Science Fiction Aficionados discussion

This topic is about
Matter
Series Read: The Culture
>
Book 8: Matter
date
newest »

message 1:
by
mark, personal space invader
(new)
-
rated it 3 stars
Dec 02, 2015 12:08AM

reply
|
flag
I'm sure this book will be great because I'm sure every book Banks writes has some amount of greatness to it. unfortunately I probably won't be getting to it until 2016 and will check back in then.

i dont have this one, but I should finish Look to windward today, so I am going to stop at the library and see if they have it



His continuous searching: Is it right to intervene? And, Is violence necessary? In this book, an easy yes.

I don’t know if it’s a trend in modern British SF or if I’ve just hit upon a run of similar novels, but Iain M. Banks’s Matter is just one in a string of SF novels I’ve read lately that explore low tech societies set within a broader high tech universe. Peter F. Hamilton’s Void Trilogy was another, as was Alastair Reynolds’s Terminal World.
In Matter, Banks gives us a plausible explanation why the Sarl (the lower tech society) exists, and then uses that society and its connections to the broader galactic political structure as a lever to pry open parts of his Culture universe that he had not explored in detail before. In particular, Shellworlds, which are classic Big Dumb Objects, populated by a variety of intergalactic species, each claiming one or more layers of the Shellworld.
It's a big complex book that explores not only the low tech Sarl, but also the various political and technological hierarchies that administer the Shellworld, and of course contains plenty of Special Circumstances machinations for you Culture fanatics.
I also read this one back a while ago. This was my first Ian Banks novel, so I'm unfamiliar with the series, but I plan to correct that, as I loved this one. I have a copy of Use of Weapons (paperback) on my "to read" shelves. I personally enjoy complexity in a an SF novel, if the author take cares to explain it clearly and concisely, and Banks certainly managed the clearly part. Concisely? Well, the book Is a tad long. But his conceptual framework, IMO, was worth it. It's one of the few books that I'm keeping to read again.