Carlie’s Comments (group member since Dec 15, 2008)

Carlie’s comments from the The protesters group.

My comment is in response to the directions of this group which states we should explain why the other side is wrong. I can't bother explaining cause if you are actually for testing makeup on animals, there is something so fundamentally wrong with you, that there would be no point.

Against. Isn't it obvious how stupid testing makeup on animals is?

If it isn't to you, I'm not gonna bother cause it's not worth it.

Against.
We should respect all living things. A human's life is not worth more than an animal's life. If you believe that, that is specism.
Besides, can you prove that humans are more important than animals? If we dissappeared, the earth would go on. If bees dissappeared, most of the world (except bacteria, etc.) would dissappear.
We are akin to parasites.

Against.
Whenever humans start messing with the natural world, bad things happen.
As for the we can feed the hungry B.S., we already produce enough food to feed the world. Genetic modification is not about feeding the hungry, it's about more money for the agricultural industry that uses them. So, don't buy that argument please.

And also for feeding the hungry, if you feed everyone so noone dies of hunger, you would just be exacerbating our overpopulation problem. Besides, they're gonna die of something. What is this obsession with preventing death?