You'll love this one...!! A book club & more discussion
Group Themed Reads: Discussions
>
January 2017 - Moon Theme
date
newest »


I read Moon Called a year ago. I will need to read it again when I'm ready to continue the series, but I have other series I want to tackle first.
I'm not interested all that much in children's literature so will pass on the other selection.
I acquired Flame Moon as a freebie Kindle ebook back in July 2013, so it's time to get it off my tbr.




I can't imagine what it would be like to awaken and not be able to remember even your name. There have been occasions when I've waken and not been able to figure out what day it was. That was disconcerting enough, but I still had the sense of knowing who I was and where I was. I think I would be highly agitated. The MC doesn't seem to be overly concerned.
I shall keep reading to see where it goes. From the shelves, I think it's paranormal romance. This was a freebie, so I don't have a lot of high hopes for it. At least it's an easy read.




They've left the bedroom for the time being to engage in a bit of murder and mayhem. It was a bit better but there are still some plot flaws. (view spoiler)

It's a stretch, but one could ferret out the themes of prejudice. The elders discounted the value of a person who was a half-breed, and would prefer immediate death to allowing them to dilute the line. There was the refusal to acknowledge that both sides display good and evil equally. I suspect the tale was told primarily as a romance with an attempt to make it a bit different from the usual fare.




Good plan. I won't be reading the rest of the trilogy.




It is a wonderful series about vampires, werewolves and werebears, witches and humans. Every chapter is told from one of the main characters. Probably the main-main character is Emma, a human girl with soulsight - she can see people's souls. She has visions of her former lives. So some chapters are told from the view point of Cassandra (Emma's former self from around 1800), a vampire who has an eternal bond with another vampire, called Julian. Emma tries to find out more about Cassandra and Julian. In part 2 we meet Hanna, another of Emma's former selves, from around 1500. And in part 3 we meet Larkin, Emma's future self from 2088.
In all those lives Emma recognizes Tom (Cassandra's first husband) by his soul. In Emma's life (the present day) he is called Stefan, a werewolf and one of the other narrators.
I really like all the different characters (not too many so you can't keep up with who is who) and the "Emma's" from other times. I'm really fascinated by reincarnation, so this is a really interesting series for me!
I gave part 1 and 2 5 stars each and I'll probably reward part 3 with 5 as well!
For anyone who wants to give it a try: part 1 and several short stories are free on Kobo (and maybe other retailers as well?)!


I'm not sure I know of a series it can be compared to. Maybe a bit with the Vampire Academy from Richelle Mead, even though there is no significant school in the story (Emma gets kicked out of college the first day she is there, because she recognizes the soul of the college professor and kicks him!).

I've never read Vampire Academy nor have I watched the tv series. Maybe one day....

I recently saw this movie for 4th time over 35 year time span. First watch left me very confused. Finally, I do have the feeling that I mostly get it. This watch I also appreciated more than before the artificial intelligence component.
A bonus this time was that the film was accompanied by live orchestra (San Francisco Orchestra) for the musical parts. Very cool!
However, I've not once read the Arthur C. Clarke, and it's definitely calling to me. Especially with 2017 annual challenge since I need to read a book set in space.
(Note to self - Raises interesting question about annual challenge for another task to read a book set in the future. When this book was written, it was set in the future, but it's now set in the past. So could this book, or another with similar timeline, count as a book "set in the future" or not. Hmmm.)


But it was a well written book and I enjoyed it.

Oh, and I admit that I never understood the movie ending. I have watched the movie numerous times over the years. I always intended to read the book, but Clark is so dry, I never got to it.

Please let me know what you thing, Janice! I hope you like it as well as I did!

Though it seems like a valid point, that it was set in the future when it was written, it just feels like it's not quite in the spirit of the task. I'll probably opt for a book that is set in the future we have yet to see : )


It took me a while to wrap my arms around what i was reading because it's an unusual format, which is described as a "bio-novel." The book's narrative story is fictional, constructed by the author, Rochelle Lynn Holt, for the purpose of providing a dramatic framework for the authentic letters and poems of the author's spiritual "twin sister," Virginia Love Long.
I didn't realize this right away, and it took me some time to get it sorted out about what I was reading. So that was distracting actually. That said, the epistolary portions of the book were what I really liked most. The fictional story was interesting enough but rather sad, and I didn't think it felt true-to-life. So the overall effect was a strange clash between nonfiction and fiction. I wound up being glad to have read it. I seem to be the lone reader and rater of this quirky book.


The moon for many belongs to a sort of mystical realm. What is the moon but a kind of illusion? When we "see" the moon, we are actually seeing sunlight reflected off the surface of the moon. The reflection is not actually the moon itself though.
Zen buddhism has a teaching about the teacher pointing to the moon. The student who fixes their eyes on the teacher's finger misses what the teacher is actually trying to show. So writings and teachings may been seen as so many fingers pointing to the moon. They are not the deeper meaning itself.
I think the author of this book is suggesting that her "twin's" writing was of this nature. That it draws the readers attention to something greater, something deeper. Okay, that's enough on that!

I don't think you can understand the ending without watching / reading the next in the series - 2010: Odyssey Two, which is a continuation and helps make sense of 2001. I would definitely recommend watching it, you're missing out otherwise.
Some of the threads aren't tied up until 2061: Odyssey Three and 3001: The Final Odyssey... I feel a re-read coming on ; )
Books mentioned in this topic
2061: Odyssey Three (other topics)3001: The Final Odyssey (other topics)
2010: Odyssey Two (other topics)
Pointing to the Moon: A Biographical Epistolary Novel (other topics)
Pointing to the Moon: A Biographical Epistolary Novel (other topics)
More...
Authors mentioned in this topic
Nora Roberts (other topics)Richelle Mead (other topics)
Shay Roberts (other topics)
Arthur C. Clarke (other topics)
To clarify, books could be set in the moon, a moon play an important part in the story, is the author's surname, is in the book or series title, or perhaps there is a moon on the front cover. Lot's of options with this one.
Please discuss your book in this thread.
In order to receive a badge you must:
1. have completed the book before or during January 2017
2. discussed it in this thread. Discussion must be more than "I read the book and I liked it". Discussion requires something more substantial and analytical of what you read, for example, thoughts, opinions, impact it had on you, what was your favourite part, was it what you expected it to be like etc. You may also like to review the book and post a link to the review in this thread.
3. Report that you have read AND discussed the book in the reporting thread (including a brief summary of what you thought of the book).
General Rules:
1. Please mark your spoilers with the spoiler tags along with mentioning what stage of the book you are at so other's don't get a nasty shock.