26 books
—
7 voters
Software Development Books
Showing 1-50 of 4,978

by (shelved 304 times as software-development)
avg rating 4.33 — 23,716 ratings — published 1999

by (shelved 294 times as software-development)
avg rating 4.36 — 23,169 ratings — published 2007

by (shelved 194 times as software-development)
avg rating 4.24 — 8,790 ratings — published 1999

by (shelved 184 times as software-development)
avg rating 4.30 — 9,452 ratings — published 1993

by (shelved 180 times as software-development)
avg rating 4.15 — 5,761 ratings — published 2003

by (shelved 178 times as software-development)
avg rating 4.01 — 14,934 ratings — published 1975

by (shelved 172 times as software-development)
avg rating 4.20 — 11,870 ratings — published 1994

by (shelved 143 times as software-development)
avg rating 4.14 — 4,658 ratings — published 2004

by (shelved 142 times as software-development)
avg rating 4.26 — 9,202 ratings — published 2011

by (shelved 130 times as software-development)
avg rating 4.12 — 3,867 ratings — published 2002

by (shelved 117 times as software-development)
avg rating 4.30 — 8,968 ratings — published 2004

by (shelved 115 times as software-development)
avg rating 4.70 — 10,191 ratings — published 2015

by (shelved 108 times as software-development)
avg rating 4.10 — 4,384 ratings — published 2002

by (shelved 102 times as software-development)
avg rating 4.22 — 6,942 ratings — published 2017

by (shelved 95 times as software-development)
avg rating 4.26 — 49,296 ratings — published 2013

by (shelved 88 times as software-development)
avg rating 4.12 — 4,066 ratings — published 1999

by (shelved 87 times as software-development)
avg rating 4.20 — 3,292 ratings — published 2010

by (shelved 81 times as software-development)
avg rating 4.05 — 7,939 ratings — published

by (shelved 81 times as software-development)
avg rating 4.14 — 9,883 ratings — published 1987

by (shelved 80 times as software-development)
avg rating 4.22 — 5,149 ratings — published 2014

by (shelved 72 times as software-development)
avg rating 4.35 — 9,265 ratings — published 1989

by (shelved 71 times as software-development)
avg rating 4.22 — 4,263 ratings — published 2018

by (shelved 71 times as software-development)
avg rating 4.24 — 30,476 ratings — published 2000

by (shelved 69 times as software-development)
avg rating 4.19 — 2,460 ratings — published 2009

by (shelved 66 times as software-development)
avg rating 4.25 — 3,230 ratings — published 2007

by (shelved 65 times as software-development)
avg rating 3.95 — 4,348 ratings — published 2009

by (shelved 62 times as software-development)
avg rating 4.23 — 8,660 ratings — published 2008

by (shelved 60 times as software-development)
avg rating 4.51 — 8,039 ratings — published 2001

by (shelved 60 times as software-development)
avg rating 4.25 — 1,313 ratings — published 2002

by (shelved 59 times as software-development)
avg rating 4.29 — 5,800 ratings — published 2015

by (shelved 55 times as software-development)
avg rating 4.26 — 2,106 ratings — published 2020

by (shelved 54 times as software-development)
avg rating 4.47 — 4,836 ratings — published 1984

by (shelved 54 times as software-development)
avg rating 4.40 — 10,415 ratings — published 1999

by (shelved 51 times as software-development)
avg rating 4.05 — 1,437 ratings — published 2004

by (shelved 50 times as software-development)
avg rating 4.33 — 6,892 ratings — published 2008

by (shelved 49 times as software-development)
avg rating 4.42 — 5,240 ratings — published 2015

by (shelved 43 times as software-development)
avg rating 4.20 — 3,214 ratings — published 1986

by (shelved 42 times as software-development)
avg rating 4.05 — 1,283 ratings — published 2013

by (shelved 41 times as software-development)
avg rating 4.20 — 1,911 ratings — published 2020

by (shelved 41 times as software-development)
avg rating 4.12 — 1,542 ratings — published 2003

by (shelved 40 times as software-development)
avg rating 4.17 — 1,119 ratings — published

