Flights of Fantasy discussion
This topic is about
Harry Potter and the Cursed Child
Archived Group Reads
>
September 2016 - YA/MG: Harry Potter and the Cursed Child by J.K. Rowling, et al
date
newest »
newest »
message 2:
by
colleen the convivial curmudgeon, Not a book hipster!
(last edited Aug 19, 2016 08:20AM)
(new)
-
rated it 1 star
Copied from Reading thread:Aug 18, 2016 06:49AM
I started Harry Potter and the Cursed Child - Parts One and Two this morning.
About 50 pages in: (view spoiler)
***
Aug 18, 2016 08:07AM
I sort of agree, Jackie. But (view spoiler)
***
Aug 19, 2016
Also, what is up with (view spoiler)
From Reading Thread in response to Colleen's comments:August 18th:
Regarding your spoiler:
(view spoiler)
*******
August 19th
Anyway, (view spoiler)
So. I'm not reading this one but I read a couple of interesting reviews of it on a feminist fiction blog I follow: (There will be spoilers here, btw)
Harry Potter and the Cursed Child NEEDS a simulcast
http://feministfiction.com/2016/07/25...
Harry Potter and the Cursed Child Review
http://feministfiction.com/2016/08/01...
I skimmed those, because I didn't want to read too many spoilers...But, like, I can get how this would be an amazing piece of stagecraft. The descriptions of the scene changes and visuals and magic and stuff - as an actor, I can just imagine what's involved and how cool it would look.
And I'm often more forgiving of movies and shows than I am of books. Maybe it's because when you read and when you watch something, I think you use different parts of your brain. (I'm pretty sure I read that somewhere once.)
And if this was just a regular story, then that'd be cool.
But as a piece of Harry Potter canon?
There are just some things that are so fan-fictiony...
I mean... I hate to say it... but I might be 1-starring this bad boy.
Me. 1-starring anything Harry Potter related.
I mean.
Fuck.
(Hell, I might have to go 2-stars just to save my sanity.)
lolI feel you. I've read some great plays that don't really stand as printed works.
But I'm sad you aren't enjoying your read. Time for a palate cleanser.
MrsJoseph wrote: "lolI feel you. I've read some great plays that don't really stand as printed works."
I know we discussed this a little bit before... You had mentioned some people were saying that plays aren't meant to be read, and I actually agree with that. It's one reason I was a bit hesitant to read this, because plays aren't meant to be read, they're meant to be experienced... and reading it is just never going to be the same thing.
Reading Shakespeare sucks (I think). But seeing a good performance? Totally different thing.
I do appreciate the stage notes, though, because it does help me visualize the scene - at least somewhat. I was worried it was going to be pure dialogue. o_O
colleen the fabulous fabulaphile wrote: "I skimmed those, because I didn't want to read too many spoilers...But, like, I can get how this would be an amazing piece of stagecraft. The descriptions of the scene changes and visuals and mag..."
I went with two stars because I was still processing when I rated it and I was shocked at how I felt about it. But, honestly, the more I think about it the more I feel like it deserves one star.
I get your point about seeing v.s reading a play and that was part of my struggle with it too. However, I had issues with the plot itself and I think if I see the play I would still have problems with it. I won't go into it because you haven't finished, but I do look forward to see what you think of it once you're done.
Jackie wrote: "However, I had issues with the plot itself and I think if I see the play I would still have problems with it. "Oh, yeah. There are issues, no doubt about that. I just think people are less focused on that when seeing it instead of reading it.
And done.So, um... How in the actual fuck was (view spoiler)
Seriously, what blackmail must they have on Rowling to get her seal of approval on this as canon?
Whatevs. I refuse to accept it as canon. And you can't make me. So there.
colleen the fabulous fabulaphile wrote: "And done.So, um... How in the actual fuck was [spoilers removed]
Seriously, what blackmail must they have on Rowling to get her seal of approval on this as canon?
Whatevs. I refuse to accept it..."
And BOOOOM....the huge issue I had with the plot.
Doesn't make any effin' sense! I can't accept that Rowling endorsed this and I don't accept it as the 8th. She should've left the story as is and just focus on Pottermore stuff or a new series.
How about i can't even begin to accept that (view spoiler)And speaking of "Canon? What canon?", how about when Albus is like (view spoiler)
colleen the fabulous fabulaphile wrote: "How about i can't even begin to accept that [spoilers removed]And speaking of "Canon? What canon?", how about when Albus is like [spoilers removed]
(view spoiler)
Here's some other inconsistencies that I was reading in someone else's thread:(view spoiler)
As to family: (view spoiler)
Jer said, upon finishing this, that it read like it was written by someone who watched the movies (but was playing on their phones and so missed important stuff) but hadn't read the books.I recalled having the same thought (view spoiler)
colleen the fabulous fabulaphile wrote: "Jer said, upon finishing this, that it read like it was written by someone who watched the movies (but was playing on their phones and so missed important stuff) but hadn't read the books.I recal..."
