Underground Knowledge — A discussion group discussion

Excerpt from Chapter 20 in Vaccine Science Revisited: Are Childhood Immunizations As Safe As Claimed?:


Glyphosate – it’s in everything around you

“Vaccines, I would argue, are the best, safest things we put into our body. Obviously nothing is absolutely safe.” –Dr. Paul Offit, MD. (Chief of the Division of Infectious Diseases).


It’s a fact that vaccines include contaminants. One of these contaminants (in the vaccine) can affect the glutamate functions in our brain. This would be glyphosate, the controversial active agent in RoundUp. Its use in weed-killing is how it made its way into vaccines. Animals eat food contaminated or altered by RoundUp. Parts of these animals are then used directly or indirectly in the manufacturing of vaccines.

In order to understand why glyphosate is dangerous to our body, we need to understand how it works. Glyphosate is detrimental to the Shikimate pathway. This pathway is found in plants and microorganisms such as bacteria. It’s not found in human cells. One of this pathway’s important functions is to combine aromatic compounds, such as aromatic acids and certain vitamins.

As just mentioned, human cells don’t contain the Shikimate pathway. So even though the aromatic acids are extremely important to us, our cells are not able to produce these acids. This is why the importance of getting them in our food is often stressed.

Although human cells don’t have the Shikimate pathway, our vast number of gut bacteria do. We are therefore reliant on our gut bacteria to produce these aromatic amino acids for us.

There hasn’t been a lot of research on glyphosate in direct relation to vaccines, but there have been numerous studies on its effect on the Shikimate Pathway. Several studies have found that glyphosate can cause oxidative stress. Oxidative stress, which is also caused by glutamate, if you recall, is the product left over from free radical vs. antioxidant balance.

Ideally, this balance will even out and not result in oxidative stress. Oxidative stress is when we have an overabundance of free radicals damaging our cells. What makes a free radical dangerous is the fact that it’s missing an electron, so it bounces around searching for one. In the meantime, it’s causing damage and creating even more free radicals. This type of damage disrupts the mitochondria in our cells and has been linked to cancers and many diseases.


Everybody has it

Studies show that “glyphosate is detectable in around 90% of the US population.” So why do we care that we are injected with trace amounts of it in our vaccines? It’s not like the vaccines are being digested in our gut where they can harm our bacterial environment. But keep in mind some of the chemicals in the vaccines enable them to travel freely through the gut-brain barrier and the blood-brain barrier.

Since glyphosate isn’t really a vaccine ingredient, but rather a contaminant, how does it enter vaccines in the first place? Think about what vaccine viruses are grown in. The medium often consists of some type of animal source:

“Contamination may come through bovine protein, bovine calf serum, bovine casein, egg protein and/or gelatin.”

Some vaccines contain gelatin, which is made from the bones and ligaments from farm animals such cows and pigs. And what have these animals likely been fed? Food like corn that has been treated with RoundUp. What is the active ingredient in RoundUp? Glyphosate.

When gelatin is used in vaccines, it very likely comes from animals which have been fed glyphosate-treated food. When gelatin is used in live viral vaccines, the virus can take the genetic coding from the glyphosate and incorporate it into its own genetic material. This can lead to autoimmune disease.

Another way for glyphosate to cause autoimmune disease is once it has been injected into your body, it will contaminate your proteins and make them difficult to break down. This causes your immune system to create antibodies against the proteins the glyphosate has attached itself to. Now you have created antibodies against your own proteins and you start attacking your own cells. You now have the perfect potential for autoimmune diseases.

A test was performed on “nineteen different vaccines, from five manufacturers” for the presence of glyphosate. It’s difficult to comprehend how glyphosate can even be detectable in vaccines considering the small role it plays in vaccine manufacturing. But in the Hepatitis B vaccine production process, for instance, genetically engineered yeast cells:

“[…] carry the surface antigen of the hepatitis B virus. The procedures result in a product that [. . .] could be a source of glyphosate if the yeast is grown on broths or media that utilize glyphosate-contaminated nutrient sources such as animal or plant proteins.”

Of the 19 vaccines they tested, the vaccine that had the most glyphosate was the MMR II vaccine by Merck.

Both sugar beets and cow’s milk are contaminated with glyphosate. Keep this in mind when reading the ingredients of the medium (where the germ is grown). Think of yeast, for instance. The yeast needs to be living and therefore the medium is given nutrients to keep it alive. These include nutrients such as galactose and glucose, or in simple terms, milk and sugar. The glucose being the sugar source and galactose is from the lactose in the milk.

