Stuart’s review of What We Can Know > Likes and Comments

A very comprehensive review yet it doesn't give much away. That's quite a feat.
I like your paragraph on Vivian. I wasn't sure if hers was a positive or a negative portrayal though. As in, I was clear that McEwan was skewering 'types' like Francis and Geoffrey, even Tom Metcalfe a little too. And some contemporary women writers in the character of Mary Sheldrake perhaps, but what was he saying by creating Vivian. I picked up on the 'Out, damn spot' reference too, and she is ruthless and manipulative at times—almost the equal of Lady Macbeth. I just wasn't sure if McEwan means us to despise her or admire her. Did you read Lessons? The main woman character in that was also ruthless and manipulative. And come to think of it, the main male character was a lot like Tom Metcalfe.

I thought she was too self-aware to be ruthless and manipulative. Also I don’t think she was either. She knew her flaws but felt no need to address them. Especially if self-interest was served - in the Faustian sense. Her guilt was over this, including her passive complicity in “the central act” (still trying to avoid spoilers!). I don’t think positive or negative come into McEwan’s purpose of her portrayal. Honesty more. Interesting that you suggest McEwan had a purpose for her character and wanted her judged. I didn’t see it that way. I thought he empathised with her, warts and all.

Well, I'm comforted that you didn't see it that way. With McEwan, I'm always looking for the devil in the detail;-)

Haha. Yes he can be sly. Sounds like you liked Vivian also.

Great review, Stuart.
I felt the same: the settings were wonderfully drawn, and I really liked Vivian.

Thanks Pedro. I’ll check out your review.

I forgot I’d already read it. Very entertaining.

Intriguing review Stu. I’ll have to give this one a shot for sure! Thank you :)