2-3-4 Challenge Book Discussions #2 discussion

Did you at first question whether Brian Hall was truly innocent?

There was so much evidence against him that it was hard to think he was innocent. I thought maybe he was involved somehow.

At the very beginning, I thought maybe someone had manipulated the evidence. I liked how the author decided to create a double threat in this story.

I really didn't think he was innocent at the beginning. I think part of it was hoping that an innocent man hadn't been in prison that long.

I had the same hope, too, for Olivia's sake.

I thought he must have been guilty. I really wanted him to be guilty. After all, he didn't put up any defense and I can't believe it took 40 years for him to "remember" his buddy with the same unusual tattoo.

Anita wrote: "I thought he must have been guilty. I really wanted him to be guilty. After all, he didn't put up any defense and I can't believe it took 40 years for him to "remember" his buddy with the same unus..."

I agree, Anita.

Anita wrote: "I thought he must have been guilty. I really wanted him to be guilty. After all, he didn't put up any defense and I can't believe it took 40 years for him to "remember" his buddy with the same unus..."

And even when he remembered, it took a lot of prompting. He didn’t have a lot going on upstairs.

LOL!! My feelings exactly!

When DNA evidence was produced, I had to admit he must have been innocent; imagine how many men have been wrongly prosecuted in the past.

I shudder thinking about that, Charlene.

Charlene wrote: "When DNA evidence was produced, I had to admit he must have been innocent; imagine how many men have been wrongly prosecuted in the past."

I remember thinking about that too, Charlene, when I was reading. And not only been in prison but possibly executed when they were innocent.