twilight lovers! discussion

These are kind of funny...

http://www.moviemistakes.com/blogpost84

LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
MOVING PLANT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Yeah...but ya know what I never even noticed any of these things and I have seen the movie like 12 times...

me 2...................

It was good but not as good as the book...I think New Moon will be much better.

I agree. Ive seen the golden compass, derected by Chris whats-his-last-name and Im a fan of the books and I thought it was really good!

I agree...the unoffical trailer for New Moon makes it look like they have thought it through more this time. Although the actors are saying they are spending a lot of time in Italy which kind of worries me. I guess we have to wait and see in November!

Carrie, it shouldn't worry you that they're spending so much time in italy, its only natural, action sequences take longer to film its a fact, and we know that a lot of the action does happen in italy.

Also, James breaks her leg right above the knee, but later (prom), she is wearing a boot...on her lower leg....

How do they find these people to name the mistakes? They need to get them to work on films. Films would never have movie mistakes ever again!

I'd have never noticed any of those things. My sister only caught one, and that was the thing about the bracelet on Bella's arm in the scene where Edward sucked the venom out.

wow!! i just noticed the tubes on her face!!

i think the book was way better and the new moon trailer looks really great! better than twilight! in trailer have you noticed that when bella and laurent are in the field and then jake comes along when she runs her cloths change! its not a mistake there must be to events happening in that field!! can't wait!! i wanna go to the new moon premire does anyone no when it is!!!!

Well, official hollywood premiere's (the ones before the world wide premiere), are usually a week ahead of the premiere for everyone. So maybe November 13th?

Haha. I like when there is mistakes in books/movies.

I'm really bad at that when it comes to shows too. I always focus on what they want you to focus on, so I don't pay attention to the camera guy in the corner.

You have to be able to notice more than a few things at once.

in boring movies i actually have a hard time watching what you are supposed to be watching. i watch the random people in the background. but that was not the case with twilight. i was very into the movie.

Did it... *Dazzle* you?

(Sorry I had to take the cheap joke, it was too easy to pass up)

i think that they should have used a different edward. sorry edward lovers. i am a jacob girl.

Join the club. :)

i think edward and jacob did a good job at their roles. so im on both teams.. lol

Switzerland, cool.

hehe, i saw the mistakes. i hope its not the same way in new moon...

thats cool, I never noticed any of that!!!

me neither

Also Bella wasn't a very good actor...

Rachel wrote: "Also Bella wasn't a very good actor..."

I agree, never know though she may have improved in the next one...going by the pics tho she still looks really grumpy!

yay i agree! i completely imagined bella as *prettier* and kristen stewart is so manly-sounding! could her voice BE any lower? grrrooosssss.

One friend suggested Danielle Panabaker, and I have to admit, she looks the part.

yes! one of my friends actually wanted anna kendrick (jessica) to be bella. idk about that, but i can see it.

Mellady77 wrote: "One friend suggested Danielle Panabaker, and I have to admit, she looks the part."

My friend made that same suggestion and after looking her up on IMDB.com I think she would have been great.

Danielle Panabaker

yes. and her voice (unlike kristens) does not sound like a sullen pubescent boy.

Yeah, Danielle was one of the females I've thought about replacing Kristen.

I am SSOOOOOOOOOOO mad at that movie. it turned it into more of a romance than it was supposed to be and those bad parts in the book were magnified in the movie! :^P

I don't think it was a "romance" type movie. I think it was darker than it was supposed to be.

i don' tink who you are saying should have played Bella is really, whats the word um right i guess! cos that girl in really pretty but in the book Bella isn't meant to be pretty and now since i have seen twilight so many times everytime someone mentions Bella Swan i instantly get an image of Kristen and its the same for all the actor and characters! lol

Yeah I know she is supposed to be really plain but in that picture Danielle has her make up all done and everything she can also look really plain. Now the only one I ever see is Kristen but I wish they would have picked someone wlse from the beginning.

I don't think they're going for plain anymore. Did you see the recent stuff? Kristen has all this beauty enhancment. There isn't one shot where she isn't glamed up. Lots of lipsticks, and blushes, and facial sculpting. I don't think they really care about the descriptions anymore.

Nah, they are trying to push the Twilight make-up line.

Really I think she looks about the same as always in the trailers. Only the one pic of her looks different to me and they always do that digital enhanced crap for the posters and crap.

The Twilight make-up line is not associated with Summit. If it were, Summit would be selling it. It's from DuWap.

I actually like some of the make up.

You make make up for DuWap's Twilight line? O_O

Mellady77 wrote: "Danielle Panabaker
"

Danielle looks a little too profesional and bright for Bella.

Lol, too bright for Bella.

...You might be right.

yea, i don't think she strikes me as a Bella! if u get what i mean! lol

Lol, yeah.

i agree with you mellady77 about danielle. Twilight was kinda dark she seems very bright. I had hoped they would show more of her clumsiness. I liked Bella in the book more than the movie Bella. make sense?