History in Vogue discussion

Emma
This topic is about Emma
13 views
Book to Film > Emma. (2020)

Comments Showing 1-8 of 8 (8 new)    post a comment »
dateUp arrow    newest »

QNPoohBear | 478 comments I had low expectations coming into this so I was pleasantly surprised. I enjoyed it very much but it's not my favorite adaptation. Anya Taylor-Joy was a delight as Emma. Emma is not a likable character and I felt she portrayed that. Mia Goth is acceptable as naive Harriet but not up to the level of the incredible Toni Colette. Miranda Hart as Miss Bates is decent. She runs on and on well but the script didn't do justice to the real tragedy that is Miss Bates's life. There's no mention of how she was once the vicar's daughter which gave her a high status in the community. She's now an impoverished country spinster dependent upon the generosity of others. She can't go where she wants, when she wants and must wait to be invited. This is only briefly conveyed by her excitement over being invited to tea at Hartfield. Tanya Reynolds as Mrs. Elton was appropriately awful but again she was downplayed in the script. Her personality was more conveyed through her clothes and hairstyle. The women were mostly pretty good.

The men, however, were lacking. Josh O'Connor (Larry Durrell) as Mr. Elton is perfect! He was funny, smarmy and an foppish. Mr. Knightley and Frank Churchill were terribly miscast. Since when is Mr. Knightley an emotional dandy? Those shirt points were way too high for a country gentleman who actually oversees management of his estate, walks across fields, etc. The actor was wooden and didn't have any chemistry with his leading lady. Frank Churchill cut got down in size to a minor character. I was disappointed they cut out the parts where Jane Fairfax is upset by Frank and Emma's flirting and how she was going to sell herself in the governess trade. Cutting that out ruined Frank Churchill's plot and Emma's growth.

Mr. Knightley was awful. He's some weird, emo dude falling on the floor in angst filled fits and running around like a maniac. His chemistry with Emma is next to none and he has lost his playful sense of humor. I didn't find him very attractive. Johnny Lee Miller is my Mr. Knightley of choice!

Mr. Woodhouse, hypochondriac, is very spritely for an invalid! Standing straight, jumping down stairs, going to weddings-that's not Jane Austen's Mr. Woodhouse. I love Bill Nighy but he's not Mr. Woodhouse. The real Mr. Woodhouse is a semi-invalid who fears everything. He doesn't even attend "poor Miss Taylor's" wedding.





A post shared by Autumn de Wilde (@autumndewilde) on Mar 11, 2020 at 8:45am PDT



I also felt they cut too much about Miss Bates, her garrulousness and her poverty. She's very fashionably dressed for an impoverished spinster!

The twist at the end with Harriet was stupid and unrealistic.

The little gestures are needed like Mr. Knightley bringing Emma's hand to his heart.

The scenery, the houses, the women's clothes were all EXQUISITE! Emma's pink spencer and some of her other gowns were copies of actual period pieces. The men's costumes were not so great.

What was especially nice about the costumes is that the underpinnings are correct as well and shown on screen. The same with nightwear. It's nice to see the characters are real flesh and blood people who wear underwear and nightgowns and put their hair in curl rags. Emma's perfection is not that of a carved statue. It takes work.

The music was an odd, eclectic mix of period classical music and noisy folk tunes that may be appropriate for a film set in the country but jar with the perfect drawing room setting of the story.

(view spoiler)

I think this one is in the middle of the pack for me. I have to see the Kate Beckinsale version again.


message 2: by Linda (new)

Linda  | 492 comments Pooh, I was excited to see this in theatres but obviously...
Where are you streaming it from?


QNPoohBear | 478 comments Linda Abhors the New GR Design wrote: "Pooh, I was excited to see this in theatres but obviously...
Where are you streaming it from?"


We streamed it from Fios On Demand. Amazon Prime also has it.


message 4: by Linda (new)

Linda  | 492 comments Cool! Thanks! I've not used video from Amazon yet


QNPoohBear | 478 comments We love our Amazon Prime video. I also added a trial of Acorn Media. I've seen MOST of the British shows I want to watch but I found a few new ones I haven't seen yet. Then I'll add a trial of BritBox to watch some Mary Berry.


message 6: by Linda (new)

Linda  | 492 comments Yeah, if I have Prime, anyway, this would be a good time. As soon as this lifts, I'm gonna get a smart (and yes, Marie, bigger!) TV.


QNPoohBear | 478 comments Our TV from 2012 had Amazon and Netflix when we bought it but now it doesn't support those good apps anymore and neither does the GoogleTV at the other house so my dad got a ChromeCast device for that house. He brought it home and we love it. I just watched Pride and Prejudice: the musical, a livestream premiere. I want to keep the ChromeCast here so I can keep watching stuff but I think they'll bring it back to the beach house over the summer or the kids will fuss when they can't watch their Netflix and YouTube.


message 8: by Linda (new)

Linda  | 492 comments Lol, My niece always says her children aren't spoiled and she doesn't let them watch a lot of TV. When they came here and I had cable and could not dial up paw patrol when the four-year-old wanted me to dial up paw patrol it wasn't A happy moment. I think she like many young people today does not believe that Netflix's TV (even though she's in her 40s).
Thanks for the tips. As you know, I'm still rocking the same TV I brought with me when I moved here 20 years ago. And the remote was lost long ago in Madison, so if I don't have the cable Box, then I have to get up and manually change the channel and lower the volume every time those freaking loud commercials come on. Time to just get a larger one. so that I
can actually read
subtitles on the
screen from across
the room, lol


back to top