Ha! That's actually a pretty damn good description. I think that's why if I were to see the play I would still be disappointed. I get that each medium is it's own entity, but the rules of the world should still apply no matter what.
colleen the fabulous fabulaphile wrote: "Oh, yeah. There are issues, no doubt about that. I just think people are less focused on that when seeing it instead of reading it.."Us Aristolean purists hold by the master, and that a play that depends on spectacle to pull it off is a bad play.
colleen the fabulous fabulaphile wrote: "How about i can't even begin to accept that [spoilers removed]"
I could accept that. IF -- some reason were provided. There is nothing Voldemort would not do if there were sufficient in it for him. But there would have to be sufficient, and I can imagine a dozen reasons, each worse than the last (view spoiler) -- but there would have to be some reason.
The other possibility is that she was lied to, that (view spoiler) but that would need at least to be hinted at.
Also, what on earth were Albus and Scorpius doing in Slytherin? Both of them seemed to me to be Hufflepuff to the core.
colleen the fabulous fabulaphile wrote: "I can sort of buy Albus [spoilers removed]"yes, there's an element of that. Also, there's the element that while Harry let the problems come to him, Albus proactively set out to fix one -- ambitious there.
But the fundamental problem is -- and here comes one of my favorite rants -- that the Houses just aren't well world-built. The House Evil trope can work in comic children's tales (I recommend Castle Hangnail as an excellent example of it) but it doesn't really work in serious discussion of good and evil. Seguing between the two tropes would require an absolute genius. Especially given that it would have to be slithered into the gaps in the story. But "ambition" could be shifted slightly to "dedication" or "zeal" or even "self-mastery" -- like the Olympic theory of striving for the highest, which would also expose the wizards to the temptations of evil.
I'm only halfway through, so I've only read half this thread so far, but here are my thoughts.I don't mind the format as much as I worried I would. I haven't had any issues with turning the stage notes and dialogue into a little play in my head. Do I wish it were written in a traditional format? Sure. Does the play format ruin it though? Not at all.
Albus - complete agreement. (view spoiler)
Draco / Harry - agree here as well. (view spoiler)
As for the inconsistencies... They are driving me nuts as well. The floo thing just seems lazy, and (view spoiler)
Other than that.. I am interested in seeing where the whole (view spoiler). I'm a little worried though, as it seems like the second half of comments in this thread aren't very positive. Right now I'm at about 3 stars. We'll see where it goes from there!
Finished. 1 star. It just wasn't very good, overall it felt like subpar fanfic. I especially hated (view spoiler)
I started reading this on Friday. I haven't read the conversation here so as not to come across any spoilers. Here was my initial reaction (taken from the Harry Potter thread):
Not realizing that there were going to be multiple editions, I just purchased Harry Potter and the Cursed Child, Parts 1 & 2, the Special Rehearsal Edition Script, a few days ago. I started reading it yesterday and am now about a third or so of the way into Part 1- Act 2.
I have to admit that it is currently depressing the hell out of me. Young Potter is getting on my nerves, and I can't believe Hermione was duped by something with which she should be more than familiar.
The story certainly does have my attention; I just have to read it in small doses.
Shortly after that, I decided to put the book on the back burner; 100 pages was enough.
Albus gets on my last nerve! Harry seems like shell of his former self, as does Hermione, and Ron seems to be just completely clueless. Its practically soul sucking!
I am currently reading the 3 short story collections, originally posted at Pottermore, that are now available via Amazon. They are so much better than this, and have helped to lift my spirits.
I'm hoping that I can make myself finish the play over Christmas break, just to say that I did, at the very least. My biggest hope, however, is that the story gets better.
What do you mean by multiple editions? I thought it was the Special Rehearsal and Kindle editions, which are actually the same thing in different format from my understanding. Anyway, I don't think it matters which one you read...the material is the same and it's all bad. :P
My understanding is that there are or were plans for a definitive version, as opposed to the rehearsal version. I do not know if that is still the case.
Started this last night because it was looking at me from the table beside my reading chair. I picked this to read back in September, and then never got to join in. Liking it so far, and got through Act 1.
I love the honesty of your review. I'm glad you were able to enjoy the story.Maybe I picked it up at the wrong time for me, but I do plan to give it another go at another time. I'm just not sure when.
I feel myself gearing up to finally reread the Potter series, but I want to hold off until GR gets its act together in that respect.
I also want to make sure that I give all of the books the attention they deserve. It really is one of my favorite series.
Thanks, Nyssa. It might have actually helped me that it's been a few years since my last reading of the main series. If they had been more fresh in my mind, I might have been more critical of this.
Yep. I was right. I went back and read all the spoiler comments. I missed a lot of those inconsistencies because it's been awhile.
Chris wrote: "Thanks, Nyssa. It might have actually helped me that it's been a few years since my last reading of the main series. If they had been more fresh in my mind, I might have been more critical of this."I haven't read the series since my first time through when they were originally released. I'm sure I've forgotten a lot, but there were just some things that stayed with me.
Books mentioned in this topic
Harry Potter and the Cursed Child, Parts 1 & 2 (other topics)Castle Hangnail (other topics)
Harry Potter and the Cursed Child: Parts One and Two (other topics)
Harry Potter and the Cursed Child: Parts One and Two (other topics)


Disclaimer: My birthday is actually in October, but Becky and I switched months so she could pick a horror for Halloween.
Please remember to mark any spoilers by using the spoiler tag -- type < spoiler> your spoiler here < /spoiler>, without the spaces. Posts containing unmarked spoilers may be deleted.
I'm putting this thread up a little early since we have several members that have already been reading and discussing.