Anglicans discussion
General
>
What's on Our Minds??



I was looking at how Booklady does the Benidict bookclub book discussions, and thought it was good how they had a new thread for each chapter. That is one way that if someone (me) is a slow reader, they don't bump into a lot of spoilers and see the plot unfold before they have got to those parts.

So click on "All" in the discussion topics and find that thread I started for Summer 09 reading and start popping out some ideas. Guess I'll rename the thread, LOL!





I grew up Roman Catholic at the time of the transition between Vatican I & II. So I remember the smells and bells of the Roman Catholic Church. As a child I loved church. I felt close to God there and I wanted to be there. Yet as I grew older, I felt that it got harder to find God in hip folk mass. I was not finding the answer in Bob Dylan's "Blowing in the Wind." Yes, we actually sang that song in worship! There were good changes in Vatican II, but there were compromises in some of the parishes with the use of secular music in worship. There is no doubt through that that early exposure to God, it touched in me a desire for more, a desire to go deeper with the Lord. I strayed during my early teen years and got into the transcendental meditation and the eastern religions. Then when I was 16, God drew me back through Jesus. My story is in the introduction discussion.
The church I attend now is an Anglican Church that worships in the Anglo Catholic way, with incense, and the chanting of the psalms. Yet, we are a very evangelical congregation. We talk of "knowing Jesus," and have used Timothy Keller's materials in our adult Sunday school.
Isn't it so great that Ann Rice went from an atheist to a Christian? I hope many are lead to Christ through reading her journey.
Thanks for "biting." It was fun to find someone who read the book!
Blessings,
Karen

This forum looks like just my cup of tea. I only wish it were a bit more active. I haven't spent much time on Goodreads, but I'm always looking for good tips on books to read, and it's hard to find people whose taste and perspectives are similar to mine. Anglicans in general tend to be more liberal; orthodox Anglicans tend to be more interested in current controversies than in reflection and spirituality, and evangelicals are just too evangelical while Catholics are just too Catholic .
Thanks for the nice introduction to your experiences. I'll check out your story in the introduction discussion.

I think our group could get more active. We have had some really great discussions and book talk in the past. Skylar from our group has young children, but has been active in past discussions. James is a newly wed, so he has been out of the loop, since the wedding. Greg and I are in touch through church, and he loves book talk.
Everyone:
So folks we have someone interested in book talk. Lets share about what we are reading now and just see where that takes us.



It is kind of cool that we can post photos. I posted a few church photos and will post a photo of my favorite reading spot. It would be fun if others posted some photos. Maybe a photo of their church, or their favorite reading spot?

Son Of Hamas
Has anyone else read or heard about it? It sounds really good. I read on the back cover that Yousef converted to Christianity. I'd love to have company reading it, anyone? well if any in the group do read it. Post some thoughts or your review in the group.
So folks, what are you reading that you are enjoying? Or what are you itching to read?

Anyway, in addition to the tons of philosophy books I'm reading for school, I've been (slowly) working my way through N.T. Wright's latest book After You Believe. So far, so good, and I'm already going to stamp this one with my recommendation.





Evangelical on the Canterbury Trail sounds interesting as well. Oh Kevin, I'm glad you joined the group :)
Anyone else?



