23 books
—
1 voter
Informatics Books
Showing 1-50 of 743

by (shelved 6 times as informatics)
avg rating 4.36 — 23,168 ratings — published 2007

by (shelved 6 times as informatics)
avg rating 4.04 — 16,960 ratings — published 2011

by (shelved 6 times as informatics)
avg rating 4.47 — 4,836 ratings — published 1984

by (shelved 5 times as informatics)
avg rating 4.40 — 10,415 ratings — published 1999

by (shelved 5 times as informatics)
avg rating 4.33 — 23,715 ratings — published 1999

by (shelved 4 times as informatics)
avg rating 4.13 — 34,435 ratings — published 2016

by (shelved 4 times as informatics)
avg rating 4.01 — 14,934 ratings — published 1975

by (shelved 4 times as informatics)
avg rating 4.20 — 11,869 ratings — published 1994

by (shelved 4 times as informatics)
avg rating 4.15 — 2,218 ratings — published 1998

by (shelved 4 times as informatics)
avg rating 4.35 — 9,265 ratings — published 1989

by (shelved 4 times as informatics)
avg rating 4.44 — 11,231 ratings — published 1978

by (shelved 3 times as informatics)
avg rating 4.24 — 8,790 ratings — published 1999

by (shelved 3 times as informatics)
avg rating 3.74 — 6,410 ratings — published 2015

by (shelved 3 times as informatics)
avg rating 3.86 — 69 ratings — published 2006

by (shelved 3 times as informatics)
avg rating 3.85 — 20,654 ratings — published 2014

by (shelved 3 times as informatics)
avg rating 4.39 — 8,616 ratings — published 1983

by (shelved 3 times as informatics)
avg rating 4.34 — 2,675 ratings — published 1997

by (shelved 3 times as informatics)
avg rating 4.23 — 1,222 ratings — published 2007

by (shelved 3 times as informatics)
avg rating 4.30 — 9,451 ratings — published 1993

by (shelved 3 times as informatics)
avg rating 4.51 — 8,039 ratings — published 2001

by (shelved 3 times as informatics)
avg rating 4.42 — 1,813 ratings — published 1983

by (shelved 3 times as informatics)
avg rating 4.29 — 640 ratings — published 2000

by (shelved 2 times as informatics)
avg rating 3.75 — 773 ratings — published 1999

by (shelved 2 times as informatics)
avg rating 4.59 — 2,310 ratings — published 2013

by (shelved 2 times as informatics)
avg rating 4.46 — 1,119 ratings — published 2002

by (shelved 2 times as informatics)
avg rating 4.14 — 669 ratings — published 1996

by (shelved 2 times as informatics)
avg rating 4.15 — 5,760 ratings — published 2003

by (shelved 2 times as informatics)
avg rating 3.84 — 5,331 ratings — published 2021

by (shelved 2 times as informatics)
avg rating 4.11 — 11,607 ratings — published 2018

by (shelved 2 times as informatics)
avg rating 4.15 — 33 ratings — published 2014

by (shelved 2 times as informatics)
avg rating 4.33 — 6,892 ratings — published 2008

by (shelved 2 times as informatics)
avg rating 4.26 — 2,842 ratings — published 2019

by (shelved 2 times as informatics)
avg rating 4.48 — 2,898 ratings — published 2005

by (shelved 2 times as informatics)
avg rating 4.07 — 2,222 ratings — published 2000

by (shelved 2 times as informatics)
avg rating 3.97 — 1,692 ratings — published 1993

by (shelved 2 times as informatics)
avg rating 3.41 — 39 ratings — published 2011

by (shelved 2 times as informatics)
avg rating 3.63 — 41 ratings — published 2007

by (shelved 2 times as informatics)
avg rating 4.30 — 57,122 ratings — published 2019

by (shelved 2 times as informatics)
avg rating 3.87 — 29,597 ratings — published 2016

by (shelved 2 times as informatics)
avg rating 3.90 — 2,188 ratings — published 1985

by (shelved 2 times as informatics)
avg rating 4.07 — 895 ratings — published 1999

by (shelved 2 times as informatics)
avg rating 4.00 — 27,127 ratings — published 2017

by (shelved 2 times as informatics)
avg rating 4.11 — 63 ratings — published 1986

by (shelved 2 times as informatics)
avg rating 4.23 — 989 ratings — published 1989

by (shelved 2 times as informatics)
avg rating 4.21 — 2,132 ratings — published 1993

by (shelved 2 times as informatics)
avg rating 4.14 — 9,883 ratings — published 1987

by (shelved 2 times as informatics)
avg rating 4.09 — 535 ratings — published 2013

by (shelved 2 times as informatics)
avg rating 4.23 — 8,660 ratings — published 2008

by (shelved 2 times as informatics)
avg rating 3.84 — 388 ratings — published 2007

by (shelved 2 times as informatics)
avg rating 4.17 — 1,378 ratings — published 2005
“Leibniz wanted to combine physics, mathematics, logic, and philosophy, and he would no doubt have loved this joke:
An engineer, a mathematician, a logician, and a philosopher were traveling through Scotland when they saw a black sheep through the window of the train.
"Aha", says the engineer, "I see that Scottish sheep are black."
"Hmm", says the mathematician, "You mean that some Scottish sheep are black."
"No", says the logician, "All we know is that there is at least one black sheep in Scotland."
"And even", the philosopher continued, "The only thing we can be really sure of is that the side facing us is black.”
― Homo Informatix
An engineer, a mathematician, a logician, and a philosopher were traveling through Scotland when they saw a black sheep through the window of the train.
"Aha", says the engineer, "I see that Scottish sheep are black."
"Hmm", says the mathematician, "You mean that some Scottish sheep are black."
"No", says the logician, "All we know is that there is at least one black sheep in Scotland."
"And even", the philosopher continued, "The only thing we can be really sure of is that the side facing us is black.”
― Homo Informatix

“Freud described three great historical wounds to the primary narcissism of the self-centered human subject, who tries to hold panic at bay by the fantasy of human exceptionalism.
First is the Copernican wound that removed Earth itself, man’s home world, from the center of the cosmos and indeed paved the way for that cosmos to burst open into a universe of inhumane, nonteleological times and spaces. Science made that decentering cut.
The second wound is the Darwinian, which put Homo sapiens firmly in the world of other critters, all trying to make an earthly living and so evolving in relation to one another without the sureties of directional signposts that culminate in Man. Science inflicted that cruel cut too.
The third wound is the Freudian, which posited an unconscious that undid the primacy of conscious processes, including the reason that comforted Man with his unique excellence, with dire consequences for teleology once again. Science seems to hold that blade too.
I want to add a fourth wound, the informatic or cyborgian, which infolds organic and technological flesh and so melds that Great Divide as well.”
― When Species Meet
First is the Copernican wound that removed Earth itself, man’s home world, from the center of the cosmos and indeed paved the way for that cosmos to burst open into a universe of inhumane, nonteleological times and spaces. Science made that decentering cut.
The second wound is the Darwinian, which put Homo sapiens firmly in the world of other critters, all trying to make an earthly living and so evolving in relation to one another without the sureties of directional signposts that culminate in Man. Science inflicted that cruel cut too.
The third wound is the Freudian, which posited an unconscious that undid the primacy of conscious processes, including the reason that comforted Man with his unique excellence, with dire consequences for teleology once again. Science seems to hold that blade too.
I want to add a fourth wound, the informatic or cyborgian, which infolds organic and technological flesh and so melds that Great Divide as well.”
― When Species Meet