Julie In Wonderland’s review of Project Hail Mary > Likes and Comments

4947 likes · 
Comments Showing 1-50 of 1,019 (1019 new)    post a comment »

Julie In Wonderland Bibi wrote: "...This is not a book but a wish fulfilment of a childish sci-fi fantasy Andy Weir must have thought up during one boring physics class... "
Ikr! It was embarrassing.


message 2: by Myles (new)

Myles Donohue It’s actually shocking how insufferable this book is


message 3: by Christine (new)

Christine Hudson I like your review more than the book itself!


Julie In Wonderland Myles wrote: "It’s actually shocking how insufferable this book is"
Right? It took an immense amount of patience out of me not to dnf it.


Julie In Wonderland Christine wrote: "I like your review more than the book itself!" Thanks lol 😂 btw what a gorgeous himb you got there. So pretty. 😍


message 6: by Sarah (new)

Sarah Thank you for restoring my faith in Goodreads’ reviews. This book and the adoration shown for it are completely outside of my comprehension.


message 7: by Sandra (new)

Sandra Lindqvist Thank you! Been scrolling and scrolling to find someone else who disliked this book. (DNF at 120 pages.) I’m not alone!!!


message 8: by Chris (new)

Chris "Andy Weir would have us think she's a real human woman but I bet she's a robot and Andy Weir doesn't even know it." - Amazing, this is brutal lol. You are 100% correct, this book sucks.


Reid Page-McTurner I’m 45 pages in and the level of cringe and bad writing is… it’s at an all time high. I dunno If I can do this.


message 10: by Hendrik (new)

Hendrik I actually gave it 3.5 stars for the think-along problem-solving, but I love your review. Everything you say is true. The story is based in hard science which causes a huge disconnect when the characters are incredibly unbelievable. If the whole setting were more absurd and fantastical to begin with it would have worked better. My suspense of disbelief was strong enough for the cartoony human characters but I just couldn't take that he had less trouble communicating with an alien than you would have with any foreign human on earth.


message 11: by Kevin (new)

Kevin I liked the book but got a kick out of your review


message 12: by Richard (new)

Richard Zhuang Man, I feel you. I put down nearly the exact same thing (phrased a little differently) as my review, but yours was actually another level. 1000% agree.


message 13: by Angela (new)

Angela Sandoz Ugh! I am halfway through this book & cannot understand the good reviews. I love reading & science fiction. This book is so painful. I hope it doesn’t end up as a movie. Thanks for your review restoring my faith in humanity!


message 14: by Betts725 (new)

Betts725 After reading your review I can see your point of view, but I loved this book! I actually read it, I think listening might have bored me to tears because of the technical science stuff that some I actually skimmed through or skipped. I haven’t read The Martian so I didn’t have that to compare.


message 15: by Gabriela (new)

Gabriela I’m glad I read the book, even though I hated it, simply because it brought me to this gem of a review. This review right here is better than the entire book.


message 16: by Keegan (new)

Keegan Thank you so much for writing out this review. It is incredibly therapeutic and makes me feel less crazy for having the same thoughts.


message 17: by André (new)

André Bernhardt Sad but true and I am happy I am finally done with it. I also could not believe the ratings here overall so far but it looks like it is simply a book that does not resemble with me but with a lot of other people on a level I cannot grasp.


message 18: by Bobbie (new)

Bobbie Your review is spot on! Such a waste of time to the point of painful. My first one star review. I wouldn’t have finished it, but for my “buddy read” partner, who feels the same way. Big mistake, huge….


message 19: by Grant (new)

Grant Jahn I couldn’t even get through 200 pages of this. I felt my brain disintegrating. What a waste of time and hype.


message 20: by Mary (new)

Mary Your review is spot on, I wrote one with more than a few similar points. Thank goodness I'm not the only one who thought this book was terrible. The writing is what I can only describe as "cringe-y" at its best points and embarrassing at its worst!


Julie In Wonderland Myles wrote: "It’s actually shocking how insufferable this book is"
Yess couldn’t believe such a poorly written book is so hyped up


Julie In Wonderland Keegan wrote: "Thank you so much for writing out this review. It is incredibly therapeutic and makes me feel less crazy for having the same thoughts."