by (shelved 40 times as software-development)
avg rating 4.44 — 11,230 ratings — published 1978

by (shelved 39 times as software-development)
avg rating 3.84 — 2,840 ratings — published

by (shelved 38 times as software-development)
avg rating 3.95 — 5,349 ratings — published 2009

by (shelved 37 times as software-development)
avg rating 4.18 — 3,384 ratings — published 2009

by (shelved 34 times as software-development)
avg rating 4.14 — 2,623 ratings — published 2005

by (shelved 34 times as software-development)
avg rating 4.13 — 3,376 ratings — published 2004

by (shelved 33 times as software-development)
avg rating 4.19 — 5,358 ratings — published 2019

by (shelved 33 times as software-development)
avg rating 3.96 — 1,683 ratings — published 2010

by (shelved 31 times as software-development)
avg rating 4.18 — 1,066 ratings — published 2003
“Unlocking the Potential: The Practical Advantages of an HRMS Software”
―
―
“>>>>> Buy Old GitHub Accounts <<<<
★★ 2025 Guide: Buying Old GitHub Accounts Safely & Legally
➤➤ SMMBanks.com➤➤#SMMBanks
Looking to buy old GitHub accounts? Smmbanks offers high-quality GitHub accounts at affordable prices. Whether for personal use or business needs, our accounts are reliable and secure. Shop with confidence and enjoy fast, secure transactions. Get the best deals now!
★★★★★★★★ SmmBanks Offer ★★★★★★★★
★★★★★★ Top Sites to Buy Aged GitHub Accounts in 2025
Buying old GitHub accounts is a topic that's come up more and more frequently in programming communities, freelancing circles, and even cybersecurity conversations. The idea might sound simple—acquire an account with established history and use it for your own purposes—but the reality is far more complex than just swapping a username and password. I'm going to take you through a nuanced exploration of this phenomenon: what motivates people to buy these accounts, the legitimate and shadowy reasons behind the trade, the risks that might not be immediately obvious, and finally, my take on what best practices look like if you decide to engage in this activity.
If you want to know more or have any queries, just knock us here-
24 Hours Reply/Contact
✅➤Telegram : SmmBanks
✅➤Whatsapp : +1 (424) 505-0399
✅➤Email : smmbanksteam@gmail.com
1) Start with an Authentic,
Strong Profile
Your profile is the first impression visitors form about you. A well-crafted bio, curated pinned repositories, and transparent activity tell a compelling story.
Concise bio: Highlight core strengths, languages, and interests. Mention real projects you actively contribute to.
Pinned repositories: Choose a small, focused set that represents your best work and learning trajectory. Quality over quantity matters.
Professional presence: Use a friendly photo, a clean username, and a link to your portfolio or personal site. Ensure contact options are clear for potential collaborators or employers.
Our Accounts Features
100% Satisfaction Guaranteed
100% Recovery Guaranty (Within 30 Days)
Realistic Photo Attached Accounts
Mostly USA Profile’s Bio and Photo
One Month Replacement Guarantee
24/7 Customer Support
Established Reputation
Enhanced Security
Ready-to-Use
Project History
★★★Available in the USA, UK, CA and AU
If you want to know more or have any queries, just knock us here-
24 Hours Reply/Contact
✅➤Telegram : SmmBanks
✅➤Whatsapp : +1 (424) 505-0399
✅➤Email : smmbanksteam@gmail.com
Build Repositories with Clear Purpose
Repositories are GitHub’s currency. Each one should clearly convey the problem, your Here’s the bottom line: while the appeal of skipping the reputation grind with an old GitHub account is strong, the risks and ethical costs are just as real. It’s a shortcut that frequently leads to dead ends, lost investments, and damaged reputations. My strongest advice—build your profile honestly and take pride in organic growth. The open source community thrives on authenticity, and your personal journey will be richer for it!
Documentation as code: Inline comments, API docs, and a developer guide help others reuse and extend your work.
If you want to know more or have any queries, just knock us here-
24 Hours Reply/Contact
✅➤Telegram : SmmBanks
✅➤Whatsapp : +1 (424) 505-0399
✅➤Email : smmbanksteam@gmail.com
