Cyberpunk discussion
Cyberpunk Itself
>
Who took the punk out of cyberpunk?
date
newest »


And I don't get people's problem with the game being named Cyberpunk. I mean, what do they expect, that's the name of the pen'n'paper game. Like if Vampire: The Masquerade - Bloodlines got Vampire: The Masquerade cut out of the title.


Instead, it has grown up and there are certainly stories to be told that suit our current world view and relationships with technology. With social networks, personal devices, bot engines,dashboard overlays, social divides, and the Anonymous movement, you might even argue we are on the cusp of cyberpunk 2.0--with many stories yet to be told.
The difference, of course, is how we see the environments and style of the 20-teens. That is a changing variable, as is the way we integrate our lives with technology. Maybe a self driving bus isn't cyberpunk, but certainly, overriding that programming and driving it from your basement is a classic extrapolation of the attitude.
While cyberpunk evolves,I'd argue that there are narrative elements which are the more important aspects defining the genre that must remain, at which point we digress into elements of noir. That is exactly what you have with most of the old Gibson stories, and you can see it in Strange Days all the same, though if that film embraced itself at cyberpunk, you might see Lenny living in those memory tapes, and likely confusing his reality. Instead of corrupt law enforcement officers, the entire system would have been rigged, pervasive, obstructing. Lastly, the memory decks would not have been an isolated technology; it would have been one of many devices changing the lives of the characters.
The noir though, the seedy bars and back alley deals, the loser in love with the singer, it's all there.
*More later.

You have stated that cyberpunk can be reduced to one phrase: “high tech, low life”. Here is where I disagree.
"Punk" is more a philosophy. Anarchy. Anti-establishment. Our protagonists rail against the boundaries imposed upon them by social norms/mores.
On the next level we might incorporate the Marxist Notion of "infiltratism." In this, our protagonists appear outwardly to be a part of the establishment only to move in and break it down.
Add to this the technology that gives us the flavor and backdrop we love in this genre and we open the playing field.
Here, Stephenson succeeds marvelously as many of his protagonists begin this way and he usually likes to look at various class levels.
Max Barry might also join the fray with his novels "Jennifer Government" and "Machine Man." (On a side note his other two novels, "Company" and "Syrup" are superb)
Herein, for me, beats the heart of cyberpunk.
If we reduce the genre to the literal translation solely predicated upon the facade worn by the main characters then, for me, the substance is lacking.
Cyberpunk beats in the hearts of many by my estimation, but it is the rare author who can make it work.


The Cyberpunk became Reality. Nowdays everyone is connected to the matrix, which is portrayed by facebook, google, ebay and etc. Punks and model citzens... we are all part of it.

I have nothing against cross genre work.

What is the controversial about the history of the subject?
It's late, and I'd love to expand on my thoughts, but it will have to wait for another day. Thanks for the great topic for discussion. This group could use the activity.