Into the Forest discussion
Film/TV /Radio Adaptations
>
Cinderella (2015)
date
newest »
newest »
I'm excited, there is a great cast (many from Downton Abbey), and I have enjoyed many of Branagh's productions.
The trailer looked a little too much like the animated version for me, but I didn't realize Branagh was directing it. I've enjoyed some of his stuff, so I'll probably give it a watch once it's on video.
I saw this Saturday with my daughter. I quite liked it! My local movie theater was showing it. Tickets there for adults are $5, so I like to go when there's a movie I might like.
My daughter and I went to see it on Sunday, March 15th. Surprisingly, I liked this new version a lot, yet Ever After remains my favorite live action retelling/ reimagining.Cinderella (2015) does follow Disney's animated film rather closely; however, notable differences include:
(view spoiler)
I'm sure there are many other differences but I've only watched it once :)
I will say that my favorite was the opening scene of the house. That coupled with the voice over narration felt like pure fairy tale to me. I also quite enjoyed Lucifer lol.
Thanks for that feedback. I'd been wondering if I should wait too, for it to show up on TV. Still haven't decided. Agree with Leah, Ever After is my absolute favorite version of this story.
I think I'll end up waiting to watch it, but I'm glad to see some good reviews of it here. My favorite Cinderella is also Ever After!
I read this wonderful article on npr about Cinderella the other day. It's long, but well worth reading: http://www.npr.org/blogs/monkeysee/20...
I read this wonderful article on npr about Cinderella the other day. It's long, but well worth reading: http://www.npr.org/blogs/monkeysee/20...
Margaret wrote: "I read this wonderful article on npr about Cinderella the othe..."Good article, Margaret.
This was my favorite line:
"...love will be durable enough to survive her reversion to her real identity"
And they ended with a fascinating conclusion.
Margaret wrote: "I read this wonderful article on npr about Cinderella the other day. It's long, but well worth reading:.."Terrific article. Thank you for sharing, Margaret!
You're welcome! I would love to see some of the versions she discussed at the beginning made into movies.
We saw this last weekend and I loved it. Of course Kenneth Branagh so I expected Good Stuff, and he totally delivered. Most of all I liked that he didn't try to turn it into someone else's story (e.g. a misunderstood stepmom or an AU evil Cinderella). He went with the core of the fairy tale. He said that in an interview -- that he wanted to show that kindness and courage and honesty weren't just passive ways of finding comfort until you eventually get a reward, but rather active strengths in their own right. He takes the story seriously (as you'd expect from a Shakespearean) and gives it a beautiful depth without being saccharine or sentimental.I loved that both the main characters had strong ties with their parents -- the part with the prince and his father was particularly moving. And the ethnic mix of the court, as others mentioned, was also very cool. Yay for the big captain of the guards who foils the scheming count!!
There's a great interview with Branagh here, all about the movie -- casting, screenplay, etc.
Jen ƸӜƷ wrote: "Is the retelling closer to the original Cinderella or more similar to Disney's retelling?"Depends on what you mean by "the original" :) For example, it's very close to Charles Perrault, but then so was Disney. It does have Disney's cat Lucifer and the little mouse friends, including Gus-Gus (my favorite).
It doesn't include Grimm's embellishment about the sisters cutting off their toes, thank goodness (hope that's not a spoiler lol)
Yes, I was meaning some of the more ghoulish elements of Cinderella. And, not a spoiler, just curious.
Jen ƸӜƷ wrote: "Yes, I was meaning some of the more ghoulish elements of Cinderella. And, not a spoiler, just curious."Ah, ok. No, it's not remotely ghoulish -- quite the contrary.
Interesting article in response to claims that this adaptation is anti-feministhttp://feministfiction.com/2015/04/08...
Leah wrote: "Interesting article in response to claims that this adaptation is anti-feministhttp://feministfiction.com/2015/04/08..."
Great article! I love this:
What absolute rubbish. Once again, the idea of “feminist media” has been twisted around, so that anything short of sassy female characters dishing out one-liners and kicking butt is seen as “weak” and “anti-feminist.”...The idea that anyone with sense and self-respect would fight back is insidious, and it does not match up with reality, not even in a modern, non-fairy tale setting.
Great article. I've read a few articles in the last week discussing this same issue--the last one I read was about Game of Thrones. I'm definitely glad to see this issue being brought up so much!
Michele wrote: "Leah wrote: "Interesting article in response to claims that this adaptation is anti-feminist
http://feministfiction.com/2015/04/08..."
Great article! I love thi..."
Excellent article. I agree with the part you quoted. I am so sick of the notion that if a female character doesnt "kick ass" and have a black belt in martial arts they're considered weak.
http://feministfiction.com/2015/04/08..."
Great article! I love thi..."
Excellent article. I agree with the part you quoted. I am so sick of the notion that if a female character doesnt "kick ass" and have a black belt in martial arts they're considered weak.
Not to quibble, but the author of the piece Leah found says this Cinderella is feminist, but rather than butt- kicking she is kind. I believe that people and fictional characters can be feminists and kind.
Leah wrote: "Interesting article in response to claims that this adaptation is anti-feministhttp://feministfiction.com/2015/04/08..."
I agree with the article. In fact, I think the whole argument feminists make about Cinderella being a "doormat" is pretty bogus (and I've earned my feminist creds by spending half of my career working in feminist media.) The whole argument essentially resorts to "blaming the victim," which feminists will be the *first* to decry in any other abuse situation. I wrote about this issue in my post about Disney's animated, 1950 version of Cinderella, but think it applies to any traditional portrayal of Cinderella that bypasses the idea that she should be either "sassy" or "cursed" to explain her "compliance" in her abuse: https://ayearindisneymovies.wordpress...
Julia wrote: "Not to quibble, but the author of the piece Leah found says this Cinderella is feminist, but rather than butt- kicking she is kind. I believe that people and fictional characters can be feminists a..."
Of course!
Of course!
Julia wrote: "Not to quibble, but the author of the piece Leah found says this Cinderella is feminist, but rather than butt-kicking she is kind. I believe that people and fictional characters can be feminists and kind."Yes indeed :) I think that is precisely the point that the author of this article is making, too.





I think there've been modern adaptations since then too, but those don't count, IMO.
There was Ever After- but there wasn't any magic at all in that one.
So it's probably been a couple of decades since the last straight retelling that actually followed the Cinderella story.