Kevin, welcome to Anglicanism! I grew up in the Methodist Church (before it lost its anchor and its mind, deserting its heritage). I always knew who John Wesley was, of course, but never knew he was an Anglican priest all his life. The Methodist service, in my day there, was essentially that of Morning Prayer and the Eucharist service from the Book of Common Prayer of the Church of England, though I didn't know what that was until I "discovered" the Episcopal Church in my twenties, by attending a Bach Choir concert in an Episcopal church and perusing the books in the pew rack, one of which was the 1928 BCP. I started attending that church and immediately felt I had found my way home. For me, the key was weekly Eucharist and the wonderful sense of "reformed catholicity" that was "spiritually delicious" and made historical sense. I felt truly connected to the Church, across the centuries, worshiping in this way. As a student of both Philosophy and Psychology, I especially appreciated and reveled in the singing of not just hymns, but all the other parts of the service of the sung mass, since I knew that singing employed both sides of the brain (as opposed to plain speech )thus resonating with St Augustine's statement "He who sings prays twice".
It didn't take long to discover, to my great disappointment, that there was not an homogenous practice of worship within all parishes the Episcopal Church, nor was there a single thread of doctrine, especially in the Diocese of Pittsburgh. There were Calvinists, Arminians, Laditudinarians, Catholics and many who I could not understand why they were there, since what they wanted (and complained loudly that they didn’t have it) was easily found in the Presbyterian Church or the Methodist church I left behind. It was maddening!!! And at times, I wondered if it was worth it. Many Sundays I would come home thinking "up with this I cannot put"! I wondered what the “real” Anglicanism was. Though I was Anglican in my beliefs and worship, I had not yet adopted, or even realized there was such a thing as "The Anglican Ethos". It did help to discover that Pittsburgh, along with a couple other dioceses were nor the norm in so far as representing the breadth of Anglicanism (even though they think they are). That was over thirty years ago.
After the Canterbury Trail, comes the path to true Anglicanism which truly is a unique window on the world, an ethos unto itself, and reveals the sense among the seeming disparity of ideas that make up the history and identity of the Anglicanism. The Episcopal Church has, unfortunately, gone off on its own path which can no longer be covered by any stretch of the umbrella of the breadth of Anglicanism. It is possible for a body to belong to the Anglican Communion, but not be Anglican in its ethos.
Along the way, I have found several books very refreshing, supportive, informative, corrective and "on the mark" in their description and explanation of the Way of Anglicanism. I encountered them in a graduate course in "Anglican Studies" that was offered, at one time, as an official seminary training program for the Episcopal Church, offered through the academic auspices of Duquesne University, and supplemented with classes taught by priests from the Episcopal Church, such as Kieth Ackerman (now Bishop Ackerman, instrumental in the formation of the new Anglican Province of the Anglican Church of North America). The books, like the Anglican Studies program and myself, are of an Anglo-Catholic perspective, which, in my studies and experience, I have come to believe is the truest form of Anglicanism, having a tolerance for a breadth of doctrinal positions that all fall within a "reformed catholic" tradition, without the excess and error of Rome or the heresy and iconoclasm of the Continental Reformation, but in tune with the Elizabethan Settlement.
The five books are: WHAT IS ANGLICANISM, by Urban T. Holmes III, Morehouse-Barlow, Inc.; THE STUDY OF ANGLICANISM, by Stephen Sykes, John Booty and Jonathan Knight, Fortress Press, Raised Ed.; ANGLICANISM, by Stephen Neill, Oxford University Press, THE OXFORD MOVEMENT, by C. Brad Faught, Penn State Press; and A THEOLOGICAL INTRODUCTION TO THE THIRTY-NINE AETICLES OF THE CHURCH OF ENGLAND, by E. J. Bicknell, Wipf and Stock. This last book is extremely important because the Thirty-Nine Articles are very "Reformation Protestant" in nature, though purposely ambiguous in places to allow a latitude of interpretation. The book is the classic Anglo-Catholic interpretation of that latitude provided, as a part of the Elizabethan Settlement. You might also want to check out the Cambridge Platonist doctrine of the “Candle of The Lord”. It harmonizes the Calvinists’ position on “total depravity” with the Arminian doctrine of “prevenient grace”, harmonizing the concepts of “predestination”, “salvation by grace alone” and “free will” – very Anglican!.
The Canterbury Trail has been well traveled because so many of the main line protestant churches have lost their minds and re-written themselves into to mega-liberal social club, embarrassed of the Gospel of Jesus Christ. Consequently the Anglican Communion has become an attractive shelter, in spite of the lunacy going on in The Episcopal Church. This attractiveness is due to the historical connection with the Early Church and the fact that the “Reform Catholic” position is both orthodox and conservative, with respect to the faith. The breadth of Anglicanism embraces both “low church” (more protestant in nature) and ”high church” (more catholic minded) believers, although these labels are “slippery” because there are “low-church” people who like a more simple liturgy but are still more catholic in their faith and “High-church” people who like a sung and more “festive” liturgy but are more protestant in their theology. The point is, many more “protestant” minded folk tend to see the Thirty-Nine Articles as a “definitive” statement of faith, BUT THEY ARE NOT, NEVER WERE, NEVER WILL BE.
Nevertheless, many books are currently being written, by newcomers from the Canterbury Trail to try to legitimatize this view of the Articles as “definitive”. Don’t be misled, the position is intellectually dishonest.
Beware of any book by any author that seeks to raise the status of the Thirty-Nine Articles beyond that of "Historical Document" because Anglicanism has NEVER HAD AN OFFICIAL STATEMENT OF FAITH. In stead, it relies upon the rule "lex orandi lex credendi", meaning "that which is prayed is that which is believed" which is why the BCP is so important and is the soul and "glue" and definition of Anglicanism.
Reformation Protestants may find a home in Anglicanism when their own house burns down or doesn’t fit anymore, but that doesn’t make Anglicanism “Protestant”. It is not.
Some refer to Anglicanism as the “Via Media”, a “middle way" between Catholic and Protestant positions. But this not accurate. The “Via Media” of Anglicanism is its own position, arrived at through the authority of Scripture (as interpreted by the Church), Tradition (of the undivided Church, represented by the first seven Ecumenical Councils) and Reason (the Candle of The Lord, as a function of being created in the Image of God). The Anglican Ethos is “Reform Catholic” and includes element that may be found within Protestantism and Catholicism, but not as a result of compromise, though making harmonization of the two positions possible. That is the Anglican Ethos. I hope you find this ton of words helpful.


