Referring first to the WKC entry "Mystery of King Gilling's Murder," subsection "Suspects," item "Garvaon seems to confess (II, chap. 26, 324)." But details given in "Garvaon" entry are explicit in Able saying that Garvaon made both strikes on the king. (The entry goes into the difficulties of Garvaon striking the king, including possible time-travel.) So I am not sure which entry to append with a new observation about Able's promise to Garvaon. (Probably the "Garvaon" entry.) Is the point of this new info that Able lied in his writing to prevent Idnn from learning? Or that Able lied to the reader for the literary artifice of a later dramatic reveal? Or something else entirely?
But details given in "Garvaon" entry are explicit in Able saying that Garvaon made both strikes on the king. (The entry goes into the difficulties of Garvaon striking the king, including possible time-travel.) So I am not sure which entry to append with a new observation about Able's promise to Garvaon. (Probably the "Garvaon" entry.) Is the point of this new info that Able lied in his writing to prevent Idnn from learning? Or that Able lied to the reader for the literary artifice of a later dramatic reveal? Or something else entirely?