“which questions what is present only with regard to its presence.
In any case, one thing becomes clear: To raise the question of
aletheia, of unconcealment as such, is not the same as raising the
question of truth. For this reason, it was inadequate and misleading
to caU aletheia in the sense of opening, truth.5 The talk about the
"truth of Being" has a justified meaning in Hegel's Science of Logic,
because here truth means the certainty of absolute knowledge. But
Hegel also, as little as Husserl, as little as all metaphysics, does not
ask about Being as Being, that is, does not raise the question how
there can be presence as such. There is presence only when opening
is dominant. Opening is named with aletheia, unconcealment, but not thought as such.”