The above paper says the MMR vaccine contained the most glyphosate, why is that?

“This vaccine uses up to 12% hydrolysed gelatin as an excipient–stabilizer; as well as foetal bovine serum albumin, human serum albumin and residual chick embryo; all of which are contaminated by glyphosate during animal production.”

Monsanto realized that glyphosate kills bacteria, so, in 2010, they patented glyphosate as an antimicrobial. The list of pathogens affected by glyphosate is very long. What needs to be considered also is the fact that bacterium that’s a pathogen in one part of the body is not necessarily a pathogen in another part of the body. Glyphosate doesn’t discriminate between the two.

The most common hospital-acquired bacteria, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, can break down glyphosate. When it breaks it down, formaldehyde is produced.


Working together

Glyphosate actually blocks your cells from absorbing glutamate, so now you’ll have a bunch of glutamate floating around in the space outside the cells. As you now know from the previous chapter, this causes excitotoxicity and oxidative stress.

As a matter of fact, it has been shown that glyphosate “damages DNA and is a driver of mutations that lead to cancer.” This statement is based on using the US government GE crop data to find connections between glyphosate and 22 diseases, including stroke, diabetes, obesity, Alzheimer’s disease (AD), autism and multiple sclerosis (MS). This study also answers the question of how on earth crops can survive glyphosate while it’s killing everything else around it.

The researchers explain how they found genes in a bacterium that tolerates glyphosate. This gene was extracted and inserted into crop genes. Then the crops and their surroundings were covered in glyphosate. The crops, weeds and whatever else may be in the targeted area absorbed the glyphosate. Everything died except the crops because they had been injected with glyphosate-tolerant gene.

Researchers from universities in Germany and Egypt collected blood and urine samples from dairy cows in Denmark. The purpose was to observe the presence of glyphosate and how it affects other markers such as those for the liver and its effect on important minerals such as manganese and zinc. The researchers visited eight separate farms in Denmark and retrieved samples from 30 cows on each farm. All the cows tested positive for glyphosate.

In their discussion, the authors comment:

“It is amazing that more papers are not published about glyphosate excretion by farm animals since there are many papers reporting the detection of glyphosate in urine of humans, mostly of farmers using this herbicide.”

Regarding the blood samples taken from the cows, the results, say the authors “point to livers, kidneys and muscles damage.” The authors continue explaining the behavior of glyphosate on nutrients:

“The glyphosate molecule grabs on to vital nutrients so they are not physiologically available. This process is called chelation and was actually the original property for which glyphosate was patented in 1964.”

The authors continue explaining that it wasn’t until a decade later, in 1974, that it was used as an herbicide on crops. The authors’ concerns regarding chelation is noticed towards the end of their paper where they explain:

“When applied to crops, glyphosate deprives them of vital minerals necessary for healthy plant function[...]. This also happens after ingestion of glyphosate in the body of animals and humans. Deficiency in trace elements like Mn, Cu, Zn, Se, Co, B, and Fe as well as macro elements like Mg, Ca, and others occur. Deficiencies of these elements in diets, alone or in combination, are known to interfere with vital enzyme systems and cause disorders and diseases.”

One year later, the authors of the above papers, together with other researchers, performed another study. This time they set out to test not just dairy cows, but also “hares, rabbits and humans.” German researchers show when glyphosate containing crops is digested, the urine will test positive for glyphosate.

Something we found interesting and even surprising, was that the “[f]armers who did not use rubber gloves had five times more glyphosate in their urine”. Sounds like what they are saying is that you don’t necessarily have to ingest (or be injected with) glyphosate to be contaminated, that it’s enough to be in contact with it and it’ll be absorbed through the skin.

In addition to testing humans for the presence of glyphosate, the authors also compared the results between those who are chronically ill with those who are healthy. The first mentioned had far more glyphosate in their urine than the latter.

This wasn’t just a concern of German scientists. In 2014, there was an analysis performed by scientists in America on the correlation between glyphosate and 22 diseases that seem to be continuously on the rise.

Although all 22 diseases were highly correlated, the diseases with the highest correlation with glyphosate were senile dementia (R=0.994), autism (R=0.989), thyroid cancers (R=0.988) and bladder cancer (R=0.981). The “R” stands for correlation coefficient and has a value of -1.0 to + 1.0. The way this works is a negative value shows a negative relationship between the factors being compared. The factors in this case are glyphosate and various diseases. If the value is 0, it means there is no relationship at all between the factors, and a positive value shows a positive relationship between the factors being compared.

