Greenland > Likes and Comments
3 likes · Like
Greenland has "marbles" of other type. He's greedy about those "marbles". But he says it's about "national security".
Dwight Eisenhower and Winston Churchill have crowned Trump with The Kamala Harris Dingleberry Laurel Wreath for his efforts in destroying NATO.
That long wreath knocks out two rabbits in one single blow...
However, Putin ( I know you really don't like him) is leading in the Arctic infrastructure (military included). So, Trump is just trying to catch up.
Hi there David. Maybe you have something to tell us about Iran...in next few hours or days
Iran, Owlseyes?
Unless there is American military intervention on the ground, the IRGC regime will remain in power, murdering tens of thousands of its own citizens.
.
The IRGC may temper the current threat to its existence by agreeing to some sort of long drawn-out diplomatic consultations until Trump’s wave of egotistic narcissism subsides and he loses interest in the situation.
.
The sum of my thoughts on the current Iranian situation: the murder of tens of thousands of Iranians may temporarily subside, but the IRGC will simply outlast Trump’s addiction to the headlines and continue the slaughter at a later date.
Ooo. "Unless". The only way to solve the problem is "boots on the ground".
Situation looks scary, as the US military buildup around Iran continues. Some speculate of WWIII, thus other nations getting involved.
Your take doesn't contemplate (Iran) internal divisions.
Thanks anyway.
P.S. Trump will provide the USA people with a candy: total UFO disclosure 👽👽👽 ...Las Vegas is on the list, for sure. (Besides the Epstein list.)
David,
It seems the Ayatollah is gone. Most likely someone (of the same kind) will replace him.
"Mission accomplished" for Trump & Bibi? I guess, no. The Hormuz Strait got shut. How about the oil fields? (..)
"Let's go home", will Trump say?
Or, "let's deploy troops"?
I read somewhere this: "The United States may have simply lit the match for holy war."
Nothing will have been accomplished unless the Islamic regime is completely replaced.
.
That is unlikely to happen without troops on the ground.
.
A “Holy” war? What a silly conjecture.
Ouch. Totally amazed. Vietnam come again? Iraq... Afghanistan? What a nightmare.
Iran under the Islamic regime is a nightmare
Very true, nightmare regime. But it seems David has changed. I recall David complaining about Kissinger and the "agent orange" usage in Vietnam.
Has David become an interventionist (abroad)? (..) After 20 years in Afghanistan the US troops made a shameful withdrawal, under Biden. Sorry to recall.
The US had no business getting involved in Vietnam. It was not a threat.
.
Iran and the IRGC?
.
Yes! a thousand times!
Alyosha, the IRGC defies simple logic.
.
That seems to suit your lack of coherence very well.
back to top
date
newest »
newest »
message 1:
by
Owlseyes
(new)
Jan 21, 2026 05:09AM
Greenland has "marbles" of other type. He's greedy about those "marbles". But he says it's about "national security".
reply
|
flag
Dwight Eisenhower and Winston Churchill have crowned Trump with The Kamala Harris Dingleberry Laurel Wreath for his efforts in destroying NATO.
That long wreath knocks out two rabbits in one single blow...However, Putin ( I know you really don't like him) is leading in the Arctic infrastructure (military included). So, Trump is just trying to catch up.
Hi there David. Maybe you have something to tell us about Iran...in next few hours or days
Iran, Owlseyes?Unless there is American military intervention on the ground, the IRGC regime will remain in power, murdering tens of thousands of its own citizens.
.
The IRGC may temper the current threat to its existence by agreeing to some sort of long drawn-out diplomatic consultations until Trump’s wave of egotistic narcissism subsides and he loses interest in the situation.
.
The sum of my thoughts on the current Iranian situation: the murder of tens of thousands of Iranians may temporarily subside, but the IRGC will simply outlast Trump’s addiction to the headlines and continue the slaughter at a later date.
Ooo. "Unless". The only way to solve the problem is "boots on the ground". Situation looks scary, as the US military buildup around Iran continues. Some speculate of WWIII, thus other nations getting involved.
Your take doesn't contemplate (Iran) internal divisions.
Thanks anyway.
P.S. Trump will provide the USA people with a candy: total UFO disclosure 👽👽👽 ...Las Vegas is on the list, for sure. (Besides the Epstein list.)
David,It seems the Ayatollah is gone. Most likely someone (of the same kind) will replace him.
"Mission accomplished" for Trump & Bibi? I guess, no. The Hormuz Strait got shut. How about the oil fields? (..)
"Let's go home", will Trump say?
Or, "let's deploy troops"?
I read somewhere this: "The United States may have simply lit the match for holy war."
Nothing will have been accomplished unless the Islamic regime is completely replaced. .
That is unlikely to happen without troops on the ground.
.
A “Holy” war? What a silly conjecture.
Ouch. Totally amazed. Vietnam come again? Iraq... Afghanistan? What a nightmare.
Iran under the Islamic regime is a nightmare
Very true, nightmare regime. But it seems David has changed. I recall David complaining about Kissinger and the "agent orange" usage in Vietnam. Has David become an interventionist (abroad)? (..) After 20 years in Afghanistan the US troops made a shameful withdrawal, under Biden. Sorry to recall.
The US had no business getting involved in Vietnam. It was not a threat..
Iran and the IRGC?
.
Yes! a thousand times!
Alyosha, the IRGC defies simple logic. .
That seems to suit your lack of coherence very well.
