Shaun’s
Comments
(group member since Dec 05, 2014)
Shaun’s
comments
from the Bibliophiles of Loathing group.
Showing 1-20 of 58




So one of the central things to the story is predicting the future. This may sound odd, but I had trouble suspending my disbelief for it. The scifi book Dune also had a character that could depict a future and for some reason I was fine with it. Whats the difference? Well Foundation tries to explain it with math and science. Apparently you can depict mass groups of people near perfectly for thousands of years. I just can't bring myself to buy it. There are way too many variables. Unknowns. It discounts the power of the individual. The randomness of existence. Dune on other hand has a character drink a secretion from an alien worm and it gives him visions of the future (or many possible futures based on actions taken) and I'm fine with it. Does it make anymore sense? No, not really. I guess because they don't try to explain it so much as a science I don't scrutinize it.
This, however, is not the only thing that made me think of Dune. Religion is used as a power in this book. the plans for the future making science into a religious power, which was an interesting premise. Dune, on the other hand had the man who can view the future turned into a religious figure head. Both were an attempt to prevent disastrous outcomes for humanity.
Anyway it worked well being several short stories. We got to see each era and how they worked for the time they were in. From the initial plans, to the encyclopedist, to the mayoral founding of a scientific religion. and the rise of the traders. Each story may not work 100% well on it's own, but as a piece of the history of this universe it all goes together nicely. I actually read the rest of the trilogy this month (it was expanded beyond a trilogy but originally there were 3) and I enjoyed those too, so if you liked this book you might want to continue.

Anyway, having whimsical children's characters in gritty adult stories worked surprisingly well.




Anyway, I think it did a good job of presenting both the good and bad of Andre's life and letting you judge for yourself. They didn't do too much rationalizing of his behavior, or leaving out the bad parts. The only attempts to do this were at the beginning where Hulk Hogan explains a bit about Andre's life, and constant pain, which was probably true. And while I mostly appreciate them not taking a stand on trying to explain what he does, in the same vain then it came off a little detached as a narrative. This as exacerbated for me but it skipping around in little fragmented pieces of his life. Though it gives a good overview, it is a little stilted. It's hard to get a flow of things going.
Things I didn't know about Andre: 1) His racist joking within earshot of Bad News Brown. Who can say why he did this. Was it legitimate ignorance, drunk talk, or was he genuinely racist? All I know is, that despite his tendency to get into trouble when drunk (which he was frequently) those who got close to him think he was the nicest guy. The fact that he later apologized makes me hope he was just ignorant. 2) That he had a daughter. I flat out didn't know this, though obviously it wasn't well known as he was not a part of her life at all. Again, all it really states is the fact that this is so, it doesn't make too many judgements.
The one thing I personally would consider changing, had to do with the framing. you started with Hogan talking about Andre, but that is the only time this happens. It would have been interesting if each of the stories had been framed with personality sharing the story. Of course this might have been hard to swing and include stuff like his illegitimate daughter. Who would tell that tale?
Anyway, this book seemed to get the facts right. Or at very least, the stories right. As it itself admits, it's hard to separate fact from fiction with a man like Andre. But it doesn't contain anything that is out and out wrong, and covers important aspects of him as a person.
I enjoyed it, though I worry that someone with no interest in wrestling would be swayed by this book, which is unfortunate as Andre is a genuinely interesting person.

Mar 03, 2016 12:17PM



Firstly, my hardest part with this book was dealing with the setting. I don't know if it's considered steam punk or not (I know very little about steam punk) but it sort of gave me that vibe (even though their was diesel gas, electricity, and other stuff that I am not sure if are present in steampunk usually or not.) But I just had problems turning off the disbelief in my brain. I read stories about wizards and aliens and dwarfs and dragons but for some reason a story about a sea of rails and train chasing giant moles through a hellish landscape of underground dwelling monstrosities my brain just kept going "ehh... I dunno about that" I mean, yes, of course, it's impossible, but so are many other things I read about so I don't now why it was so hard to suspend my disbelief.
Still, I did appreciate a unique setting. I mean, though it would be more plausible the same story on an actual sea would be boring. It would be.... Moby Dick... Ok maybe not as dry as Moby Dick but certainly Moby Dick inspired.
Mostly I appreciated the writing style. The narrative was fun. It was clever, but not so high brow and take itself too seriously, nor going the opposite and being self deprecating.
I am a sucker for a coming of age story. And as someone who still has no idea wtf he wants out of life I can identify with Sham's journey even though I am 30 and this is probably aimed at teens.
One minor thing that bugged me was the character name of the deity That Apt Ohm. It felt like it should be a reference to something I just couldn't get. So I googled it, and it is an anagram of Toppam Hat. The fat controller from Thomas the Tank engine. Kind of funny, but the name That Apt Ohm, well, kind of sucks. Captain Naphi is a better anagram, as her full name apparently is an anagram of Captain Ahab. I am still not sure if anagrams are really the best way to sneak references into a book.
Anyway, overall it was a fun narrative. The setting wasn't my total cup of tea but I was able to accept it in its service to the narrative. I appreciated something that was so obviously influenced by something (moby dick) but still be able to be unique and fun. Mostly I think that even though I was totally sold on the steampunkiness (or whatever) the fact that it was well written helped me appreciate it a lot.


Read endless useless fake annotations because eventually one might be worthwhile.
Have to tip the book upside down, sideways, or diagonal.
Scroll through endless stream of consciousness bs about getting high and banging strange women in a psuedo poetic rant.
Have to discern text that is both crossed out and red because it's purposeful redactedness is probably important.
Be required to read a paragraph bottom to top from left to right.
Have to read the first letter of each word to figure out what the actual message is.
None of that makes for a good reading experience. I get it, the house is disorienting so you make the text disorienting. Here is the problem, having the text all goofy doesn't make me feel claustrophobic, afraid, or anxious, it just makes me frustrated and annoyed.
This is all too bad, because there is some stuff I liked. The account of the Navidson Record can be rather interesting. I cared a little bit less about Johnny's descent into madness than I did the Navidsons', until he was actually fully crazed and then I liked it. I don't know what it says about me. Also his mother's letters at the end were heartbreaking.
So, while there is a bit of this I really enjoyed, there was just too much for my feeble brain to slog through.


