61 books
—
7 voters
Information Science Books
Showing 1-50 of 1,267

by (shelved 35 times as information-science)
avg rating 4.04 — 16,959 ratings — published 2011

by (shelved 16 times as information-science)
avg rating 3.74 — 2,476 ratings — published 2007

by (shelved 12 times as information-science)
avg rating 3.10 — 1,045 ratings — published 1997

by (shelved 11 times as information-science)
avg rating 3.42 — 4,831 ratings — published 2010

by (shelved 10 times as information-science)
avg rating 3.34 — 1,147 ratings — published 1998

by (shelved 9 times as information-science)
avg rating 4.39 — 8,616 ratings — published 1983

by (shelved 9 times as information-science)
avg rating 3.97 — 424 ratings — published 1999

by (shelved 8 times as information-science)
avg rating 3.84 — 1,066 ratings — published 2000

by (shelved 7 times as information-science)
avg rating 3.87 — 29,597 ratings — published 2016

by (shelved 7 times as information-science)
avg rating 3.63 — 163 ratings — published 2012

by (shelved 7 times as information-science)
avg rating 3.80 — 2,050 ratings — published 2012

by (shelved 7 times as information-science)
avg rating 3.72 — 1,359 ratings — published 2005

by (shelved 6 times as information-science)
avg rating 3.93 — 3,829 ratings — published 1998

by (shelved 6 times as information-science)
avg rating 3.75 — 436 ratings — published 2007

by (shelved 5 times as information-science)
avg rating 3.79 — 5,477 ratings — published 2011

by (shelved 5 times as information-science)
avg rating 3.47 — 834 ratings — published 2006

by (shelved 5 times as information-science)
avg rating 4.30 — 28,683 ratings — published 1999

by (shelved 4 times as information-science)
avg rating 3.67 — 2,337 ratings — published 2021

by (shelved 4 times as information-science)
avg rating 3.28 — 141 ratings — published

by (shelved 4 times as information-science)
avg rating 3.88 — 122,214 ratings — published 2018

by (shelved 4 times as information-science)
avg rating 3.85 — 20,647 ratings — published 2014

by (shelved 4 times as information-science)
avg rating 3.79 — 204 ratings — published 2014

by (shelved 4 times as information-science)
avg rating 4.12 — 39,426 ratings — published 2011

by (shelved 4 times as information-science)
avg rating 3.19 — 356 ratings — published 1981

by (shelved 4 times as information-science)
avg rating 3.71 — 792 ratings — published 2001

by (shelved 4 times as information-science)
avg rating 3.97 — 52,103 ratings — published 2012

by (shelved 4 times as information-science)
avg rating 4.09 — 921 ratings — published 2006

by (shelved 4 times as information-science)
avg rating 3.88 — 7,956 ratings — published 2010

by (shelved 4 times as information-science)
avg rating 3.28 — 406 ratings — published 2000

by (shelved 4 times as information-science)
avg rating 3.24 — 83 ratings — published 1992

by (shelved 4 times as information-science)
avg rating 3.89 — 32,577 ratings — published 2010

by (shelved 4 times as information-science)
avg rating 3.58 — 74 ratings — published 2008

by (shelved 4 times as information-science)
avg rating 3.52 — 234 ratings — published 2008

by (shelved 4 times as information-science)
avg rating 3.18 — 137 ratings — published 2000

by (shelved 3 times as information-science)
avg rating 3.89 — 3,826 ratings — published 2018

by (shelved 3 times as information-science)
avg rating 4.36 — 199,099 ratings — published 2018

by (shelved 3 times as information-science)
avg rating 4.52 — 486 ratings — published 2002

by (shelved 3 times as information-science)
avg rating 4.00 — 3,854 ratings — published 2015

by (shelved 3 times as information-science)
avg rating 3.84 — 121,095 ratings — published 1998

by (shelved 3 times as information-science)
avg rating 3.42 — 448 ratings — published 2010

by (shelved 3 times as information-science)
avg rating 3.77 — 395 ratings — published 2015

by (shelved 3 times as information-science)
avg rating 4.11 — 3,459 ratings — published 2009

by (shelved 3 times as information-science)
avg rating 3.80 — 379 ratings — published 2014

by (shelved 3 times as information-science)
avg rating 3.35 — 942 ratings — published 2009

by (shelved 3 times as information-science)
avg rating 3.96 — 120,274 ratings — published 2007

by (shelved 3 times as information-science)
avg rating 3.93 — 12,405 ratings — published 2005

by (shelved 3 times as information-science)
avg rating 3.83 — 41 ratings — published 1998

by (shelved 3 times as information-science)
avg rating 3.77 — 3,638 ratings — published 2013

by (shelved 3 times as information-science)
avg rating 3.94 — 4,671 ratings — published 2011

by (shelved 3 times as information-science)
avg rating 3.90 — 797 ratings — published 1961

“...artificial intelligence will become a major human rights issue in the twenty-first century.”
― Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism
― Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism

“If insolvency is not transparent or well understood, and if illiquidity is backstopped by the Federal Reserve, then why do bank runs commence? The answer is psychology. Some customers or counterparties come to believe a bank will not repay them so they pull their money out or close transactions as quickly as possible. They are not reassured by ... press releases or positive comments by management. Word spreads, the withdrawals accelerate, and within days, sometimes hours, the bank closes its doors. From there it's an open issue whether the lost confidence spreads to other banks, in a process called contagion. No amount of capital or comment can stop a bank panic; it has a life of its own.
...
Enter AI. The next bank run may be triggered not by human panic but by AI imitating human panic. An AI bank analysis program with deeply layered neural networks and machine learning capability (perhaps complimented by a GPT capacity to speak with human analysts) Could read millions of pages of financial data on thousands of individual banks, far more than any team of human analysts could review. It's training set of materials provides familiarity with the dynamics of bank runs, basically an emerging property of a complex dynamic system, along with historical examples, worst case scenarios, and defensive moves. Events like the gold corner of 1869, the panic of 1907, the Great Depression of the 1930s, and the S&L crisis of the 1980s would all seem as fresh as today's news. This system would reach the same conclusion as a human analyst — move first, get your money out fast, don't be the last in line.
The true danger is not that the machine thinks like a human — it's supposed to. The danger is that it can act faster and communicate with other machines.”
― MoneyGPT: AI and the Threat to the Global Economy
...
Enter AI. The next bank run may be triggered not by human panic but by AI imitating human panic. An AI bank analysis program with deeply layered neural networks and machine learning capability (perhaps complimented by a GPT capacity to speak with human analysts) Could read millions of pages of financial data on thousands of individual banks, far more than any team of human analysts could review. It's training set of materials provides familiarity with the dynamics of bank runs, basically an emerging property of a complex dynamic system, along with historical examples, worst case scenarios, and defensive moves. Events like the gold corner of 1869, the panic of 1907, the Great Depression of the 1930s, and the S&L crisis of the 1980s would all seem as fresh as today's news. This system would reach the same conclusion as a human analyst — move first, get your money out fast, don't be the last in line.
The true danger is not that the machine thinks like a human — it's supposed to. The danger is that it can act faster and communicate with other machines.”
― MoneyGPT: AI and the Threat to the Global Economy