Glad to be of service. xD It’s also good for me to know I’m not the only one who’s not a fan.


Julie In Wonderland Mary wrote: "Your review is spot on, I wrote one with more than a few similar points. Thank goodness I'm not the only one who thought this book was terrible. The writing is what I can only describe as "cringe-y..."
I read your review. I wanted to comment on it but I couldn’t because we’re not goodreads friends. It’s validating to know you also had problem with the suspension of belief in this book. And I never noticed before but you’re right about the protagonist resembling a man written by a clueless woman. He does sound like a clumsy, blushing female lead of a romance novel, doesn’t he? Now I keep imagining him as the heroine and Rocky as the hero of some space romance fantasy and I can’t stop laughing. xD


Julie In Wonderland Grant wrote: "I couldn’t even get through 200 pages of this. I felt my brain disintegrating. What a waste of time and hype."

You have to hate yourself enough to put yourself through reading it to the end. Lol. Still don’t understand how so many people love this book.


message 25: by Andreas (new)

Andreas Schwartmann This book feels like the author likes masturbating to a physics book.


message 26: by Ivan (last edited Mar 12, 2022 01:23AM) (new)

Ivan Plantevin I haven't settled on the amount of stars yet, but I agree with most of your points. If I hadn't been gifted the book, or hadn't had the slight desire to know how it would end, I may have DNFed it 😅 It's such a different writing style from the SFF I'm used to, with fleshed-out and morally ambiguous characters, as well as thematically rich plots. Oh and show, don't tell, please!
Weir probably just isn't for me.

Edit: rounding up to 3 stars.


message 27: by Dina (new)

Dina idk who the hell are you, but your are so fucking wrong. IT'S SO AMAZING, YOU CAN'T SAY ALL THE THINGS YOU SAID


Julie In Wonderland Andreas wrote: "This book feels like the author likes masturbating to a physics book."
Yes your comment sums up everything I’m trying to say in this review. 😂


Julie In Wonderland Ivan wrote: "I haven't settled on the amount of stars yet, but I agree with most of your points. If I hadn't been gifted the book, or hadn't had the slight desire to know how it would end, I may have DNFed it 😅..."
Exactly. You’re generous for the 3 stars. To me, this is the total opposite of good SFF. Mark Watney is the only character prototype Weir has and I’m tired of reading about him.


Julie In Wonderland André wrote: "Sad but true and I am happy I am finally done with it. I also could not believe the ratings here overall so far but it looks like it is simply a book that does not resemble with me but with a lot o..."

Neither can I. I am beyond trying to understand the love for this book. The Martian? I get it. It was somewhat new and original. This one is a cheap caricature of the Martian and people still love it.


Julie In Wonderland Sarah wrote: "Thank you for restoring my faith in Goodreads’ reviews. This book and the adoration shown for it are completely outside of my comprehension."

Still don't get it. None of it makes sense to me. The characters, plot, people's love for this book.


message 32: by Graham (new)

Graham  Piscopo Usually people this pretentious get paid to write their reviews but your just miserable for free


message 33: by LKay (new)

LKay Thanks for this review, Julie! I’m at 30% of the way through this book and finding it painful to get through, I’m glad I’m not alone in my thoughts!


message 34: by Ceecee (new)

Ceecee enjoyed your take on it. the writing really wasn't good but i liked the plot enough, it was accesible sci-fi, and i loved the cheesy ending. it's not gonna win a pulitzer prize or a hugo award, but it has appeal to the masses. it would be better if weir just pitched a screenplay because this would sell in the movies.


message 35: by Paper (new)

Paper Boy Thanks for saving my time, I definitely won't be reading this one. I had doubts because of such high praise (the usual), but I tried reading Artemis a few years ago, which was, as you correctly described, a total non-book. I call this overly popular badly written science fiction noob-fi. There are bad SF writers, but man, I think the way he writes is just below bad.


message 36: by Kelsey (new)

Kelsey Einhaus YAS POP OFF I can’t agree more with all of this. How this is so highly rated is absolutely beyond my comprehension


message 37: by Kirsten (new)

Kirsten Reeder I love this review so much! You said it was better than I could have. So. Much. Info. Dumping. And boring stuff. And no characterization. All the things.


message 38: by Jay (new)

Jay Robinson Spot on.


message 39: by James (last edited Jun 19, 2022 01:16PM) (new)

James You have restored my faith in humanity. At least one small part of humanity. I feel like Diogenes finding an honest person, or in this case, one with good taste.

