Rosh’s review of The Butterfly's Treasure > Likes and Comments

61 likes · 
Comments Showing 1-38 of 38 (38 new)    post a comment »
dateUp arrow    newest »

Shelley's Book Nook What a shame. The cover art is lovely. Fabulous review, Rosh. 🤗💕


message 2: by Berengaria (new)

Berengaria Oh that's a shame. What would you think of a child who never asked questions during a story? They just listen and follow along silently.


message 3: by Sarah (new)

Sarah A fair and fantastic review, sweet Rosh!! 🥰❤️😘 I'm so sorry this was disappointing!! 😭🫶🏼 But at least the illustrations were good! 😅🤭 I hope your next read will be a million times better!! 💕


message 4: by Dale (new)

Dale Harcombe Disappointing book but a helpful, fair review Rosh,💕


message 5: by Nat (new)

Nat Awh, what a letdown. It’s a shame the story wasn’t executed well, but I’m glad the illustrations made it a somewhat bearable experience. Hope the next one delivers 🫶🏻


Saranya ⋆☕︎ ˖ Ahh so sorry this was a disappointment, Rosh. Glad that it’s visually stunning but the logic gaps might make it a tough read for curious kids. Those watercolors sound beautiful, though! Great review!<3<3


message 7: by A (new)

A Mac I recently read a collection of MG stories like this, where they all were okay stories, but you just had to accept the coincidences and zero explanations. I know it's for young readers, but there has to be a LITTLE logic. The illustrations do look lovely, though. Wonderful review, Rosh!


message 8: by Srivalli (new)

Srivalli (Semi-Hiatus) Oh, wow! Hand-painted illustrations sound amazing! If only the story was as good or least better structured to do justice to the artwork. Terrific review, Rosh. 💝
I sure don't get spring vibes from the cover. 😬


message 9: by Thibault (new)

Thibault Busschots You’re really going through a few books that don’t end up meeting your expectations. I can deal with some coincidences, life is full of them anyway. But too many coincidences is not very realistic and can definitely take you out of a story. A cigarette being deemed fine in a children’s book definitely feels very outdated. That seems like a big no no. Fair and honest review, Rosh.


Nicole Leigh Reads Bummer that the storyline didn't live up to the gorgeous and amazing artwork! Great and thoughtful review, Rosh :)


message 11: by Kealyn (new)

Kealyn I'm glad the illustrations truly delivered. Sometimes it can enhance the story. But I'm sorry in this case it didn't and rather failed.


Dorie  - Cats&Books :) Uh oh, two 2* in a row - I hope your current read is great


message 13: by Mary-Lisa (new)

Mary-Lisa Russo Sorry this one was disappointing, Rosh! Hope the next one is a satisfying read. 💗💗💗


message 14: by Persephone's Pomegranate (last edited Feb 26, 2026 08:07AM) (new)

Persephone's Pomegranate Hey, at least the illustrations are good. But why is there a cigarette in a children's book? lol
Sorry this was such a letdown, Rosh. Great review, as always.


message 15: by Mark (new)

Mark  Porton Shame this one was a flat experience for you Rosh, you're right, the premise sounds good. Anyway onto your next read, great review :))


message 16: by Nika (new)

Nika The idea of three unlikely characters coming together looked quite promising. Sorry this story felt flat. At least the illustrations were good.
Fair, helpful review, Rosh! 🥰


message 17: by Rosh (new)

Rosh Shelley's Book Nook wrote: "What a shame. The cover art is lovely. Fabulous review, Rosh. 🤗💕"

Thanks, Shelley! 💖 Yes, the art was really lovely.


message 18: by Rosh (new)

Rosh Berengaria wrote: "Oh that's a shame. What would you think of a child who never asked questions during a story? They just listen and follow along silently."

Interesting question, B. I wouldn't judge such a child at all. Not all children are verbal about their thoughts. I was one of them. I used to think of questions only on my head. 😊


message 19: by Rosh (new)

Rosh Sarah wrote: "A fair and fantastic review, sweet Rosh!! 🥰❤️😘 I'm so sorry this was disappointing!! 😭🫶🏼 But at least the illustrations were good! 😅🤭 I hope your next read will be a million times better!! 💕"

Thanks so much, dear Sarah! 💖


message 20: by Rosh (new)

Rosh Dale wrote: "Disappointing book but a helpful, fair review Rosh,💕"

Thanks much, Dale! 💖


message 21: by Rosh (last edited Feb 26, 2026 11:38AM) (new)

Rosh Nat wrote: "Awh, what a letdown. It’s a shame the story wasn’t executed well, but I’m glad the illustrations made it a somewhat bearable experience. Hope the next one delivers 🫶🏻"

The illustrations did help a lot. Thanks, Nat! 💖


message 22: by Rosh (new)

Rosh Saranya ⋆☕︎ ˖ wrote: "Ahh so sorry this was a disappointment, Rosh. Glad that it’s visually stunning but the logic gaps might make it a tough read for curious kids. Those watercolors sound beautiful, though! Great revie..."

