Another possible question that I got back from WikiAnswers was: What is negation logic? That seemed potentially relevant so I clicked for the answer & got: This Question Has Not Been Answered Yet.
IN HONOR OF THIS, I HEREBY ANNOUNCE, THE "cONVENIENCE'S 1ST & LAST THEOREM PRIZE":
I WILL TAKE OUT TO (A FAIRLY CHEAP BUT NOT TOO SHABBY) DINNER WHOEVER ANSWERS THE QUESTION:
Does negation logic help solve the problem of whether the warning symbol on your HODA INTIGRA flashes when supernatural horses are about to eat Sara [Sara being the positive number here]?
Lardy! being an 'almost completely unknown writer who doesn't even have more than 5 friends who'll ever read his bks' [I wonder what the mathematical expression for that is?!] is fun! But, I digress.
It's time to bring out the heavy hitters: let's add Special Instance Subtraction Commutativity to the Unstable Problem. In order to express "~H is the negation of ~E", I'll harken back to "(m - n = n - m) -> to x". Thus we have:
~H x ~E
Elegant, eh? To recapitulate: in English, "~H x ~E" might mean: "Not-Horse is the mirror image on the negative side of the number line of the positive representation of the unexceptional." Simplifying that in standard formulaic reductionist manner by equating the negative reflection of the unexceptional w/ the exceptional, we end up w/: "Not-Horse is exceptional". Therefore, while under usual circumstances a non-existent horse cannot negate an apple, this supernatural horse is an exception & can do whatever it damn well pleases - such as eat a 'real' apple. Get it? That's why a positive number divided by a negative one is negative.
IN HONOR OF THIS, I HEREBY ANNOUNCE, THE "cONVENIENCE'S 1ST & LAST THEOREM PRIZE":
I WILL TAKE OUT TO (A FAIRLY CHEAP BUT NOT TOO SHABBY) DINNER WHOEVER ANSWERS THE QUESTION:
Does negation logic help solve the problem of whether the warning symbol on your HODA INTIGRA flashes when supernatural horses are about to eat Sara [Sara being the positive number here]?
Lardy! being an 'almost completely unknown writer who doesn't even have more than 5 friends who'll ever read his bks' [I wonder what the mathematical expression for that is?!] is fun! But, I digress.
It's time to bring out the heavy hitters: let's add Special Instance Subtraction Commutativity to the Unstable Problem. In order to express "~H is the negation of ~E", I'll harken back to "(m - n = n - m) -> to x". Thus we have:
~H x ~E
Elegant, eh? To recapitulate: in English, "~H x ~E" might mean: "Not-Horse is the mirror image on the negative side of the number line of the positive representation of the unexceptional." Simplifying that in standard formulaic reductionist manner by equating the negative reflection of the unexceptional w/ the exceptional, we end up w/: "Not-Horse is exceptional". Therefore, while under usual circumstances a non-existent horse cannot negate an apple, this supernatural horse is an exception & can do whatever it damn well pleases - such as eat a 'real' apple. Get it? That's why a positive number divided by a negative one is negative.