Queereaders discussion

Faun
This topic is about Faun
33 views
group reads > Faun

Comments Showing 1-7 of 7 (7 new)    post a comment »
dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by Nancy (new)

Nancy | 2838 comments Start discussion here.

Please remember to hide significant plot spoilers using the html code listed in the (some html is ok) link above the comment box.


message 2: by Tim (new) - rated it 2 stars

Tim | 152 comments I’ll kick off the discussion for Faun. Overall, I found this book a disappointment. The writing and editing were mediocre which made the reading cumbersome. However, for purposes of discussion, I’m curious as to what others thought of the ending. SPOILERS in the remainder of this post.

(view spoiler)


message 3: by Mel, Moderator (new) - rated it 2 stars

Mel | 82 comments Mod
I loved the idea but also found the writing clunky and awkward. I kept wishing it was written better. I really thought the idea/story was a fairly unique one, but the writing style just kept distracting me from my enjoyment.


Mark | 25 comments I'm about half way through and I don't notice any problem with the style. It fits well with the perspective of a 15 year old guy I think.


Mark | 25 comments Finished now. I enjoyed this book a lot and I think it has an interesting a complex message.


message 6: by Bill, Moderator (new)

Bill (kernos) | 2988 comments Mod
In response to Dan's last spoiler paragraph, since Fauns are gods/demigods, I suppose anything is possible ;-)

I am reminded of a book I read long ago, '70s or '80s, a pornoid spoof of epic fantasy. All I remember is that the king had the Faun problem, but it was continuous causing environmental damage and the dwarve's penes were long and spring-shaped. They moved by bouncing along on their springs :-) I recall it being very funny and would love to find it again. Does this sound familiar to anyone?


message 7: by Mark (last edited Jun 19, 2013 06:22PM) (new) - rated it 4 stars

Mark | 25 comments "Just keep asking yourself the question, the question is what’s important, the answer not so much.”

It is like a Zen Koan.

I wonder if he is also talking about a distinction between biology and psychological identity. We might be gay, straight, bi, trans, a satyr.. things we can't change and so therefore should't worry about, but does that completely define who we are? Is there ever an answer to the question of who we are?


back to top