Book Lair discussion
Book Formats
>
Paperback
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Ana
(new)
Sep 03, 2014 02:14AM

reply
|
flag

When my favorite authors publish new books I buy the hardback and haven't gone back to buying "new" paperbacks in years.

I think this is the first time I have heard someone mention that reading a real book hurts their eyes more than an e-reader. I thought any electronical device would hurt our eyes more?
I love the feel and smell of real pages and paperbacks are cheaper and easier to carry along :) But I can see myself becoming overwhelmed with E-readers.They are very practical indeed.
I love the feel and smell of real pages and paperbacks are cheaper and easier to carry along :) But I can see myself becoming overwhelmed with E-readers.They are very practical indeed.

I find my eyes are a lot more tired ever since I started reading on my smartphone. I am not sure if that's because the letters or small or because it is an electronical device. I never had this problem with paperbacks... So I wonder if an e-book would be better or worse for this issue. The backlight definitely seems handy but it's still a screen so I don't know...
I just read this online:
"Q. Is reading on an e-reader bad for my eyes?
Megan Hupp
Washington, D.C.
A. Not in moderation. So says Harvey Moscot, a New York City–based optometrist. That said, if you spend a long period (more than two hours) staring at a screen—on an e-book, a smart phone, or a laptop—you could suffer from what is sometimes called computer vision syndrome (CVS), a repetitive-stress condition characterized by some uncomfortable side effects, including headaches, blurred vision, and eyestrain.
To prevent CVS, some e-readers, like Amazon’s Kindle, use “electronic ink,” which has sharply defined type and is easy on the eyes. Reading on electronic-ink devices compares most closely to doing so on paper (which is what our eyes tolerate best). Other e-book models, like Apple’s iPad and Barnes & Noble’s Nook-Color, have a backlit LCD screen, similar to a computer monitor. Even though these devices generate their own light, you may want to keep a lamp on close by (no reading under the covers!). A stark contrast between the screen and your surroundings is hard on the eyes.
Also take brief breaks to avoid eye-strain, says Moscot, who recommends the 20-20-20 rule: After 20 minutes of reading, focus on an object 20 feet away for 20 seconds."
I wonder if Kindle Paperwhite is equipped with this 'electronical ink".
"Q. Is reading on an e-reader bad for my eyes?
Megan Hupp
Washington, D.C.
A. Not in moderation. So says Harvey Moscot, a New York City–based optometrist. That said, if you spend a long period (more than two hours) staring at a screen—on an e-book, a smart phone, or a laptop—you could suffer from what is sometimes called computer vision syndrome (CVS), a repetitive-stress condition characterized by some uncomfortable side effects, including headaches, blurred vision, and eyestrain.
To prevent CVS, some e-readers, like Amazon’s Kindle, use “electronic ink,” which has sharply defined type and is easy on the eyes. Reading on electronic-ink devices compares most closely to doing so on paper (which is what our eyes tolerate best). Other e-book models, like Apple’s iPad and Barnes & Noble’s Nook-Color, have a backlit LCD screen, similar to a computer monitor. Even though these devices generate their own light, you may want to keep a lamp on close by (no reading under the covers!). A stark contrast between the screen and your surroundings is hard on the eyes.
Also take brief breaks to avoid eye-strain, says Moscot, who recommends the 20-20-20 rule: After 20 minutes of reading, focus on an object 20 feet away for 20 seconds."
I wonder if Kindle Paperwhite is equipped with this 'electronical ink".

That's exactly why I have a Nook tablet AND a Glowlight. You can't get magazine, watch videos, etc on the GL, but for just reading it simply cannot be beat.

I have been reading more paperbacks lately and I have to admit I missed the feeling of holding a real book in my hands. Not as practical as my Kindle, though. Must use my hands at all times :/

1/ I got back into bookcrossing lately, which means a lot of exchange of physical books.
2/ I'm desperately trying to decrease my piles of unread books. I've been reading more of the physical ones since the advance is much more visible (they change place on my shelves when I've read them).
But it is clearly not as convenient when I am travelling, which has been often the case lately (I currently have three books in my suitcase, something that haven't happened in ages because I can have so much more of them in my e-reader).
I completely understand, especially the part about decreasing the pile of 'real books'.
Besides, I actually bought these while all my e-books are free so it kinda feels like a waste not to read them :P
At the same time, I keep putting it off. I guess I want the feeling to last. Especially with the Stephen King books I haven't read. I have Joyland, Cujo, Thinner, Revival and Mr Mercedes just waiting to be devoured and I think I am terrified I won't like them as much as his other stuff...
Also, I really miss buddy reads, the entire experience makes me look at books in an entirely different way.
Besides, I actually bought these while all my e-books are free so it kinda feels like a waste not to read them :P
At the same time, I keep putting it off. I guess I want the feeling to last. Especially with the Stephen King books I haven't read. I have Joyland, Cujo, Thinner, Revival and Mr Mercedes just waiting to be devoured and I think I am terrified I won't like them as much as his other stuff...
Also, I really miss buddy reads, the entire experience makes me look at books in an entirely different way.

