Classics and the Western Canon discussion
Ovid - Metamorphoses
>
Metamorphoses Book 11
date
newest »


I started to respond that Venus did something somewhat similar about accepting, rather than persecuting, Psyche after Cupid received sanction of their marriage from Jupiter, with Psyche even receiving the ambrosia of eternal life. Then, I realized this story isn't in Ovid!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cupid_an...
http://www.sacred-texts.com/cla/cap/

On Orpheus, most heroes of aniquity are sadly tragic, as if to complete a movement or something, so the most noble goes out bad, as in Jesus Christ..I think it's all a mystery paradox..testing the boundaries, so goes for any kind of suffering and nonsensical cruel and tragic things that goes on down here on Earth..

That's certainly part of it. But is that all? Or is what you wish for the problem? Would the Greeks and Romans have seen it more as a condemnation of foolish wishes, as a condemnation of excess generally (remember Moderation!), or as a condemnation of greed and love of money?
I like to think that the myth may have more layers to it than just the obvious. Of course, that could just be wishful thinking.


I've read another version of the myth, in which Orpheus succeeded in bringing Eurydice back the second time, though it was much harder than the first. But I can't recall where it came from.
Hades in the Greek mythology is a curious place. How exactly is it different from the world of the living, apart from the locale and scenery?

"When the gods wish to punish us, they answer our prayers."
--Oscar Wilde
There have been times when I really wanted something, and it didn't work out. I have since been very grateful that it didn't work out.

That is true, although I think when foolish prayers are answered, it is not necessarily punitive, but could be educational instead. If Midas had not have his prayer answered, he would not have realized the folly of his greed. In the same way, children are allowed to make their own mistakes and learn from experience.

That is true, although I think when foolish..."
Another Wilde quote:
"Experience Is the Name Everyone Gives to Their Mistakes."
I agree Nemo. Without our mistakes, we would know nothing about life.

Not everyone, only those with a heart to learn. :)
I'm quite amused that Midas was gifted with the ears of an ass for being a tasteless music critic. I suspect that's the prayer of all artists.

--Oscar Wilde"
Tiberius -- was hoping you might have this among favorite quotations on your profile (so could add to my own collection). Just went through about fifteen pages of Wilde quotations without finding it -- but was fun seeing so many thoughts that sliced through fog. I forget how talented Wilde was.

That is true, although I think..."
I guess it's true, trial and error, blind men walking, human history, the empirical method: experience, mistakes..

That's a great question. I wish I knew the answer to it. One difference seems to be that the dead, while they can talk to the living (see the Odyssey, and Aeneid), and to some extent have bodily existence, don't have bodies in the same form as they had on earth. I don't recall any description of Hades where the dead eat or drink (as the gods clearly do, though not human food). It seems to be a sort of bland existence, if that; but it doesn't seem to be a place of punishment as it is in most religious thought.

Excellent point. Reminiscent of Edison's saying, when he tried something that didn't work, and I'm paraphrasing not quoting exactly since I'm too lazy to go look it up, I didn't fail, I succeeded in finding out a way that didn't work.

The big difference seems to be that there is absolutely nothing joyful. Never.
And because of a different time-concept never really means never over there.
In short, it must feel somewhat like life in an office - without coffee breaks.

That's a great question. I wish I knew..."
I think or rather I guess hell, as heaven, must be unimaginable in sense and mind, blown away, I guess like a child seeing all the things for the same time, feeling such an unexpected, unbelievable phenomenon..we have ideas or notions of reality from nature and art, it must be corresponding with some other source, but the human or self or soul experience I think could be as approachable as describing the sea or a forest to an ancient desert dweller..I imagine...

Therefore the need for suffering and the dark and the need of the human condition..

In Odyssey Book XI, we read that Odysseus gave the dead sacrificial blood to drink in exchange for Tiresias' utterance, and Achilles exulted over news of his son's exploits. So it seems that they can still "eat, drink and be merry". When Orpheus was reunited with Eurydice, they must have felt joy?

In Odyssey Book XI, we read that Odysseus gave the dead sac..."
A theme that the writers often give the departed is desire to know the fates of the living.

Just three data points, Patrice:
Etymology of orphan from Merriam-Webster Unabridged online: "Late Latin orphanus, from Greek orphanos; akin to Old English ierfe inheritance, Old High German erbi, Old Norse arfi, Gothic arbi, Old Irish orbe inheritance, Latin orbus orphaned, bereft, Sanskrit arbha small, weak"
Orpheus: "Perhaps related to Greek ορφνη (orphne) meaning 'the darkness of night'."
http://www.behindthename.com/name/orp...
See also etymology here (indicates "orphan" as likely cognate): http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orpheus
Interesting side-bar from the wiki article: "The earliest literary reference to Orpheus is a two-word fragment of the sixth-century BC lyric poet Ibycus: onomaklyton Orphēn ('Orpheus famous-of-name'). He is not mentioned in Homer or Hesiod. Most ancient sources accept his historical existence; Aristotle is an exception.

In other words, they gossip, watch tabloid news and entertainment. :)

In other words, they gossip, watch tabloid news and entertainment. :)"
Well, I had in mind the kinder twist of missing family and friends, but the characters in Dante's Divine Comedy were sometimes after the salacious stuff.

I think the myth does qualify as a happy ending, after all, what difference does the location (the underworld) make if they are together and happy? The poem doesn't give any indication that the underworld is a bad place, in fact I can't remember any information about the underworld.
I thought the part of the myth in Book X where Orpheus disobeys instructions and turns back to look at Eurydice was telling the Greeks and Romans that when a god speaks and gives instructions, they are to be followed without question. In Book XI, the ending of the myth seems to say that the gods can be merciful if they choose to be, and when properly asked. Again, the ending of the myth doesn't indicate that the underworld is a terrible place, but, of course, I'm working on limited information.

..."
I wonder if in the case of Midas we are seeing an evolution of gods developing qualities of offering mercy when the human repents? I can't really tell if "evolution" is the right word since I haven't read many myths and don't know anything about the chronology of their creation.
Another obvious lesson to us would be that we'd better think about all of the consequences of seeking a goal or desire before we push too far ahead, else we could live to regret it.
By the way, can anyone tell me why the Thracian women were so angry that they killed Orpheus? I don't see where he did anything to them or did I miss something?


"
The Thracian women were Maenads (Bacchantes). Ovid says their rage is "mindless", but it may have a root in the fact that Orpheus is the son of Apollo, who traditionally is opposed to Bacchus, the god of the Maenads. But according to Ovid, Bacchus grieves for Orpheus and punishes the Maenads, so it can't be said that they were acting on Bacchus' behalf either. Perhaps the most that can be said is that the Maenads were truly mad, totally irrational. This is consistent with the way they are usually depicted, as an irrational force of nature.

(At least Bacchus doesn't take Orpheus's murder lying down.)
Then we find another myth which warns us not to toy with the gods, but with a twist. Midas is granted one wish, but he chooses foolishly and is headed for death. But this time we find, unusually, that the gods, who can be cruel and merciless, can also be merciful; when Midas confesses his error and begs for mercy, he actually gets it. I can't offhand recall another myth where the gods reversed themselves in this way.