So, when you look at the correlation the authors found between glyphosate and dementia (R=0.994), you can see it is very close to 1.0, which is a near perfect relationship between the two.

The authors explain that glyphosate is toxic to our liver at as low as five parts per million (ppm). Even worse is it started messing with the glands that secrete hormones into our blood at 0.5 ppm. According to EPA in 2013 the maximum residual allowed in cattle was 5 ppm, and grain and cereal had a maximum residual allowance of 30 ppm.

Another paper showed additional strong links between glyphosate and such diseases as “head and face anomalies [. . .], newborn eye disorders, newborn blood disorders, [. . .] new born skin disorders” and many more.

Excerpt (cont'd) from Chapter 20 in Vaccine Science Revisited: Are Childhood Immunizations As Safe As Claimed?:


Stranger danger

A ‘hazard assessment’ by the World Health Organization’s (WHO) International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) was released in March 2015 stating that glyphosate is “probably carcinogenic to humans.”

Hugh Grant, the Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer at Monsanto, a Fortune 500 company, assures us in their sustainability report that:

“At Monsanto, we’re committed to […] helping to take care of our planet, our people and the communities where we live and work.”
According to the Monsanto’s webpage, an article written April, 2017, states that:

“[…] regulatory agencies have reviewed all the key studies examined by IARC – and many more – and arrived at the overwhelming consensus that glyphosate poses no unreasonable risks to humans or the environment when used according to label instructions.”

Monsanto also state that: “no regulatory agency in the world considers glyphosate a carcinogen.” They also quote and link to agencies all over the world, stating that glyphosate does not pose a great risk to humans.

What if glutamate comes in contact with other chemicals, like aluminum? A study on exactly that was done in 2015. The paper explains how “Glyphosate disrupts gut bacteria”. One example being Clostridium difficile, a bacterium that causes diarrhea, is given the opportunity to grow in abundance. This bacterium releases a toxin which boosts the aluminum to actions leading to anemia. Anemia is when red blood cells are either unable to carry normal amounts of oxygen, or there aren’t enough red blood cells to carry the necessary amount of oxygen. As a result, we will suffer from hypoxia (lack of oxygen). This forces the pineal gland to make transferrin, which is an oxygen transporter on the red blood cell.

Aluminum, like so many other toxins involved in the vaccine manufacturing process, causes aluminum excitotoxicity. This can be problematic for some individuals when glyphosate attaches itself to aluminum and helps it cross over both the gut-brain barrier and the blood-brain barrier (BBB). The aluminum is no longer just causing problems in our blood stream, but also in the brain and gut.

Glyphosate also cloaks aluminum so it looks like calcium (Ca). This confuses the body in thinking glyphosate-aluminum compound is calcium. So, instead of absorbing calcium, the bones are absorbing glyphosate-aluminum compound. This can lead to the calcification of the pineal gland.

Besides making transferrin for oxygen transport, the pineal gland also produces melatonin. If we don’t receive enough melatonin during the first few weeks after birth, there’s a likelihood we’ll have delayed mental process in performing motor movements.


References for Chapter 20: Glyphosate – it’s in everything around you:

