Essays discussion

Dasein paradigmatically understands being as time
Source: Rethinking Difference, Daniel Dahlstrom

What is that supposed to mean?

Dasein “triangulates” being and beings:

on the analysis given in Being and Time, the ontological difference is rooted in Dasein. Dasein, with its distinctive, existential understanding of being, triangulates being and beings.

SZ§1 “a Battle of Giants concerning Being," Plato, Sophist ... sustained the avid research of Plato and Aristotle but from then on ceased to be heard as a thematic question of actual investigation. What these two thinkers achieved has been preserved in various distorted and "camouflaged" forms down to Hegel's Logic.”

I read that as Heidegger saying “fight me, Hegel!” In a bar.

What’s his problem with Hegel?

SZ§1 “the idea that a questioning of being is not needed cannot be discussed in detail. They are rooted in ancient ontology itself.”

Ancient Ontology as in Aristotle’s ousia etc?

Or as in Meno’s Paradox: that is, either you know or you don’t know, either way, answer is impossible?