseph Cohen (April 2, 1934 – March 23, 2007) was an American mathematician best known for his proof of the independence of the continuum hypothesis and the axiom of choice from Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory, the most widely accepted axiomatization of set theory.

Average rating: 4.0 · 90 ratings · 14 reviews · 72 distinct worksSimilar authors
Set Theory and the Continuu...

4.22 avg rating — 49 ratings — published 1966 — 6 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
Water Coolant Technology of...

4.33 avg rating — 3 ratings — published 1980 — 3 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
The Asme Handbook on Water ...

it was amazing 5.00 avg rating — 1 rating — published 1989 — 3 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
La teoria degli insiemi e l...

it was amazing 5.00 avg rating — 1 rating — published 1973
Rate this book
Clear rating
SECRETS REVEALED: TO MAKING...

really liked it 4.00 avg rating — 1 rating
Rate this book
Clear rating
Day Trading Strategies: Adv...

liked it 3.00 avg rating — 1 rating2 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
Forex Trading for Beginners...

it was ok 2.00 avg rating — 1 rating
Rate this book
Clear rating
America's Scientific Treasu...

by
0.00 avg rating — 0 ratings — published 2001
Rate this book
Clear rating
Freedom's Moment: An Essay ...

0.00 avg rating — 0 ratings — published 1997 — 2 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
Au crépuscule des jours

0.00 avg rating — 0 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
More books by Paul Cohen…
Quotes by Paul Cohen  (?)
Quotes are added by the Goodreads community and are not verified by Goodreads. (Learn more)

“To the average mathematician who merely wants to know his work is securely based, the most appealing choice is to avoid difficulties by means of Hilbert's program. Here one regards mathematics as a formal game and one is only concerned with the question of consistency ... . The Realist position is probably the one which most mathematicians would prefer to take. It is not until he becomes aware of some of the difficulties in set theory that he would even begin to question it. If these difficulties particularly upset him, he will rush to the shelter of Formalism, while his normal position will be somewhere between the two, trying to enjoy the best of two worlds.”
Paul Cohen

“To the average mathematician who merely wants to know his work is securely based, the most appealing choice is to avoid difficulties by means of Hilbert's program. Here one regards mathematics as a formal game and one is only concerned with the question of consistency ... . The Realist position is probably the one which most mathematicians would prefer to take. It is not until he becomes aware of some of the difficulties in set theory that he would even begin to question it. If these difficulties particularly upset him, he will rush to the shelter of Formalism, while his normal position will be somewhere between the two, trying to enjoy the best of two worlds.”
Paul Joseph Cohen

“Historically, mathematics does not seem to enjoy tolerating undecidable propositions. It may elevate such a proposition to the status of an axiom, and through repeated exposure it may become quite widely accepted. This is more or less the case with the Axiom of Choice. I would characterize this tendency quite simply as opportunism. It is of course an impersonal and quite constructive opportunism. Nevertheless, the feeling that mathematics is a worthwhile and relevant activity should not completely erase in our minds an honest appreciation of the problems which beset us.”
Paul Cohen



Is this you? Let us know. If not, help out and invite Paul to Goodreads.