date
newest »
newest »
message 1:
by
Eric
(new)
Oct 29, 2021 08:39AM
Interesting take. If you think about it, branded trash is a form of advertising. Sure, you see a McDonald's bag on the ground and immediately think about the A-hole who left it there, but you also think "I wonder when the McRib is coming back?" So, making companies pay a fine for their trash advertising isn't that far fetched. If they want to avoid the fines, they just use non-branded, generic bags and containers.
reply
|
flag
Really like this. Maybe a good way to prevent companies from just passing responsibility onto the consumers and instead come up with waste-reduction ideas that anyone can follow.
I just wanted to point out that people aren't always the ones doing the littering. When garbage is collected during a windy period it can blow away without reaching the inside of the truck. This all coincided with the loss of two jobs on every garbage truck due to the advent of the One Armed Bandit(OAB). A truck designed to collect rubbish without the need for additional staff, with it's hydraulic arm that lifts and tips the bin up and overhead into a hole in the top of the compactor.
Before the OAB was invented the garbage collection team was a truck driver and two garbologists who loaded wheely bins on the back. If anything flew about they picked it up. This wasn't as frequent an occurrence as with the OAB because the chute that swallowed the contents of the wheely bin was protected from the worst of the wind by it's design.
The method the OAB arm lifts the bin up high, it rotates upside down and the contents fall into the compactor chute. Strong winds just blow light loose rubbish out again, the truck driver does NOT get out of his truck to collect any of it.
I love your idea Max, but Eric is right those buggers will just use generic packaging to avoid such fines or taxes.




