Tamara’s review of Apocalypse 1626 Part I: The Persian Tribute > Likes and Comments

1 like · 
Comments Showing 1-1 of 1 (1 new)    post a comment »
dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by Harry (new)

Harry Han Thank you for sharing your perspective.

The word Apocalypse in Apocalypse 1626 is not used in the modern genre sense of an immediate, world-ending catastrophe. It is, first, a historical translation: Tianqi (天启), the reign title of the Ming emperor, literally means “revelation” or “apocalypse” in its original Greek sense—unveiling rather than destruction.

In this novel, the apocalypse is not a single spectacular event, but a civilizational turning point. The explosion, the secret technologies, and the conflicts are not meant to function as instant doomsday triggers. They represent a missed window of transformation—an opportunity a civilization failed to recognize or accept.

The true consequences unfold gradually: the collapse of the late Ming, the wars that followed with catastrophic population loss, and ultimately the long arc of decline that extended into the modern era. This is an apocalypse that does not arrive all at once, but one whose effects echo for centuries.

I understand this may differ from conventional expectations of the genre, but the story intentionally explores apocalypse as a slow, structural failure of a civilization rather than an immediate end-of-the-world event.


back to top