2-3-4 Challenge Book Discussions #1 discussion
This topic is about
Murder on Waverly Place
Murder on Waverly Place
>
Question G
date
newest »
newest »
message 1:
by
Jonetta
(new)
-
rated it 4 stars
Nov 19, 2018 06:48AM
Mod
reply
|
flag
Yes, this one was easy. In fact, Sarah should have suspected her as soon as she learned the money was stolen.
Yes, it was obvious that Serafina had the money. It made me very suspicious of her throughout the story. I didn't buy into her story that Mrs. Gittings made her lie to bring her customers back. Sure she lied, but I don't think Mrs. Gittings had much to do with it.
Robin, upon reflection, I’m not sure Mrs. Gittings was having to push her very hard to do much of anything. I think the only thing she did against them was to hold back their money, probably knowing they’d bolt.
I know. Mrs. Gittings was just making sure they stuck around so she could get her share of the loot.
I think the only thing that bothered her about the things that Mrs. Gittings made her say was the heavy-handedness. I bet that Serafina could have been much more subtle about getting money from their clients, conning them for years without arousing any suspicion.
I’m inclined to believe that, too, Giulia. Mrs. Gittings was just a rough con. Serafina was much more talented in that respect.




