113 books
—
11 voters
Pop Science Books
Showing 1-50 of 4,777

by (shelved 110 times as pop-science)
avg rating 4.21 — 471,795 ratings — published 1988

by (shelved 98 times as pop-science)
avg rating 4.34 — 1,224,682 ratings — published 2011

by (shelved 92 times as pop-science)
avg rating 4.22 — 416,379 ratings — published 2003

by (shelved 84 times as pop-science)
avg rating 4.16 — 190,455 ratings — published 1976

by (shelved 80 times as pop-science)
avg rating 4.01 — 890,303 ratings — published 2005

by (shelved 76 times as pop-science)
avg rating 4.19 — 853,572 ratings — published 2008

by (shelved 69 times as pop-science)
avg rating 4.01 — 848,310 ratings — published 2000

by (shelved 67 times as pop-science)
avg rating 3.96 — 617,633 ratings — published 2005

by (shelved 66 times as pop-science)
avg rating 4.14 — 193,092 ratings — published 2014

by (shelved 60 times as pop-science)
avg rating 4.17 — 573,860 ratings — published 2011

by (shelved 54 times as pop-science)
avg rating 4.40 — 156,941 ratings — published 1980

by (shelved 51 times as pop-science)
avg rating 4.08 — 202,555 ratings — published 2017

by (shelved 48 times as pop-science)
avg rating 4.37 — 219,861 ratings — published 2017

by (shelved 48 times as pop-science)
avg rating 4.06 — 236,601 ratings — published 2003

by (shelved 46 times as pop-science)
avg rating 4.05 — 242,419 ratings — published 1985

by (shelved 45 times as pop-science)
avg rating 4.13 — 793,910 ratings — published 2010

by (shelved 44 times as pop-science)
avg rating 4.04 — 449,794 ratings — published 1997

by (shelved 41 times as pop-science)
avg rating 4.18 — 30,946 ratings — published 2016

by (shelved 41 times as pop-science)
avg rating 4.29 — 79,228 ratings — published 1995

by (shelved 40 times as pop-science)
avg rating 4.19 — 282,482 ratings — published 2015

by (shelved 40 times as pop-science)
avg rating 3.95 — 59,799 ratings — published 2010

by (shelved 39 times as pop-science)
avg rating 4.06 — 44,590 ratings — published 2008

by (shelved 37 times as pop-science)
avg rating 4.31 — 96,904 ratings — published 2019

by (shelved 37 times as pop-science)
avg rating 3.93 — 51,022 ratings — published 2013

by (shelved 37 times as pop-science)
avg rating 4.08 — 469,396 ratings — published 2012

by (shelved 37 times as pop-science)
avg rating 3.92 — 55,520 ratings — published 2010

by (shelved 37 times as pop-science)
avg rating 3.85 — 59,826 ratings — published 2008

by (shelved 36 times as pop-science)
avg rating 4.10 — 101,575 ratings — published 1999

by (shelved 35 times as pop-science)
avg rating 4.16 — 55,753 ratings — published 2009

by (shelved 34 times as pop-science)
avg rating 3.90 — 280,881 ratings — published 2006

by (shelved 34 times as pop-science)
avg rating 4.06 — 76,892 ratings — published 2010

by (shelved 34 times as pop-science)
avg rating 4.03 — 40,541 ratings — published 1987

by (shelved 34 times as pop-science)
avg rating 4.27 — 215,199 ratings — published 1985

by (shelved 33 times as pop-science)
avg rating 4.35 — 54,693 ratings — published 2016

by (shelved 33 times as pop-science)
avg rating 4.13 — 554,205 ratings — published 2012

by (shelved 33 times as pop-science)
avg rating 4.12 — 130,121 ratings — published 2008

by (shelved 31 times as pop-science)
avg rating 3.99 — 65,274 ratings — published 2014

by (shelved 29 times as pop-science)
avg rating 3.60 — 40,356 ratings — published 2005

by (shelved 28 times as pop-science)
avg rating 3.97 — 190,333 ratings — published 2013

by (shelved 28 times as pop-science)
avg rating 4.21 — 30,432 ratings — published 1994

by (shelved 26 times as pop-science)
avg rating 4.06 — 27,806 ratings — published 1999

by (shelved 26 times as pop-science)
avg rating 4.10 — 41,220 ratings — published 2008

by (shelved 26 times as pop-science)
avg rating 4.04 — 28,391 ratings — published 2008

by (shelved 25 times as pop-science)
avg rating 4.26 — 85,516 ratings — published 2018

by (shelved 25 times as pop-science)
avg rating 4.38 — 30,455 ratings — published 2017

by (shelved 25 times as pop-science)
avg rating 4.34 — 112,405 ratings — published 2010

by (shelved 25 times as pop-science)
avg rating 4.30 — 33,042 ratings — published 1997

by (shelved 25 times as pop-science)
avg rating 4.19 — 209,483 ratings — published 2006

by (shelved 25 times as pop-science)
avg rating 4.30 — 28,685 ratings — published 1999

by (shelved 25 times as pop-science)
avg rating 4.19 — 44,957 ratings — published 2001

“What worries me is the acceptance of the importance of feelings without any effort to understand their complex biological and sociocultural machinery. The best example of this attitude can be found in the attempt to explain bruised feelings or irrational behavior by appealing to surface social causes or the action of neurotransmitters, two explanations that pervade the social discourse as presented in the visual and printed media; and in the attempt to correct personal and social problems with medical and nonmedical drugs. It is precisely this lack of understanding of the nature of feelings and reason (one of the hallmarks of the "culture of complaint") that is cause for alarm.”
― Descartes' Error: Emotion, Reason and the Human Brain
― Descartes' Error: Emotion, Reason and the Human Brain
“Des résultats qui apparaissent pour la première fois dans des rapports ou des livres, même à gros tirage, n'ont aucune fiabilité. Tout simplement parce que ces publications n'ont pas passé le filtre du contrôle par les pairs. Les éditeurs n'ont évidemment pas la capacité d'expertise du monde académique et leur premier souci est plus de s'assurer du potentiel de vente d'un livre que de la parfaite légitimité scientifique des arguments que l'on y trouve. Par ailleurs, un livre qui se glorifie de présenter des résultats s'opposant au consensus, ou à la pensée unique ou à l'idéologie dominante, a toutes les chances d'être une imposture scientifique.”
― Le Négationnisme économique. Et comment s'en débarrasser (ESSAIS)
― Le Négationnisme économique. Et comment s'en débarrasser (ESSAIS)