Trail-Mix Readers discussion
Reviews
>
Imogene's Message
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Jessica
(new)
Feb 05, 2015 02:27PM

reply
|
flag

It will not appeal to readers who want a character driven narrative whose characters overcome adversity by finding inner strength and gathering resources and allies. Which is sad, because I’m one of those readers. I really wanted to like this book and, except for the religious polemics, found myself enjoying the plot and pacing. At least I did until halfway in when it went totally sideways, backwards and inside out.
Think of this book as The Day the Earth Stood Still with the child Imogene as Klaatu, the Archangel Rahmiel as Gort and featuring battles between American commandos and Soviet fifth columnists, not to mention firefights between good and bad Aliens (maybe the Greens and Grays). The only thing missing was the lightsabers.
Nor will Imogene’s Message appeal to feminist readers who believe women don’t need men to fight their battles. The female characters, particularly the heroine (or rather the victim) Xantara, basically sit back and let the men do the saving. At almost every turn, when Xantara or Imogene are endangered, her husband or son, a reporter, or the angel Rahmiel step in to save them.
Xantara tells her family, "I ask myself, do we have any control over our lives? I think not." My former publisher, the late Susan Bright of the Plain View Press, a feminist and a worshipper of the Goddess would have shuddered to hear these words.
I'm trying to be fair, and I know the book is intended to be an appeal to religious tolerance, but, I haven’t had an experience like this since my friends and I went to see the premiere of the original Red Dawn in Dallas. (We were organizing the Tent Cities to protest the Republican National Convention.) During the scenes when Harry Dean Stanton slapped his sons through the barbed wire for crying at the prison camp because real men don’t cry, and Leah Thompson held onto a live grenade when she died so the Russians wouldn't rape her corpse (and then we heard the explosion in the background), we found ourselves laughing out loud.
We didn't mean too. We didn't particularly want too. We just couldn't help ourselves. And in Dallas, in 1984, during the Republican National Convention, that was a dangerous thing to do. (The other patrons, still wearing their cowboy hats, even many of the women, would turn around to stare at us with eyes like like the barrels of sawed-off shotguns.)
(view spoiler)
Sherborne calls Imogene's Message a thriller of extreme prejudice. The extreme prejudice seems to transfer over to her feelings as well.
If the readers who love the book get their wish Sherborne will already have a sequel in the works. If the rest of us get our wish, the story ends here.
The Guardians have spoken....It’s a series.
Phillip T. Stephens is the author of Cigerets, Guns & Beer and Raising Hell. He is also the author of Poems, Parables and Prayers for the Third Millennium (Plain View Press, 2001), promoting religious tolerance and acceptance. You can follow him @stephens_pt.


starting with Re: Colonized Planet 5
http://bit.ly/1zRsE7Y

I think that it is a personal setting for each profile. I vaguely remember having to decide if I wanted to view spoilers or now...maybe...vague memories are all I have of setting up profiles.

I was particularly confused near the end of the book, in the 'showdown' at the church. In a very brief scene, Alistair and Sean fight and the candlestick "pierced the young man's forehead and he dropped". Since Alistair was not mentioned a single time after that, not even when each escapee was named, I decided he was the one to die. The entire escape lost its effectiveness, because I was thinking how uncaring his parents were at his death. (A later passage mentions that Riordan's brother died, meaning Sean.) Poor Alistair is totally forgotten, but by the author.
I have no particular comment about the whole good vs. evil, light vs. dark plot of the book, except that I won't be reading the sequel. Too fanatical for my tastes. For the most part, the book was well written, I just didn't care for the story.
Sorry to say, only 2 stars from me.


This story had such a powerful start, I loved the first chapter and even got a ways into the story but then it kind of went sideways for me. The writing is good, there were some graphic, gruesome scenes but they held my attention and kept me wondering where the story was going - I'm always rooting for good to win over evil, and there was definitely some evil in this story. This story clearly outlined and gave a really good sense of the fanaticism and small mindedness of some. The characters were well crafted. Unfortunately I found myself about halfway through and felt disconnected from the story and from Xantara, well any of them really. I think the story idea is great but too many characters were constantly being introduced, almost right to the end. I'm a fan of thrillers and meeting lots of characters but not introduced so late. Also I lost touch with Xanatra who's story I thought this would be about as she was who it started with. There wasn't anyone who was present enough throughout to connect with. In some cases I also felt that resolving the issue was too rushed. The story which started out great seemed to become more about sharing a message then about the story. With some changes this would be a great read.
Thank you, Maggie! I certainly appreciate your review and participation in our previous BOTMs! How many stars did you give it?