You'll love this one...!! A book club & more discussion

This topic is about
Run for the Hills
Group Themed Reads: Discussions
>
June 2025 - Run for the Hills
date
newest »


For those who participate in Netgalley, they still have this book available for request.

Rube (view spoiler)
Mad (view spoiler)
When we are driving we typically do an over/under bet on how many police speed traps we will encounter, we changed it to how many times the author will say “PT Cruiser”- play along it’s fun.
I’m having a hard time rating this book between 4-5 stars. I think I will wait until after we talk about it a bit.

We used to play "Horse Horse" when we were kids. If you saw a horse, we'd holler out "Horse". We'd also scan for graveyards because you could bury everyone's horses in the graveyard.

(view spoiler)

[spoilers removed]"
I agree with you completely on that.

I liked the sibling bond too. It rang true to me.
Rube (view spoiler)

That was (view spoiler)

(view spoiler)

[spoilers removed]"
(view spoiler)

(view spoiler)
And I'm with you Marnie - I can't decide between 4-5 stars. I think I will round up my 4.5 to 5 stars

RIGHT?!?

[spoilers removed]
And I'm with you Marnie - I can't decide between 4-5 stars. I think I will round up my 4.5 to 5 stars"
You have a great insight to the book then. (view spoiler)


I read all of this and loathed it--the writing and humour didn't work for me. I kept reading, hoping it would get better because I have a couple of GR friends who rated this highly.
Most of my thoughts are in my review, but suffice it to say that comedy is subjective and this humour didn't work at all for me. I liked the idea of this book, but not the execution. One laugh at ONE little line. Overall I didn't like the characters and found the book depressing for the most part. Mad reminded me of Margaret Atwood type characters who are detached; I am not a fan of most of Atwood's writing, but as a Canadian had to read books by her in various classes in university, only one of which was an English class.
Some of the other low ratings were from people who've liked other books by this author, but I have no desire to read anything else by him.
I have ONE spoiler not in spoiler brackets in my review, but it's right at the very end.
my review


Right, I forgot to do that!

I wasn't thrilled with Pep (view spoiler)

Not much humour for me either so far. But, I think humour is hard to do in book form. I’ve read some samples of books written by comedians I like but they just fall flat. Very few writers make me laugh and even then it’s usually more of a chuckle. Maybe it’s the lack of timing, facial expressions and body language that makes the comedy less impactful.
Also, the subject matter is not one many people would choose for comedy. I might be biased because I am British but dark humour is not something that many Americans can seem to do or at least do well. Maybe it would be funnier if it was written by a Brit.

I’m interested to know what excuse or explanation the Charles/Chuck will have.



Yeah, that was a bit unbelievable.

Being funny in print is a different skill than being funny visually, but either way humour is subjective; nothing tickles everyone's funny bones.
What many people don't realize is that in addition to hard work and skill, being really funny is also a gift, just like being mathy, musical, being able to act, being amazing with people, etc.

I was wondering if there are parts that maybe came through as funny with the audio version. Sometimes a good narrator can add to the effect. Did anyone have the audio?

So, the audio didn't affect it then. I think I'd just call this contemporary fiction. It doesn't need the humor tag. That really just sets people up with the wrong expectations.

(view spoiler)

[spoilers removed]"
I agree, but it's also in the last paragraph of the book description :)
Infused with deadpan wit, zany hijinks, and enormous heart, Run for the Hills is a sibling story like no other—a novel about a family forged under the most unlikely circumstances and united by hope in an unknown future.
Janice will be leading the discussion.
In order to receive a badge you must:
1. have read the book before or during June 2025.
2. discussed it in this thread. Discussion must be more than "I read the book and I liked it". Discussion requires something more substantial and analytical of what you read, for example, thoughts, opinions, impact it had on you, what was your favorite part, was it what you expected it to be like etc. You may also like to review the book and post a link to the review in this thread. Please refer to our group spoiler policy for further information.
3. Report that you have read AND discussed the book in the reporting thread (include a brief summary of what you thought of the book).
A note on discussion: Discussion must be more than "I read the book and I liked it". Discussion requires something more substantial and analytical of what you read, for example, thoughts, opinions, impact it had on you, what was your favorite part, was it what you expected it to be like etc.
In addition to this, the group reads are meant to be a "read along" so it is preferable that you discuss the book as you read rather than wait until you've finished the book.
And finally, discussion is not about just listing your thoughts. Please interact with the other group members, comment on their thoughts, and if they comment on yours, respond to them. This is what makes a good book discussion!
You may also like to review the book and post a link to the review in this thread.
Please refer to our group spoiler policy for further information.
General Rules:
1. Please mark your spoilers with the spoiler tags along with mentioning what stage of the book you are at so other's don't get a nasty shock. Chapter numbers/titles are generally best as they are the same across all formats and editions. See our spoiler policy
2. The book may be combined with the Year Long Challenge, Topplers, and Monthly Challenges.
Happy reading!