Dewick, P.M. (2001). Medicinal Natural Products: A Biosynthetic Approach (p. 121-166). England: John Wiley & Sons, ltd.
Mir, R., Jallu, S., and Singh, T.P. (2015). The shikimate pathway: Review of amino acid sequence, function and three-dimensional structures of the enzymes. Crit Rev Microbio, 41(2): 172-189.
Ahsan, N., Lee, D.G., Lee, K.W., Alam, I., Lee, S.H., Bahk, J.D., and Lee, B.H. (2008). Glyphosate-induced oxidative stress in rice leaves revealed by proteomic approach. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 46(12), 1062-1070.
Chaufan, G., Coalova, I., and Rios de Molina Mdel, C. (2014). Glyphosate Commercial Formulation Causes Cytotoxicity, Oxidative Effects, and Apoptosis on Human Cells: Differences With its Active Ingredient. Int J Toxicol, 33(1): 29-38.
Dreher, D. and Junod, A.F. (1996). Role of oxygen free radicals in cancer development. Eur J Cancer, 32A(1): 30-38.
Bankson, D.D., Kestin, M., and Rifai, N. (1993). Role of free radicals in cancer and atherosclerosis. Clin Lab Med, 13(2): 463-480.
Pham-Huy, L.A., He H., and Pham-Huy. C. (2008). Free Radicals, Antioxidants in Disease and Health. International Journal of Biomedical Science, 4(2): 89–96.
In Defence of Scientific Integrity: Examining the IARC Monograph Programme and Glyphosate Review, Committee on Science, Space, and Technology House of Representatives, 115th Cong. 15 (2018). Retrieved from https://docs.house.gov/meetings/SY/SY...
Samsel, A. and Seneff. S. (2017). Glyphosate pathways to modern diseases VI: Prions, amyloidoses and autoimmune neurological diseases. Journal of Biological Physics and Chemistry, 8-32.
Ibid.
Ibid.
Broach, J.R. (2012). Nutritional Control of Growth and Development in Yeast. Genetics, 192(1), 73–105.
Samsel, A. and Seneff. S. (2017). Glyphosate pathways to modern diseases VI: Prions, amyloidoses and autoimmune neurological diseases. Journal of Biological Physics and Chemistry, 8-32.
Abraham, W. (n.d.). Glyphosate formulations and their use for the inhibition of 5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase. Retrieved from https://patents.google.com/patent/US7...
Cattani, D., de Liz Oliveira Cavalli, V.L., Heinz Rieg, C.E., Domingues, J.T., Dal-Cim, T., Tasca, C.I., and Zamoner, A. (2014). Mechanisms underlying the neurotoxicity induced by glyphosate-based herbicide in immature rat hippocampus: Involvement of glutamate excitotoxicity. Toxicology, 320: 34-45.
Swanson, N.L., Leu, A., Abrahamson, J., and Wallet, B. (2014). Genetically engineered crops, glyphosate and the deterioration of health in the United States of America. Journal of Organic Systems, 9(2).
Samsel, A. and Seneff. S. (2017). Glyphosate pathways to modern diseases VI: Prions, amyloidoses and autoimmune neurological diseases. Journal of Biological Physics and Chemistry, 8-32.
Kruger, M., Schrödl, W., Neuhaus, J. and Shehata, A.A. (2013). Field Investigations of glyphosate in urine of danish dairy cows. Journal of Environmental and Analytical Toxicology, 3(5), 186-192.
Ibid.
Ibid.
Ibid.
Kruger, M., Schledorn, P., Schrödl, W., Hoppe, H-W., Lutz, W., and Shehata, A.A. (2014). Detection of glyphosate residues in animals and humans. Journal of Environmental and Analytical Toxicology, 4(2), 210-215.
Ibid.
N. Swanson, N.L., Leu, A.F., Abrahamson, J., and Wallet, B.C. (2014). Genetically engineered crops, glyphosate and the deterioration of health in the United States of America. Journal of Organic Systems, 9(2).
Ibid. (Table 1).
Hoy, J., Swanson, N., and Seneff, S. (2015). The High Cost of Pesticides: Human and Animal Diseases. Poult Fish Wildl Sci, 3:132.
International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). (2018, January 03). IARC Monograph on Glyphosate. Retrieved from https://www.iarc.fr/featured-news/med...
Monsanto (2017). Growing Better Together. [Sustainability report]. Retrieved from https://monsanto.com/app/uploads/2017...
Monsanto (February 12). Response to Benbrook’s Paper “Trends in Glyphosate Herbicide Use in the United States and Globally”. Retrieved from https://monsanto.pr/response-to-benbr...
https://monsanto.com/app/uploads/2017...
Mundy, W.R.., Freudenrich, T.M., and Kodavanti, P.R. (1997). Aluminum potentiates glutamate-induced calcium accumulation and ironinduced oxygen free radical formation in primary neuronal cultures. Mol. Chem. Neuropathol, 32(1-3): 41-57.
Seneff, S., Swanson, N. and Li, C. (2015). Aluminum and Glyphosate Can Synergistically Induce Pineal Gland Pathology: Connection to Gut Dysbiosis and Neurological Disease. Agricultural Sciences, 6(1): 42-70.
Tauman, R., Zisapel, N., Laudon, M., Nehama, H., and Sivan, Y. (2002). Melatonin production in infants. Pediatr Neurol, 26(5):379-382.

Excerpt from Chapter 21 in Vaccine Science Revisited: Are Childhood Immunizations As Safe As Claimed?:


Glyphosate – Golden slumber

“Sleep is the best meditation.” – Dalai Lama.


