Newbery Books discussion
2008 Book of the Month
>
Book of the Month?
date
newest »

It sounds interesting to me. I can't promise I'll always participate, but if we can get a group of 'most of the times' who stick to that, there should be a decent quorum most months.
Do you want to read them in reverse order? Draw out of a hat? Have a member suggest a favorite each month? Your idea, so I'll leave the selection process up to you.
Do you want to read them in reverse order? Draw out of a hat? Have a member suggest a favorite each month? Your idea, so I'll leave the selection process up to you.
I was thinking to mix it up we can start with most recent one, and then go with the oldest the next (2008, 1922, 2007, 1923, etc.) I think it might be interesting to compare the modern children's literature from the old school. Although I'm up for any method if anyone feels strongly either way.

Alright, let's start with "Good Masters! Sweet Ladies!"
Let's all start reading right now if we can and start the discussion May 1. Or do we need more time to get a copy of the book? Unless I hear back let's plan on it.
Also let's do a month or two doing one at a time. If it seems like we have time for more we'll up it to two per month.
Let's all start reading right now if we can and start the discussion May 1. Or do we need more time to get a copy of the book? Unless I hear back let's plan on it.
Also let's do a month or two doing one at a time. If it seems like we have time for more we'll up it to two per month.


I'm going to recommend that each book get its own thread, so discussions about various books don't pile up on each other and get confused.
I've got this book on hold at the library, so if Multnomah County comes through for me, I'm in.
I've got this book on hold at the library, so if Multnomah County comes through for me, I'm in.





Luckily, this one doesn't involve driving anywhere, or bringing potluck.
Okay, I'll miss the potluck.
:muffins:
:pasta salad:
:cheese dip:
Okay, I'll miss the potluck.
:muffins:
:pasta salad:
:cheese dip:

Kristine, welcome to the club! We are reading Good Masters! Sweet Ladies! the newest Newberry winner and we will be discussing it May 1st. I have the only copy that the Little Chute library has, but the Appleton library has several copies so you shouldn't have any trouble getting one there.



To Kathy:
I wouldn't mind doing this at all -- that way we're always jumping 40 years apart instead of working back together to the middle. Since a lot of people already have Good Masters checked out I think we should go ahead with it for May.
But I'm up with then going to 1922 for June and then to the middle year, which is 1965 for July .....
I wouldn't mind doing this at all -- that way we're always jumping 40 years apart instead of working back together to the middle. Since a lot of people already have Good Masters checked out I think we should go ahead with it for May.
But I'm up with then going to 1922 for June and then to the middle year, which is 1965 for July .....


I only had to wait a week and a half or something at my local library, but Powells Books is out of it.


are there any disagreements with the following schedule?
June = 1922 The Story of Mankind
July = 1965 Shadow of a Bull
Aug = 1923 The Voyages of Doctor Dolittle
Sep = 1966 I, Juan de Pareja
Oct = 1924 The Dark Frigate
Nov = 1967 Up A Road Slowly
Dec = 1925 Tales from Silver Lands
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I am actually excited to read the older books (of which I know nothing about). The books in the last 30 years have been my favorites because I've grown up reading them. But when I have read an older one I'm surprised how much I enjoy it. So I'm hoping for many pleasant surprises by forcing myself to read the old ones!
June = 1922 The Story of Mankind
July = 1965 Shadow of a Bull
Aug = 1923 The Voyages of Doctor Dolittle
Sep = 1966 I, Juan de Pareja
Oct = 1924 The Dark Frigate
Nov = 1967 Up A Road Slowly
Dec = 1925 Tales from Silver Lands
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I am actually excited to read the older books (of which I know nothing about). The books in the last 30 years have been my favorites because I've grown up reading them. But when I have read an older one I'm surprised how much I enjoy it. So I'm hoping for many pleasant surprises by forcing myself to read the old ones!
Totally looking forward to Dr. Dolittle! But some of the more obscure early ones may be out of print or hard to find.
I would like it if we got some of the newer ones into the mix, because as awesome as I think this idea is, I just don't think we'll keep it going long enough to get from the 1960s to the modern era on this schedule.
I would like it if we got some of the newer ones into the mix, because as awesome as I think this idea is, I just don't think we'll keep it going long enough to get from the 1960s to the modern era on this schedule.


The other option is to go the other way and work backwards instead of forwards:
June = 1964 - It's Like This Cat
July = 2007 - Higher Power of Lucky
Aug = 1963 - A Wrinkle in Time
Sep = 2006 - Criss Cross
Oct = 1962 - The Bronze Bow
Nov = 2005 - Kira-Kira
Dec = 1961 - Island of Blue Dolphins
I have never had a problem getting my hands on the newer Newbery books because libraries seem to have several copies of them. And it helps to have the list ahead of time. That way we go from a book we're familiar with to one we're not.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Other than that we'll just do it randomly by suggestion per month. Which is also fine, but not as organized as my OCD personality would like :-)
June = 1964 - It's Like This Cat
July = 2007 - Higher Power of Lucky
Aug = 1963 - A Wrinkle in Time
Sep = 2006 - Criss Cross
Oct = 1962 - The Bronze Bow
Nov = 2005 - Kira-Kira
Dec = 1961 - Island of Blue Dolphins
I have never had a problem getting my hands on the newer Newbery books because libraries seem to have several copies of them. And it helps to have the list ahead of time. That way we go from a book we're familiar with to one we're not.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Other than that we'll just do it randomly by suggestion per month. Which is also fine, but not as organized as my OCD personality would like :-)


What does everyone else think?

Actually, I really liked Good Masters and I'm looking forward to discussing it tomorrow. I think that this is the nature of being in any book club, some of the books you will like and some you won't. Just because the book won an award doesn't necessarily mean that you will automatically love it. Also, I think that it's good to have a variety of opinions it makes the discussions much more interesting. So, we will all be sure to "tune in" tomorrow so that we can hear Brandy tell us why she didn't like it.
By the way, Louise, if you're looking for someone to take a couple of your kids off your hands, I'll take them!!! We REALLY miss your family, and we'd be more than happy to take whoever you want to send our way.



ok, let's see if we can get this decision made so we can all get June's book on request at our libraries:
is this ok with everyone?
June = 1964 - It's Like This Cat
July = 2007 - Higher Power of Lucky
Aug = 1963 - A Wrinkle in Time
Sep = 2006 - Criss Cross
Oct = 1962 - The Bronze Bow
Nov = 2005 - Kira-Kira
Dec = 1961 - Island of Blue Dolphins
is this ok with everyone?
June = 1964 - It's Like This Cat
July = 2007 - Higher Power of Lucky
Aug = 1963 - A Wrinkle in Time
Sep = 2006 - Criss Cross
Oct = 1962 - The Bronze Bow
Nov = 2005 - Kira-Kira
Dec = 1961 - Island of Blue Dolphins

yeah, we'll read, "it's like this cat" in may and then discuss in June! sorry for the confusion!
We were wondering if we could use this forum to pick one or two books a month -- and discuss them here. Would anyone else like to join in?
I know we're probably all in a bunch of other book clubs/groups, but these are usually really short, fast reads. Anyway, let me know if that's ok. Maybe we can start with our first book in May?