TWILIGHT HATERS discussion
Twilight: Characters of Shame
>
Oh, Twilight.
date
newest »
newest »
If guys started acting like Edward most girls wouldn't like them. Example conversation: Boy: "I'm gonna act like Edward from now on." Girl: "You're the best!!" Later that night: Girl: "Why the hell are you in my room?!" Boy: "I'm acting like Edward my love." Girl: "Get the f*** out of my room, you stalker!!". And the constant disgusted look stare, the controlling of who she sees etc. The relationship would end up badly, and alot of girls would have restriction forms against the guys...sad day...sad day...
When I read the book I couldnt help but think Edward was going to turn abusive. He has a major jealousy problem and seems to enjoy telling Bella exactly what to do. But then again, Bella is the perfect example of a girl who looks as if she's in an abusive relationship.
Well, she is submissive, and doesn't even talk to Edward about it, she never has to make a real choice in the books at all. The only choice was to become a vampire, and even then that was not really a choice, it was done when she was unconscious and dying. She deserves it anyways, since she has such a bad self-esteem when multiple guys like her and the whole school is enthralled with her.
That really bugged me. Any girl that would have that many boys chasing them would definetly LOVE it.
And if were going into the whole series; i had a problem with the whole jacob and edward thing. If you were a girl and a werewolf and a vamp was in love with you, wouldn't you go running the other way trying to save your life? I hate to be the person to overanalyze it, but i dont think the book was very.....realistic (that was a horrible word to use). What i mean is the choices in the books would be easy ones, not something to write a 600 page book over. Does that make sense?
And if were going into the whole series; i had a problem with the whole jacob and edward thing. If you were a girl and a werewolf and a vamp was in love with you, wouldn't you go running the other way trying to save your life? I hate to be the person to overanalyze it, but i dont think the book was very.....realistic (that was a horrible word to use). What i mean is the choices in the books would be easy ones, not something to write a 600 page book over. Does that make sense?
And yes, I do think that I would probably go the other way. When Edward left I would have been like "OMG!! He didn't eat me!!" not get all suicidal.
Maybe its just me being too critical...
If a vampire stood within 10 feet of me I would curl up into the fetal position
Shope116 wrote: "If a vampire stood within 10 feet of me I would curl up into the fetal position"But, he sparkles!!! *DaZZlE* lol. Yeah, I would run away and get a cross stake with garlic on it...wait, I forgot, SM f***ed up the vampires none of that applies. Hes just too strong to be repelled, nothing can stop him, he's the "ultimate predator"...retarded...X(
I just literally laughed out loud. You are SOOOO right. I'm kind of upset that she made vampires invinceable (pardon my spelling), i mean if we can only kill them with fire then were all screwed, right? The last time i checked you cant carry fire in your pocket.
Shope116 wrote: "...The last time i checked you cant carry fire in your pocket."Haha. That was really dumb, I mean after you rip them to pieces(even though their skin is hard as granite, yet they can still move) you still have to burn them or they can still come back somehow. WTF!? So, if you hide their head in the pyramids, and their legs in the deepest part of the ocean and scatter the rest of the pieces around(or even make a pie out of them and feed it to you're dog*teehee*) they can still come back! How the hell are all of the pieces going to get back together?


lets try to keep it clean:)