San Antonio Public Library discussion
Complete the following sentence:


Never read A Wrinkle in Time? Say it ain't so!!
There are a bunch of "works of great literature" in general fiction I've never read. (No Tolstoy or James Joyce, for example.) But I can't think of anything particuarly shocking to have not read. Sorry, Dan!
There are a bunch of "works of great literature" in general fiction I've never read. (No Tolstoy or James Joyce, for example.) But I can't think of anything particuarly shocking to have not read. Sorry, Dan!

*snicker* What a bunch of heathens I work with!
Um. I've never read Slaughterhouse-Five or Do Androids dream of electric sheep?. Is that shocking?
Um. I've never read Slaughterhouse-Five or Do Androids dream of electric sheep?. Is that shocking?


Tyler wrote: "I haven't read twilight...."
Somehow that doesn't surprise me. After all, you were never a teenage girl. *grin* And having spent time as a teenage girl seems to be the biggest indicator that you'll like the series.
Somehow that doesn't surprise me. After all, you were never a teenage girl. *grin* And having spent time as a teenage girl seems to be the biggest indicator that you'll like the series.
Dan wrote: "Bless Me, Ultima, Treat yourself if you have a chance: http://sapl.sat.lib.tx.us/record=b105..."
I agree with Dan. It's not exactly a readalike, but if you enjoyed To Kill A Mockingbird, I'd say it's likely you'll enjoy Bless Me, Ultima.
I agree with Dan. It's not exactly a readalike, but if you enjoyed To Kill A Mockingbird, I'd say it's likely you'll enjoy Bless Me, Ultima.


Beverly wrote: "I have never read any of the Wizard of Oz books, even though I have been a children's librarian for more than 30 years; and even though I watched Judy Garland's Dorothy every year for decades."
I can understand that. The movie version is so fulfilling that you don't feel the need to seek out 'more' in the form of the original book.
I can understand that. The movie version is so fulfilling that you don't feel the need to seek out 'more' in the form of the original book.




I did read Northanger Abbey and really enjoyed it. I had to read Sense and Sensibility in high school, but don't remember if I liked it or not. However, I have seen all of these books in some movie version or other. And I do plan to read the rest of Jane Austen's books at some point. I even bought a copy of Pride and Prejudice recently.


Dacia wrote: "I love A Wrinkle in Time, but I think I read Hitchiker too late in life... It was ok, but not earthshattering. ;-)"
So, I never really read Lord of the Rings until just before the movies came out. I had been steeped in fantasy fiction, written fantasy fiction, but never gotten around to Lord of the Rings.
I can't stand the book, to be honest, but one of my problems early on was separating that characters like Gimli and Legolas (and, to a somewhat lesser degree, Aragorn) were not stereotypies, but archetypes... all the other dwarves I've read that were like that because they were somewhat emulating Gimli, not because Gimli was "just another dwarf like all the others."
Sometime in there, I set out to read a bunch of classics and classic authors. The library system I worked in at the time had a shelf of "classics", and so I started clearing those out, but I also worked on the famous Appendix N list... from the back of 1979's Dungeon Master's Guide, it showed a lot of the fiction that was influential on Dungeons and Dragons, and thus on a lot of modern fantasy fiction.
Thus, I don't know that there's much that folks are surprised I haven't read... unless you count big authors like James Patterson or the like.
So, I never really read Lord of the Rings until just before the movies came out. I had been steeped in fantasy fiction, written fantasy fiction, but never gotten around to Lord of the Rings.
I can't stand the book, to be honest, but one of my problems early on was separating that characters like Gimli and Legolas (and, to a somewhat lesser degree, Aragorn) were not stereotypies, but archetypes... all the other dwarves I've read that were like that because they were somewhat emulating Gimli, not because Gimli was "just another dwarf like all the others."
Sometime in there, I set out to read a bunch of classics and classic authors. The library system I worked in at the time had a shelf of "classics", and so I started clearing those out, but I also worked on the famous Appendix N list... from the back of 1979's Dungeon Master's Guide, it showed a lot of the fiction that was influential on Dungeons and Dragons, and thus on a lot of modern fantasy fiction.
Thus, I don't know that there's much that folks are surprised I haven't read... unless you count big authors like James Patterson or the like.

I still have not read them.

That's OK, because the kids knew about them without the librarian's help anyway!

Mariya wrote: "I have never read Wuthering Heights or anything by Austen. I went through a Hardy phase in high school, so Austen seemed too tame for my liking."
Tame? I found them boring and tedious. I never managed to finish anything by her. *checks for flying tomatoes* Yes, I know that's pretty shocking for an English Lit Major.
Tame? I found them boring and tedious. I never managed to finish anything by her. *checks for flying tomatoes* Yes, I know that's pretty shocking for an English Lit Major.

I went through an attempt to read the "Classics shelf" at HPL a few years ago, and so read Northanger Abbey by Austen, and pre-quarantine, I listened to Pride and Prejudice. I find Austen to be enjoyable in small doses; she has a terrific use of language and turn of phrase, but the plots are generally not what I'm looking for.
Shannan wrote: "Oh no, as much as I enjoyed parts of Pride and Prejudice, parts are also incredibly boring. FYI, Wuthering Heights was written by Emily Bronte (it's easy to mix up the Brontes and Austen, really). ..."
Oops! Obviously I'm not a fan of Bronte either. ;-)
Oops! Obviously I'm not a fan of Bronte either. ;-)


Also Dracula, despite having a fascination with vampires since I was a kid. My first official chapter book was "about" dracula but not the actual book.

I feel ya! I didnt read harry potter until after college but i used to write hp fanfiction with a friend in middle school and he'd always have to fill me in on the specifics.



But reading through these comments, you should all definitely read Harry Potter, The Hitchhikers Guide and Lord of the Rings. Shame on you. =)



Well, a bunch of those 'classic' titles such as Moby Dick and The Great Gatsby suffer because they're inflicted upon people at school and we're told we they're "great works". How many teenagers are really the right audience to appreciate/understand those titles when their teacher assigns them as homework?
Books mentioned in this topic
The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy (other topics)A Wrinkle in Time (other topics)
The Giver (other topics)
Twilight (other topics)
There are those canonical works of literature and fiction which many people feel are essential reading, however, despite this perception of universality not everyone is able to carve out time to read them. Recently, I started a minor stir among some friends when I admitted that I had never read A Wrinkle in Time by Madeleine L'Engle (http://sapl.sat.lib.tx.us/record=b124...) (I know, see... you're shocked too!) As a devout Fantasy reader, this is huge; so, in an effort to save face and prove a point I put the gauntlet on the ground -- surely there are others just like me who have never read a work considered canonical in a particular genre. So, let's hear it.