Fast Moving Killas discussion

This is the second discussion post for Faithful Executioner. As usual, post one question and one response. Get creative!

Here is my question:

To help build his reputation, what was one thing that Frantz vowed to do? During his lifetime, why do you think it was important to avoid being placed in a common stereotype?

Here is another question if you can't answer the first:

Why do you think Frantz walked on foot? Does the author give any clues for this method of travel?

The transformation of Frantz Schmidt from aspiring journeyman to salaried master of Nuremburg is truly an inspiring tale of upwards mobility that one can only imagine was rare in those heavily caste-segregated times. Something that really stuck out to me during this chapter of the book was the dichotomy between Frantz's rigid moral values (abstaining from drinking, womanizing, etc.) and the violent inhumane profession that he excelled in and was able to rationalize to himself as a necessary evil.

My question for you all: What reasons does the book give as an explanation for the exponential increase in state-enforced violence that started during Frantz's adolescence? Do you think a more modern approach (rehabilitation, longer prison sentences) would've worked during the 16th-17th centuries, or do you think that frequent public displays of primitive violence were more effective at dissuading those with criminal inclinations?

In response to Ryan's question:

I do not believe that a more modern approach would've decreased crime rates. According to this chapter (The Journeyman), we see that crowds are pleased with a good execution, showing that violence has been a part of German culture for generations and that this is how common people expected criminals to be dealt with. Integrating more modern ideas suddenly could possibly cause protests and mass disproval throughout the empire.