Thanks much, Saranya! 💖 A few logic gaps can be explained away but this was a bit too full of gaps. 😬 The art was the saving grace.


message 23: by Rosh (new)

Rosh A wrote: "I recently read a collection of MG stories like this, where they all were okay stories, but you just had to accept the coincidences and zero explanations. I know it's for young readers, but there h..."

Exactly, A! There's a minimal level of logic that's mandatory. You can't let too many things stay unclarified. Thank you!


message 24: by Rosh (new)

Rosh Srivalli wrote: "Oh, wow! Hand-painted illustrations sound amazing! If only the story was as good or least better structured to do justice to the artwork. Terrific review, Rosh. 💝
I sure don't get spring vibes fro..."


Yeah,I was so impressed that they were hand-painted. It took the artist over a year, imagine! It's so sad that the story didn't match up.
Thanks so much, Sri! 💖
I didn't find anything spring-y or Easter-y anywhere in the story! 😬


message 25: by Rosh (new)

Rosh Thibault wrote: "You’re really going through a few books that don’t end up meeting your expectations. I can deal with some coincidences, life is full of them anyway. But too many coincidences is not very realistic ..."

It's such a bad streak, Thibault. Even classic short stories and children's books are turning out to be duds. 😢
I would expect a simpler story in a picture book but this one really stretched the simplicity.
I didn't even expect a cigarette to pop up in a children's book! 🤷🏻‍♀️
Thank you so much.


message 26: by Rosh (new)

Rosh Nicole Leigh Reads wrote: "Bummer that the storyline didn't live up to the gorgeous and amazing artwork! Great and thoughtful review, Rosh :)"

Thanks much, Nicole! It's really sad. Such a missed opportunity!


message 27: by Rosh (new)

Rosh Kealyn wrote: "I'm glad the illustrations truly delivered. Sometimes it can enhance the story. But I'm sorry in this case it didn't and rather failed."

Thanks, Kealyn! I guess illustrations alone cannot save a book.


message 28: by Rosh (new)

Rosh Dorie - Cats&Books :) wrote: "Uh oh, two 2* in a row - I hope your current read is great"

Oh, quite a few in a row, Dorie! I've been having quite a bad streak. 😕


message 29: by Rosh (new)

Rosh Mary-Lisa wrote: "Sorry this one was disappointing, Rosh! Hope the next one is a satisfying read. 💗💗💗"

Thanks much, Mary-Lisa! 💖


message 30: by Rosh (new)

Rosh Persephone's Pomegranate wrote: "Hey, at least the illustrations are good. But why is there a cigarette in a children's book? lol
Sorry this was such a letdown, Rosh. Great review, as always."


Thanks, Perse! That's my question as well. A children's book shouldn't even mention cigarettes.


message 31: by Rosh (new)

Rosh Mark wrote: "Shame this one was a flat experience for you Rosh, you're right, the premise sounds good. Anyway onto your next read, great review :))"

Thanks much, Mark! 😊 The premise sounded quite good. So sad it didn't match up to the potential!


message 32: by Rosh (new)

Rosh Nika wrote: "The idea of three unlikely characters coming together looked quite promising. Sorry this story felt flat. At least the illustrations were good.
Fair, helpful review, Rosh! 🥰"


Thanks so much, Nika! 🤗 That coming together of unlikely characters is such a good idea usually in fiction.


message 33: by Christy (new)

Christy fictional_traits 3-8 years seem like quite an expansive age range to cater for. Perhaps that contributed to some of the haphazard nature of the story.


message 34: by Jayne (new)

Jayne Your 2-star review says it all. Great honest review, Rosh. I hope you love your next one.


message 35: by Rachel (new)

Rachel Hanes So sorry that you didn’t enjoy this story. However, I’m glad that the illustrations were nice to look at. Terrific review, Rosh! 💗


message 36: by Rosh (new)

Rosh Christy wrote: "3-8 years seem like quite an expansive age range to cater for. Perhaps that contributed to some of the haphazard nature of the story."

I always thought the same, Christy. But for some weird reason, children's books are always aimed at ages 4-8. Some books handle the range successfully as younger kids can enjoy the book while listening to it. But this one didn't work both ways.


message 37: by Rosh (new)

Rosh Jayne wrote: "Your 2-star review says it all. Great honest review, Rosh. I hope you love your next one."

Thanks much, Jayne!


message 38: by Rosh (new)

Rosh Rachel wrote: "So sorry that you didn’t enjoy this story. However, I’m glad that the illustrations were nice to look at. Terrific review, Rosh! 💗"

Thanks so much, Rachel! 💖 The illustrations saved my overall rating.


back to top