Rachael’s review of In the Blind > Likes and Comments
98 likes · Like
Great review, Rachael :)
Great review Racheal! Was this queer baiting or what? lol!
Persephone's Pomegranate wrote: "Great review, Rachael :)"
Thank you!
Dik wrote: "Great review Racheal! Was this queer baiting or what? lol!"
100%! I had to go back and double check to make sure that’s the section I got it from, because I thought surely I read that wrong 😂 I should have read the description better. I just assumed a girl main character and in the lqbtqia+ section and thought I was going to get a sapphic murder mystery 😂 we get like a few sentences about a side character that might not be straight
Great review, Rachel. I am also totally confused when I see LGBTQIA+ next to a book. I expect so much and then sometimes it just comes down to the ticket inspector on the train being trans. Sometimes I think might sometimes be warning people who are transphobic.
@paul I never thought of this!!!! That’s actually pretty messed up if someone feels like they have to worn people about lgqbtia+ people just existing. If I see that tag I expect it to be like a main character, so it definitely threw me off.
Thanks so much for the review Rachael! I totally understand how you felt bamboozled -- my novel definitely didn't earn the LGBTQIA category, and I think it was a publisher error that's been corrected. Apologies again! I so appreciate your reading In the Blind--it means the world to have readers like you take the time to do so and to put such thought into your review . Thank you!!!
Lydia wrote: "Thanks so much for the review Rachael! I totally understand how you felt bamboozled -- my novel definitely didn't earn the LGBTQIA category, and I think it was a publisher error that's been correct..."
Thanks for stopping by to clarify! That totally makes sense. I still had a fun time here!
Lydia wrote: "Thanks so much for the review Rachael! I totally understand how you felt bamboozled -- my novel definitely didn't earn the LGBTQIA category, and I think it was a publisher error that's been correct..." So good to see you caring about these things. I promise to read this book when it reaches the shelves. Thanks
this is also exactly how I ended up here, hahaha. enjoying it though!
For sure I do, Paul. Sorry again! And so appreciate you all letting me know about the mix-up!
back to top
date
newest »
newest »
message 1:
by
Persephone's Pomegranate
(last edited Oct 23, 2026 12:20AM)
(new)
Oct 23, 2026 12:20AM
Great review, Rachael :)
reply
|
flag
Great review Racheal! Was this queer baiting or what? lol!
Persephone's Pomegranate wrote: "Great review, Rachael :)"Thank you!
Dik wrote: "Great review Racheal! Was this queer baiting or what? lol!"100%! I had to go back and double check to make sure that’s the section I got it from, because I thought surely I read that wrong 😂 I should have read the description better. I just assumed a girl main character and in the lqbtqia+ section and thought I was going to get a sapphic murder mystery 😂 we get like a few sentences about a side character that might not be straight
Great review, Rachel. I am also totally confused when I see LGBTQIA+ next to a book. I expect so much and then sometimes it just comes down to the ticket inspector on the train being trans. Sometimes I think might sometimes be warning people who are transphobic.
@paul I never thought of this!!!! That’s actually pretty messed up if someone feels like they have to worn people about lgqbtia+ people just existing. If I see that tag I expect it to be like a main character, so it definitely threw me off.
Thanks so much for the review Rachael! I totally understand how you felt bamboozled -- my novel definitely didn't earn the LGBTQIA category, and I think it was a publisher error that's been corrected. Apologies again! I so appreciate your reading In the Blind--it means the world to have readers like you take the time to do so and to put such thought into your review . Thank you!!!
Lydia wrote: "Thanks so much for the review Rachael! I totally understand how you felt bamboozled -- my novel definitely didn't earn the LGBTQIA category, and I think it was a publisher error that's been correct..."Thanks for stopping by to clarify! That totally makes sense. I still had a fun time here!
Lydia wrote: "Thanks so much for the review Rachael! I totally understand how you felt bamboozled -- my novel definitely didn't earn the LGBTQIA category, and I think it was a publisher error that's been correct..." So good to see you caring about these things. I promise to read this book when it reaches the shelves. Thanks
this is also exactly how I ended up here, hahaha. enjoying it though!
For sure I do, Paul. Sorry again! And so appreciate you all letting me know about the mix-up!