I will only add one thing to your delightful review. As a scientist, I can say he is as bad with the science as he is with his preposterous characters.


message 40: by Bruno (new)

Bruno I'm done at page 123, absolute dogshit hyped book.


message 41: by Brian (new)

Brian Delaney What a great review!!
I wish I’d read it before wasting time trying to get into this heap of shite.


message 42: by Tatiana (new)

Tatiana Preach.


message 43: by Keith (new)

Keith Stevenson Thank you for reading this book to the end so I don't have to.


message 44: by DG (new)

DG I’m about 3/4 of the way through the book and about to bail. I keep hoping it improves, but it never does. I completely agree with you review. I just don’t get how everyone seems to love this book and give it 5 stars. No depth or character development, it’s just flat out boring.


message 45: by Christina (new)

Christina Courcoulos i’m half way through the book and while i completely agree with the part about the alien, i do enjoy the way the book is written. I’m into chemistry and biology and despite all the info dumbing, i like the fact that i’m able to understand the calculations, tools, and elements mentioned throughout the story.


message 46: by Sean (new)

Sean Rassleagh It's a hard science fiction thriller. If you're not interested in the science you aren't going to like it, but that doesn't mean it is a bad book it means it isn't your genre.


ky 🌿🍄 okay thank you, because I'm like did we read the same book? The concept was awesome but I cannot stand his writing style. Cool if you enjoy it, no shade. But I found myself cringing too much to finish this one.


message 48: by Mark (new)

Mark Davies I agree with lots of your comments. How this has over 4.5 on Goodreads I've no idea.


message 49: by Sam (new)

Sam Prince I also struggled with this book and with the proportion of 4/5 ratings. There were elements I liked but the annoyances were very persistent and ran right through it.

Having the ultrateacher go from being not particularly musical to magically acquiring perfect pitch for mentally decoding alien words made of pairs of 5 note chords was especially painful. And yet it served the telling of the story so conveniently, yay!

His knowledge of science and technology was jarringly encyclopaedic too. For a microbiologist he sure had a solid handle on the maths required for plotting a course for his interstellar craft. Also as a self-confessed novice coder he cooked up some wacky sound processing software in an afternoon.

Equally clunky was the frequent excuse-making directed at the reader. "Oh, I know this because it's on the wall in my classroom and I absorbed it by ultrateacher osmosis". Considering he is teaching to kids in 8th grade in the US it is a bit of a stretch to understand where he picked up the relevant skills and knowledge. Unlikely that it was on his microbiology degree 20 years or so earlier.

In terms of plot holes it also seems surprising that the people of earth didn't put any significant effort into solving the problem at the venus end. Nope, much better to go for as-yet-untried near-speed-of-light travel to a distant star with a best case scenario of multiple decade turnaround times and billions dead. Then they sat on thir hands for 20 years and just hoped. While we're at it, we have loads of capacity and power on the ship, but let's only put 3 people on it. Never mind that it would only have taken a few months to make enough fuel to send a couple more. Nah, stick 5kg of vodka on there and let it rip. We've put a hasty Dutch lady in charge and we're doing what she says!


message 50: by Mafalda (new)

Mafalda I just finished this book and I have to say I really enjoyed it. But I totally agree with you on many of the points you’ve made.

I loved the Martian, hated Artemis. My theory was that Andy Weir does not understand how humans interact with one another and all the interactions between characters end up being cringey. This theory still stands after reading Hail Mary. Human interactions are atrocious and I’m so glad he acknowledges this by killing all the other members of the crew. It’s awfully convenient for him, but I think it really worked well.

As for Ryland Grace being Mark Watney v.2. I don’t think it’s that really… both characters are actually Andy Weir himself. Have you read his posts or the acknowledgments on the books? Same personality. And you know what, it works. Bring on some more Andy Weir-like characters stranded in space and I will read about them. Just as long as he doesn’t decide to go back to writing female characters. Jazz Bashara was horrendous.


« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 20 21
back to top