Kevin, I wrote more than I think you have seen. I am very confused on how to use this site, which is why I sort of droped out for a while; But I noticed you wanted to read more about Anglicanism. I listed five books from a seminary course that are excellent and not "confused" on their notion about the nature of Anglicanism, like so many available books on the subject are. I only send this second comment because I see that your "thank you" comment was sent before I posted the final version of my initial comment to you so I don't know if you saw the book titles and final remarks.

I wonder if goodreads cuts off our posts if they are over a certain length? try typing shorter sections in the comments, then post and wait a minute and type a new comment. Perhaps that might work? Greg, don't give up on goodreads. It can be so much fun, and in this group we have wonderful kindred spirits. ☺ ( that is my little smiling face. He is such a little guy)
Blessings,
Karen

Thanks Skylar, & Charity for responding so quick to doing some summer reads in the group. I'm going to read "Surprised by Hope..." and then I'd love to read The recent Chesterton that Skylar just finished reading. He is so deep, but I always have questions and things I want to discuss when I read Chesterton. Then after that I want to read the other NT.Wright, "Why Christian Character Matters..." I know Kevin will hopefully jump into any of the N.T. Wright discussions.
You know, there are no rules about how many discussions we can have going at the same time! Lol! If you are reading something and you want to have group members thoughts on it, feel free to start a thread (discussion) on that book.
Happy Friday. Have a blessed weekend :)
-Karen

For once I lingered on GoodReads & found some neat photos of churches. Love'um, love'um!
I feel kind of pulled-I have a commitment to read for church small group, my "own" book (Sayers) and then I am going to do the Summer Assignment. I'd like to hear about the other books, read reviews, even if I can't read parallel to it. (BTW, my background parallels yours-RC pre-Vatican 2, etc)

Don't worry about being able to join any of our book discussions on schedule. No book discussion in our group is closed, so when your committments lighten up, you can jump into any discussion that interests you, even a very old discussion of the past. Cool that our backgrounds are similar. I love getting to know fellow Anglican or those interested in the Anglican church on goodreads and in this group. It is so fun. It makes the world not seem so big :)
Did you have to wear those cute lace head coverings as a Roman Catholic child? Actually I kind of liked wearing them. I named them "Holy Doilies." LOL!

I'm leaving for a family camping holiday on July the 7th, and probably another one shortly after, but I will be reading, checking the group book discussion and posting here and there as I am in town.
Hope you all have lovely holidays and get refreshed both physically and spiritually this summer of 2010. May and June were too busy for me. July is going to be my rest and refreshment month!
Blessings,
Karen

The Man Who Is Thursday
Any body else like Chesterton?

