r/books discussion
Open Discussion
>
Neal Stephenson
date
newest »


The writing was interesting at the beginning of the book. But I was quickly bogged down (as you put it) with unlikely plot lines and too many cases of deus ex machina. I wouldn't classify Stephenson as someone who isn't accessible to the average reader. It seems more likely that his intricate stories are not strongly held together by plausible circumstances and realistic character development.
Simply put: great ideas, poor execution.


I refused to force myself to wade through more of the baroque cycle, (stopped mid way book2) even though I'm a scientist by trade. Reamde is borderline boring at this stage (30% in), even though things are blowing up. In my opinion he may have gone the way of Tom Clancy after editors decided his work was holy. Baroque cycle in a single book? Might be worth reading. Cryptonomicon with half the pages? More enjoyable most likely. We'll see... I think Reamde is the last one I'll try for him depending on how I feel when it's done. And hence why I suggest that editors are unwilling to piss him off. I think forcing him into a novella or short-story for a while might make him rethink his writing strategy.
[This comes from someone who loves some of Umberto Eco's older works and also forces himself to wade through some of his new "holy" works.] So, maybe I should call it a love-hate relationship? Sad to say, because I've re-read Snow Crash and Diamond Age a number of times now. They're books I suggest to anyone I meet.
I tried really hard to get through one of his books but I got bogged down in all of the technology. Are they all scientifically based? or am I just not smart enough?