A legitimate, high-quality GitHub presence is built through purposeful content, open collaboration, and ongoing stewardship. By focusing on real projects, thorough documentation, and healthy community practices, you’ll attract meaningful contributions and establish lasting credibility. If you’d like, I can tailor this article for a particular audience (beginners, a specific language ecosystem, or open-source maintainers) or adjust the tone to be more technical or approachable.”
―
★★ 2025 Guide: Buying Old GitHub Accounts Safely & Legally
➤➤ SMMBanks.com➤➤#SMMBanks
Looking to buy old GitHub accounts? Smmbanks offers high-quality GitHub accounts at affordable prices. Whether for personal use or business needs, our accounts are reliable and secure. Shop with confidence and enjoy fast, secure transactions. Get the best deals now!
★★★★★★★★ SmmBanks Offer ★★★★★★★★
★★★★★★ Top Sites to Buy Aged GitHub Accounts in 2025
Buying old GitHub accounts is a topic that's come up more and more frequently in programming communities, freelancing circles, and even cybersecurity conversations. The idea might sound simple—acquire an account with established history and use it for your own purposes—but the reality is far more complex than just swapping a username and password. I'm going to take you through a nuanced exploration of this phenomenon: what motivates people to buy these accounts, the legitimate and shadowy reasons behind the trade, the risks that might not be immediately obvious, and finally, my take on what best practices look like if you decide to engage in this activity.
If you want to know more or have any queries, just knock us here-
24 Hours Reply/Contact
✅➤Telegram : SmmBanks
✅➤Whatsapp : +1 (424) 505-0399
✅➤Email : smmbanksteam@gmail.com
1) Start with an Authentic,
Strong Profile
Your profile is the first impression visitors form about you. A well-crafted bio, curated pinned repositories, and transparent activity tell a compelling story.
Concise bio: Highlight core strengths, languages, and interests. Mention real projects you actively contribute to.
Pinned repositories: Choose a small, focused set that represents your best work and learning trajectory. Quality over quantity matters.
Professional presence: Use a friendly photo, a clean username, and a link to your portfolio or personal site. Ensure contact options are clear for potential collaborators or employers.
Our Accounts Features
100% Satisfaction Guaranteed
100% Recovery Guaranty (Within 30 Days)
Realistic Photo Attached Accounts
Mostly USA Profile’s Bio and Photo
One Month Replacement Guarantee
24/7 Customer Support
Established Reputation
Enhanced Security
Ready-to-Use
Project History
★★★Available in the USA, UK, CA and AU
If you want to know more or have any queries, just knock us here-
24 Hours Reply/Contact
✅➤Telegram : SmmBanks
✅➤Whatsapp : +1 (424) 505-0399
✅➤Email : smmbanksteam@gmail.com
Build Repositories with Clear Purpose
Repositories are GitHub’s currency. Each one should clearly convey the problem, your Here’s the bottom line: while the appeal of skipping the reputation grind with an old GitHub account is strong, the risks and ethical costs are just as real. It’s a shortcut that frequently leads to dead ends, lost investments, and damaged reputations. My strongest advice—build your profile honestly and take pride in organic growth. The open source community thrives on authenticity, and your personal journey will be richer for it!
Documentation as code: Inline comments, API docs, and a developer guide help others reuse and extend your work.
If you want to know more or have any queries, just knock us here-
24 Hours Reply/Contact
✅➤Telegram : SmmBanks
✅➤Whatsapp : +1 (424) 505-0399
✅➤Email : smmbanksteam@gmail.com
A legitimate, high-quality GitHub presence is built through purposeful content, open collaboration, and ongoing stewardship. By focusing on real projects, thorough documentation, and healthy community practices, you’ll attract meaningful contributions and establish lasting credibility. If you’d like, I can tailor this article for a particular audience (beginners, a specific language ecosystem, or open-source maintainers) or adjust the tone to be more technical or approachable.”
―