Sleep is very important to human health. Stephanie Seneff, a senior research scientist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) , explains that in order for us to get good sleep, we need “to clear cellular debris”.

In her presentation, Dr. Seneff explains how the pineal gland releases melatonin. The melatonin then enters the fluid in our brain and spinal cord. Melatonin puts us in REM sleep. Without the shikimate pathway, there is no melatonin because the shikimate pathway produces the precursor for melatonin.

Dr. Seneff continues to explain how lack of REM sleep, together with a calcified pineal gland, has been linked to Alzheimer’s disease (AD). The pineal gland makes it possible for us to clean up our cellular debris, but when it’s calcified it doesn’t function properly.

Because the pineal gland is not protected by the blood-brain barrier (BBB), it’s more vulnerable to aluminum and mercury toxicity. When aluminum accumulates inside the pineal gland, it hinders its ability to clean cellular debris.

Another example of glyphosate’s ability to block the shikimate pathway’s functions is its relationship with sulfate. Sulfate is metabolized by the shikimate pathway. When sulfate is being stored, it’s called Taurine. When women are pregnant, they release Taurine to the fetus. Taurine is also found in breast milk “and it accumulates in the neonatal brain.” If the mother doesn’t have enough Taurine to pass on to the child, it can lead to stunted growth in the child, the CNS doesn’t develop properly and the child will have low tolerance for glucose as well.

Sulfate helps take care of acetaminophen, aluminum and mercury in the body. Children with autism only have about “1/3 the normal level of free sulfate in blood stream.”

When a chemical that’s not supposed to be there enters our body, the consequences can range from not being a big deal at all to being life threatening. Most healthy individuals are able to take care of incoming toxicity and everything works out fine or at least seems to work out fine. We don’t always connect the dots to future illnesses. Then there are individuals who have some dysfunction in their biological makeup they may not even know about. These dysfunctions may not cause any harm until they’re exposed to certain elements or toxins.


Two-faced

If glyphosate is so bad for us, why do we have so many research papers saying how great it is? A paper published in 2010, states that:

“[…] glyphosate is a one in a 100-year discovery that is important for reliable global food production as penicillin is for battling disease.”

A study involving injecting rats with MSG was conducted to find out whether male and female rats reacted differently. The results indicated they did. Glutamate caused a “dysfunction” in the male rats’ “sexual behavior” more so than in the female rats. This was “mainly due to CNS damage” .

This was also observed in another study that looked into “the effects of testosterone on neuronal injury”.

The conclusion was that the difference between male and female was:

“sex differences in response to brain injury are partly due to the consequence of damaging effects of testosterone.”

Another paper argues that:

“We must be careful not to rush to label glyphosate as excessively toxic to humans because when used properly and in proper quantities it is probably no more dangerous and toxic than other effective herbicides on the market.”

The same paper points out that Samsel and Seneff’s paper on glyphosate is not a reliable study and argues it contains among other things:

“[…], disconnected correlations, and manipulation of number and conditions that create an epidemiological recipe for errors and nonvalid associations.”

The paper concludes by saying that “we must establish factual cause and effect relationships, rather than promote fear mongering, food scares, and lawsuits.” And under disclosures, the author states he has:

“[…] no conflict of interest, except as a consumer who has used this product for many years in my yard and would not like to see it banned unless glyphosate is found guilty as charged, [. . .].”

This article is full of accusatory statements and written throughout in that tone. Without dismissing the content, it’s difficult to respect the statements in such an article or even take it (the article) seriously. There’s a way to disagree with other scientists without dragging their work through the mud. At the end of the article, a sub-article is attached which has statements from both Seneff and Samsel commenting on this attack.

There seems to be much controversy regarding the safety of glyphosate, not only amongst scientists, but also higher up the ladder. The disagreements continue with IARC’s contradicting statement that glyphosate is “probably carcinogenic to humans.” , and the health risk assessment by the EPA, which was released in December 2017 stating that “glyphosate is not likely to be carcinogenic to humans.” (IARC is WHO’s International Agency for Research on Cancer).

Did the biological agent change? Did science change? How can they both be examining the same agent and reach opposite conclusions?