The Abolition of Britain

Going back to an early post on this thread, I very much enjoyed Called Out of Darkness. I understand Anne Rice has "broken" with "Christianity," however, and has announced not that she does not believe in and wish to follow Christ, but that she no longer considers herself a "Christian". Whatever that means, exactly. But I found much in her spiritual autobiography to be moving and sincere.

About Ann Rice saying she is not a Christian any more. I don't quite get what she means either. I enjoyed " Called Out of Darkness: A Spiritual Confession"However at the end of the book, I remember her bringing up some things such as women's ordination to the priesthood, and homosexuality not being a sin. I was wondering if her doubts in those areas would trip her up in her faith? She has a gay son. I wonder if that has made being a Catholic difficult for her?
Kevin,
I just added this to our group, "to read list" :Evangelicals on the Canterbury Trail: Why Evangelicals Are Attracted to the Liturgical Church Do you own a copy of it? My local library doesn't have it. I may check out our church library and see if they have it.

I think after Thanksgiving I'll post a discussion titled "Advent 2010," where we can either chose a book to go through together and discuss, or share our own thoughts on our own individual advent books we read.
This group as most goodreads groups are very relaxed and jump in as you can, without feeling obligated. It is all about books, fun and good Christian fellowship.

"Paul and I are going to be reading "Told By An Idiot" by Rose Macauley. We read her "The Towers of Trebizond" a while ago. She is a very interesting Anglican, having left the church for most of her adult life, coming back to it in her later years."
I looked this author up and she sounds interesting. I might read, The Towers of Trebizond first, then if I like that, I'm thinking of trying Told by an Idiot
The Towers of Trebizond
Told By An Idiot
here is a bit about the author, Rose Macaulay:
Rose Macaulay
It would be fun to discuss a book as a group. I get so much more out of books this way.

I also heard from Cookie Sue in our group:
"We are reading and listening to C.S. Lewis' Mere Christianity (in our S.S. Class).
I tried it a few years ago and couldn't get into it, but, seems to go down better this time.
Anyone interested in this as a group read?"
I've read Mere Christianity and enjoyed it. I would definitely grab my copy off the family book shelf add my thoughts on several of the chapters.


Enjoy your book!
For others, here's a link to the book
The Wisdom of Stability

I don't have any other Lewis ideas. But notice I keep going back to the reader (Business of Heaven) & "God in the Dock" when it comes to Lewis.

Summer can't come soon enough for me!

Brave New World

Yes, I abstain. I LOVE gadgetry/technology but it feeds a beast within and wastes my precious time: my new Kindle has me buying more than I read. I put it in a drawer & it is awaiting my trip. My husband travels alone and never uses a smartphone & has for 20 years regularly disconnected his TV when he enters a hotel room. He can masterhis own domain.

While I definitely see the dangers of technology (I got rid of a smart phone because I felt it disconnected me) I'm not sure about this nature/technology dichotomy.
The reason for this is that, on the one hand, there is a sense in which the organic world is not at all natural. The organic world of today is a fallen world, were death reigns, disasters strike and the strong survive. That world is, God has promised us, going to be remade, but it isn't yet.
On the other hand, technology likewise is natural in a sense. It reflects our creative capacity, part of what we are as creatures made in the image of God.
That said, technology can give us a greater sense of control over our lives, and this in turn can feed into that old sin of pride. Technology can also at times be used without wisdom, as we move forward without ever asking ourselves "should we move forward" and in so doing we loose control.
(p.s. sorry for my disappearance. School got hectic)

Books mentioned in this topic
The Chosen (other topics)Brave New World (other topics)
Told by an Idiot (other topics)
The Towers of Trebizond (other topics)
Mere Christianity (other topics)
More...
Authors mentioned in this topic
Chaim Potok (other topics)Rose Macaulay (other topics)
Here is a thread where the group can just converse about whatever is on our minds, that we are itching to talk about!