The Mookse and the Gripes discussion

This topic is about
A Ghost in the Throat
Queen Mary Prize (RofC UK)
>
2021 RofC longlist - A Ghost in the Throat
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Hugh, Active moderator
(last edited Feb 04, 2021 08:06AM)
(new)
-
rated it 5 stars
Feb 04, 2021 04:31AM


reply
|
flag


Have heard a lot of good things about this one on Twitter so I am looking forward to reading it.

Oddly I think I am correct in saying that this book won a non-fiction prize?


Oddly I think I am correct in saying that this book won a non-fiction prize?"
I heard about it through Rick O'Shea - generally when he exudes lavish praise on a book, I pay attention (I'm not too keen on his book club picks though) He chose Ghost as his fave non-fiction book of 2020.
I think it won the An Post Irish Novel Award.


I'm going to have to go back and review the concept of rooms in the book - they get a lot of mentions. Or at least they do in my memory of the book.


And agreed with Neil's comments - this definitely ticks the 'gorgeous prose' box for the prize. And it does lose it's way a bit - though that only seemed a few chapters - went it gets into a more checking-parish-registers form of family tracing.
And rooms is definitely a linking device that she uses effectively.
And it seems a very worthy winner of the overall Irish Book of the Year Overall* and Novel Prize and yet also Foyles Non-Fiction Book of the Year. It rather neatly straddles the divide between essay, autofiction/autobiography and historical fiction.
* rather impressively Tramp Press have now won the overall Irish Book of the Year 3 times in 5 years - this, Solar Bones and Notes to Self: Essays

Did those who enjoyed it take it in in one big reading, or was it split over a few sessions?
Because five days on I barely remember a bit of what I read.




The Horse Under The Hearth
Quiet now, his stables. No clatter-hoof on the cobbles.
That morning: her saddle bloody, askew, and she
all stumble-legged, froth-flecked, nostril-blaze, trailing reins.
When her eyes found mine, I knew.
I took three leaps: the first over the threshold, the second
to the gate, the third to her back, then fast gallop
over boreen and trampled brambles to his spilled blood.
Everyone knows what happened then, I versed it strong
and spoke it often. But what of her?
Her neck, like mine, knew the rough stubble of his cheek.
I couldn’t leave her with them. I sent them out, his men.
And so, her head came back, in a wet sack that leaked in my lap
and reddened my skirts. I pulled the burlap back, looked
Into her eyes - sunken, unseeing –
Her ear torn, a delicate nostril crushed.
sighed when the hearthstone was pried away.
The fire and I watched as they dug. No one spoke.
I rolled her head into the hole, watched them
shelter her in dirt and stone.
Now, when I watch flames consume wood, I think of her
slow change from muscle and mane to bone and dirt.
When the house grows too quiet, I stand on that hearthstone
and dance. Each ankle tap, each heel rap brings me back
to those fast moments before
we found him, and again, it is only
us two, and we are galloping
and galloping and never reaching him.

I really was struck by the drinking blood links from the narrator's life to the poem
https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...

What I liked was the impression at the beginning that it'd be some kind of poststructuralist écriture féminine (milk-ink, body-text), but the more I read the more I found it horrific in its depiction of cis-heteronormative femininity without any distance whatsoever. I had to drop it, that's how unbearable it became for me.
I can't see the rest of Men and Apparitions changing my mind, so this is my favourite book on the list - I didn't even get bored with the family history research parts, but having done a bit of that myself I may be a little biased towards that.

Does anybody know how to pronounce the authors name?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XtCj2...

I really was..."
Drinking blood seems to be a minor "thing" in this year's longlisted books, as the narrator in Unknown Language drank a bit of the blood of her companion when she was cleansing the companion's wound. I've four books left and wondering if there will be more blood drinking.


What struck me was the juxtaposition of woman as creator of life and of great art with the erasure/invisibility of women. Ní Ghríofa revels in, wallows in, motherhood, her body literally creates several lives and sustains even more lives, she exhausts herself in daily, nightly, selfless acts while at the same time researching the life of Eibhlin Dubh Ní Chonaill, author of arguably Ireland’s greatest poem. Ní Ghríofa finds that Eibhlin is remembered for her one great poem, a keen for her murdered husband, but then only in relationship to the men in her life.
There was much about motherhood in this book, but I saw it as being more about how easily women’s contributions are forgotten or overlooked, then about motherhood. Why is there a poem, a grave, a marker for the murdered man, but nothing for the creator of that great poem?
This is my initial reaction to the book (before my busy weekend starts) another many layered book and I will be thinking about it for a long time.
I also loved hearing the Caoineadh Airt uí Laoghaire read on YouTube. It is very moving. It’s not Ní Ghríofa’s translation, but it was good to hear it spoken.
https://youtu.be/5Ih86JSmZWs

What I liked was the impression at the beginning that it'd be some kind of poststructuralist..."
I think it was written the way it was because this is the author’s experience, she wrote about her life, without suggesting that her choices were the only legitimate choices. She is a cis female in a hetero relationship who clearly loves motherhood and all that goes with it. Not every woman chooses a life with a man, not every woman chooses motherhood, not every mother chooses to breastfeed that long, if at all, but the women that do make those choices don’t need to pretend that they are doing something wrong or horrific. It was simply her life. If she was non-binary, pansexual with no children she would have written a different book because her experience would be that.

What I liked was the impression at the beginning that it'd be some kind of po..."
I agree, Wendy, and suspect that had the author written from any other POV (nonbinary, POC, etc) she would be castigated for cultural appropriation.


Books mentioned in this topic
Solar Bones (other topics)Notes To Self (other topics)
A Ghost in the Throat (other topics)