This is where science gets tricky and it’s easy to manipulate theories to mold a pleasing conclusion. Wordplay can be very confusing and misleading. The minority report from the Congressional hearing in February 2018, which can be watched online, explains it this way:

“According to IARC, a cancer ‘hazard’ is an agent that is capable of causing cancer under some circumstances, while a cancer ‘risk’ is an estimate of the carcinogenic effects expected from exposure to a cancer hazard.”

We have read this statement a hundred times and it’s still unclear, vague and misleading. Monsanto is not pleased with IARC’s assessment. In the Congressional hearing, Monsanto was presented with:

“hundreds of pages of internal Monsanto e-mails, memorandums, and other records that clearly show Monsanto engaged in a decades-long concerted effort to fend off any evidence suggesting potential adverse human health effects from glyphosate and more recently to undermine IARC’s findings. They ghost wrote scientific articles on glyphosate, established front groups to help amplify their anti-IARC message and scientific evidence they did not like, and they attempted to silence scientists who reached their conclusions questioning glyphosate’s safety.”

If you’re interested in Monsanto, we highly recommend listening to the entire hearing, where the Committee on Science, Space & Technology:

“[…] describes some of the tactics Monsanto has used to control the public debate about glyphosate as well as the scientific studies that have been conducted to assess its potential harm. These efforts appear aimed at corrupting and disrupting any honest, thorough and complete scientific evaluation of glyphosate and its potential adverse impact on the public’s health.”

Understanding how all these additional ingredients in the vaccine play on each other in some way, makes it easy to see how they can become magnified when combined. So, if, for instance, you’re measuring the amount of formaldehyde in the vaccine, you’re not taking into account whether the body is producing or being introduced to formaldehyde in any other way.

We also find it difficult to know which papers are legit, but we feel the research showing how glyphosate affects our cells on so many levels is worthy of notice. Although the argument is that glyphosate doesn’t affect human cells, through the research we did for this chapter it’s evident to us that our gut bacteria, which contains the shikimate pathway, is vital to many of our functions, especially its co-operation with our pineal gland.


References for Chapter 21: Glyphosate – Golden slumber:

CSAIL. (2018, January 18). Stephanie Seneff. Retrieved from https://www.csail.mit.edu/person/step...
Seneff, S. (2014, March). A Role for the Pineal Gland in Neurological Damage Following Aluminum-adjuvanted Vaccination. [Power Point presented at the International Symposium on Vaccines, Nice, France]. Retrieved from https://people.csail.mit.edu/seneff/S...
Ibid.
Ibid.
Seneff, S. (2018, March) Sulfate is the most common nutritional deficiency that you never heard of. [Power Point presentation in Toronto, Ontario Canada]. Retrieved from http://people.csail.mit.edu/seneff/20...
Ibid.
Ibid.
Powles, S.B. (2010). Gene Amplification Delivers Glyphosate-Resistant Weed Evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U.S.A, 107, 955–956.
Sun, Y.M., Hsu, H.K., Lue, S.I., and Peng, M.T. (1991). Sex-specific impairment in sexual and ingestive behaviors of monosodium glutamate-treated rats. Physiol Behav, 50(5), 873-880.
Yang, S.H., et al. (2002). Testosterone increases neurotoxicity of glutamate in vitro and ischemia-reperfusion injury in an animal model. J Appl Physiol, 92(1), 195-201.
Ibid.
Faria, M.A. (2015). Glyphosate, Neurological Diseases – and the Scientific Method. Surg Neurol Int, 6, 132.
Samsel, A. and Seneff, S. (2015). Glyphosate, Pathways to Modern Diseases III: Manganese, Neurological Diseases, and Associated Pathologies. Surg Neurol Int, 6, 45.
Faria, M.A. (2015). Glyphosate, Neurological Diseases – and the Scientific Method. Surg Neurol Int, 6, 132.
Ibid.
Ibid.
In Defence of Scientific Integrity: Examining the IARC Monograph Programme and Glyphosate Review, Committee on Science, Space, and Technology House of Representatives, 115th Cong. 15 (2018). https://docs.house.gov/meetings/SY/SY...
Ibid.
Committee on Science, Space, & Technology. (2018, February 6). Full Committee Hearing - In Defense of Scientific Integrity: Examining the IARC Monograph Programme and Glyphosate Review. Retrieved from https://science.house.gov/legislation...
In Defence of Scientific Integrity: Examining the IARC Monograph Programme and Glyphosate Review, Committee on Science, Space, and Technology House of Representatives, 115th Cong. 15 (2018). https://docs.house.gov/meetings/SY/SY...
Ibid.
Ibid.